13.07.2015 Views

The Role of the Courts in Securing Welfare Rights and ...

The Role of the Courts in Securing Welfare Rights and ...

The Role of the Courts in Securing Welfare Rights and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Welfare</strong> Law Centerraises claims under state law, <strong>the</strong> Americans With Disabilities Act, <strong>and</strong> Title VI <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Civil<strong>Rights</strong> Act. <strong>The</strong> court has granted prelim<strong>in</strong>ary relief f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that denial <strong>of</strong> a disability exemptionto those who did not respond to a letter from <strong>the</strong> private contractor responsible for mak<strong>in</strong>gdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations was arbitrary <strong>and</strong> unreasonable <strong>in</strong> violation <strong>of</strong> state law requir<strong>in</strong>g that welfareadm<strong>in</strong>istration be fair <strong>and</strong> equitable. <strong>The</strong> court found that <strong>the</strong> letter was technical, confus<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong>difficult to underst<strong>and</strong>, complete <strong>and</strong> return <strong>and</strong> that it required an educational level higher thanthat <strong>of</strong> most recipients.Smith v. McIntire (Massachusetts). 15 This case challenges <strong>the</strong> denial <strong>of</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gsdisregards <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g eligibility for <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> grant extensions for families that haveexhausted <strong>the</strong>ir state 24-month TANF time limit. <strong>The</strong> court ruled that <strong>the</strong> state regulations are <strong>in</strong>conflict with <strong>the</strong> state welfare statute which requires <strong>the</strong> disregards.AFDC Litigation:Massachusetts Coalition for <strong>the</strong> Homeless v. Secretary <strong>of</strong> Human Services(Massachusetts). 16 This litigation was part <strong>of</strong> an extensive campaign to <strong>in</strong>crease AFDC benefitlevels. In this 1987 decision <strong>the</strong> Massachusetts court ruled that a state statute required thatAFDC benefit levels be sufficient to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> families <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own homes <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore required<strong>the</strong> agency to 1) seek to prevent homelessness by provid<strong>in</strong>g sufficient bene fits or by o<strong>the</strong>rmeans; <strong>and</strong> 2) notify <strong>the</strong> legislature when appropriations were not sufficient to meet this duty.Although <strong>the</strong> court did not order <strong>the</strong> defendants to pay <strong>in</strong>creased benefits (a decision for <strong>the</strong>legislature), it did order <strong>the</strong>m to update <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong> adequacy annually <strong>and</strong> to ask <strong>the</strong>legislature to address <strong>the</strong> issues through appropriations or o<strong>the</strong>r means.2. State General Assistance StatutesGeneral Assistance (GA) programs are established under state, not federal law, <strong>and</strong>litigation has sought to enforce <strong>the</strong>se <strong>and</strong> related provisions <strong>in</strong> state law. 17 Some recent examples<strong>in</strong>clude:May 1999⋅ 8 ⋅

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!