APPLICATIONS to GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN - Marchetti DMT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CORRELATION OCR vs KdKamei T. and Iwasaki K.(1995). "Evaluation ofUndrained shear strenght of cohesive soils using a flatdila<strong>to</strong>meter"COMMENTPractically no appreciable difference vs 1980 correlationTorino 20 Nov 2001 10
Torino 20 Nov 2001 11
Page 1 and 2: THE FLAT DILATOMETER (DMT).APPLICAT
Page 3 and 4: GENERAL LAYOUT of DMTTorino 20 Nov
Page 5 and 6: SOILS that can be TESTED by DMT•
Page 7 and 8: REPRODUCIBILITY of DMTCestari (SGI)
Page 9: PRESENTATION of DMT RESULTSHOW TO U
Page 13 and 14: Cu at Skeena Ontario CanadaVs Field
Page 15 and 16: Cu at NATIONAL SITE FUCINOKPaZ (m)N
Page 17 and 18: Cu in Recife Clay - BrazilUniv. of
Page 19 and 20: M in ONSOY Clay (NORWAY)Norwegian G
Page 21 and 22: M in Sites in Virginia, U.S.A.Failm
Page 23 and 24: APPLICATION N° 1 SETTLEMENTSby Bou
Page 25 and 26: DMT-calculated vs observedSETTLEMEN
Page 27 and 28: Sawada S. and Sugawara N. (1995) "E
Page 29 and 30: CLAYc u = undrained strengthg T = u
Page 31 and 32: DISTORTIONS due to INSERTIONCONEOK
Page 33 and 34: DMTbefore-after for Compaction Cont
Page 35 and 36: FLAT SHAPE MORE REACTIVE TOSTRESS H
Page 37 and 38: a= Mdmt/Qc increases with OCR.Hence
Page 39 and 40: INFLUENCE OF PRESTRAININGON DMT RES
Page 41 and 42: DMT FOR LIQUEFACTION• Factors (SH
Page 43 and 44: Examples of Kd » 2 in SLIP SURFACE
Page 45 and 46: DMT for FEM Input PARAMETERSŒSimpl
Page 47 and 48: g - RANGE of MODULUS by DMTMayne -
Page 49 and 50: Often most of settlement in g >0.05
Page 51 and 52: Is MDMT an "operative modulus"?MDMT
Page 53 and 54: Why Difficult to get Operative Modu
Page 55 and 56: When use S-DMT : 2 points in G-g?Fr
Page 57: FINAL REMARKSIf purpose is to profi

APPLICATIONS to GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN - Marchetti DMT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?