13.07.2015 Views

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

Full text PDF - International Policy Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The World Health Organisation: a time for reconstitution 255fragile and unstable institutional arrangements: they are robustarrangements that promote creativity and progress. Fragility andinstability do appear in human societies, but when this happens theheavy hand of government is also close at hand.This is true at a macro and micro level. On a large scale, the GreatDepression is perhaps the prime instance of economic instability inthe 20th century. For a long time this catastrophe was presumed tobe the archetype of systemic market failure. Now, it is accepted thatit was an outstanding and prolonged example of systemic governmentfailure; the only remaining issues relate to the relative contributionsof the various paths that government took in promotingdepression. 3 Whatever the path, however, the Depression’s originlays with governments and not with free markets.On a small scale, claims of market failure are voluminous. Theargument is that externalities create market failures, which can onlybe corrected with some form of government regulation. Such claimsoften seem sensible on the surface, and equally often are shown tobe wrong upon careful examination.In a similar vein, it appeared reasonable for millennia to concludethat the sun rose in the west and set in the east. It wasn’t untilCopernicus examined the matter carefully that people came torealise that the surface impression was wrong. One of the archetypicalclaims of market failure – regarding bees and pollination (asituation that bears some resemblance to communicable disease) –was advanced by Nobel Laureate James Meade (Meade, 1952). Meadeillustrated his argument with beekeepers and apple farmers, andclaimed that markets would fail to secure efficient production. Onthe one hand, apple growers will plant too few trees because theydo not account for the value that their trees provide to beekeepers.On the other hand, beekeepers will supply an insufficient number ofhives because they do not consider the increased apple productionthat results from the pollination services the bees provide.At first glance, this story seems sensible. Yet a closer examinationof market relationships where honey and apples are producedshows this conclusion to be absolutely wrong: A wide variety of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!