13.07.2015 Views

ruoounu. nnSlunCIS&UINI-rOSIlnS - the Society for Reproductive ...

ruoounu. nnSlunCIS&UINI-rOSIlnS - the Society for Reproductive ...

ruoounu. nnSlunCIS&UINI-rOSIlnS - the Society for Reproductive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F~A FREE COMMUNICATIONS-COUNSELLING & PSYCHOSOCIALFSA FREE COMMUNICATIONS-COUNSELLING & PSYCHOSOCIALIntroduction - RationaleTHE EFFECT OF FIRST CYCLE FOLLOW UP BY COUNSELLORSLouise O'BymeMelbourne IVF 320 Victoria Parade East Melbourne 3002Over m~ny years our counselling unit has sought ways of improving access to counselling services <strong>for</strong> peopleundergomg IVF treatment. Although counselling is available free of charge, it is believed that <strong>the</strong> well documentedstr~sses oftreatment (depression, i~~lati~n, ~~f, s?ame etc) mean that. patients are less likely to seek <strong>the</strong> counsellingass1~tance <strong>the</strong>y may need. In add1tion, mfertIhty 1S often <strong>the</strong> first major life crisis faced by a couple and <strong>the</strong> act ofseekmg couns~lling assistance may be quite <strong>for</strong>eign. There<strong>for</strong>e improving <strong>the</strong> accessibility of<strong>the</strong> counselling servicedeserves attentlOn.MethodThe study te~ts <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that counsellor follow up after a patient's first cycle will increase subsequentco~sellor/pat1ent contaC!. Over a three month period, a total of 133 new patients were offered follow up contact by<strong>the</strong>1r counsellor after <strong>the</strong>Ir first treatment cycle. Subsequent contact with <strong>the</strong> counselling service was tracked over 8months and compared with that ofa ~ontrol group (~= 133). ~he data was also examined to measure <strong>the</strong> patient uptakeof <strong>the</strong> f~llow up offer; <strong>the</strong> capaCIty of <strong>the</strong> servIce to delIver follow up; gender differences; patterns of highcounsellmg need and <strong>the</strong> outcome ofdifferent types ofcounsellor contact.ResultsPatients in <strong>the</strong> follow up group were more t~an twi~e .as likely to have fur<strong>the</strong>r counselling contact (34% v 14%), in <strong>the</strong>first 8 ~onths oftreatment. An overwhelmmg maJonty (96%) of patients wanted follow-up after <strong>the</strong>ir first cycle and<strong>the</strong>:efVIce was abl~ t.o. meet 86% of<strong>the</strong>se requests. The vast majority ofcounsellor contact was with women or couples(93 %) and no men InItIated contact on <strong>the</strong>ir own.Most contact (7()oJO) ~th counsellors occurred within <strong>the</strong> first 8 months of treatment. Counsellor initiated telephonecalls or.messages ~oth mcreased subsequent contact with counsellors (31% and 47% patients made fur<strong>the</strong>r contact), butcareful mterpretatlOn of<strong>the</strong>se results is necessary.. ConclusionTh~ study supports !he hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that offering 1st cycle follow up will increase subsequent counsellor / patient contact.PatIents are. clearly m favour offollow up and <strong>the</strong> counselling service was generally able to deliver it. While 1st cyclefollow up I~ not a total ~olution in itself it ~ould be on of a number of measures used to improve counsellor access.The paper wIll also examme o<strong>the</strong>r study findmgs relevant to counselling service provision.SELF-CONCEPT DISCREPANCY THEORY: A MODEL FOR UNDERSTANDINGINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY IN REACTIONS TO INFERTILITY.Meredith 1. Krust-McKay<strong>Reproductive</strong> Medicine Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Wakefield Clinic, University ofAdelaide,Adelaide, SA, 5000.Purpose: Empirical investigation of <strong>the</strong> psychological sequelae of infertility has so far produced an inconsi,stentcharacterisation of <strong>the</strong> emotional demands of this experience. It has been suggested that such inconsistencies mayreflect individual variability in <strong>the</strong> response to infertility, which few studies have considered to date. This resea.iChinvestigated Higgins' (1987) Self-Discrepancy Theory (SDT) as a conceptual alternative <strong>for</strong> understanding individ~variability in psychological reactions to infertility. Higgins' <strong>the</strong>ory proposes that people possess more thanone~nPe,~tof <strong>the</strong>mselves and that discrepancies between <strong>the</strong>se self-concepts results in ei<strong>the</strong>r dejection or agitation relatedemotional discom<strong>for</strong>t. SDT is <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e proposed as a model <strong>for</strong> understanding <strong>the</strong> type and magnitude of emotionalreactions a person may experience, based upon <strong>the</strong> type and magnitude ofself-concept discrepancies.Aims: The research aimed to (a) validate <strong>the</strong> application ofSDT to <strong>the</strong> problem ofinfertility and (b) draw conclusionsabout <strong>the</strong> clinical utility ofSDT as a model <strong>for</strong> predicting <strong>the</strong> type and magnitude ofindividual emotional responses toinfertility.Method: Participants were 20 male and 26 female fertility patients, diagnosed with primary and secondary infertility.Participants completed a postal questionnaire containing self-report measures ofdepression, anxiety, psychologicalsymptomatology, and self-concept discrepancy.Results: The results ofthis research indicate that people with fertility problems do experience discrepancies between<strong>the</strong> different self-concepts proposed by SDT. Correlational analyses revealed that as <strong>the</strong> magnitude ofself-conceptdiscrepancies increased levels ofemotional discom<strong>for</strong>t also increased (r's ranged from.32 to .41, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!