13.07.2015 Views

Hubbard Model for Asymmetric Ultracold Fermionic ... - KOMET 337

Hubbard Model for Asymmetric Ultracold Fermionic ... - KOMET 337

Hubbard Model for Asymmetric Ultracold Fermionic ... - KOMET 337

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3. SELF-CONSISTENCY EQUATIONS 11withE kσ= −Unmσ√+ Bσ − (t2σ− t −σ)ε(k) + sign(E k) Ek 2 + U2 |∆| 2 . (2.31)Of course the new number operator is given by the product of the Bogoliubov quasiparticlecreation and annihilation operators as ¯n kσ= b † kσ b kσ .Obviously, in the new quasiparticle language the Hamiltonian is completely independent ofthe superfluid phase-factor δ, so that from now on we may treat ∆ as a real non-negativenumber (∆ ∈ R + 0 ).2.3 Self-consistency equationsIn this section we will restrict consideration to the thermodynamic limit (N → ∞) and derivethe self-consistency equations which determine (n,m,∆) <strong>for</strong> given parameters (U,t σ ,B,µ) intranslationally invariant systems. We will first introduce the <strong>Hubbard</strong> model’s interactionfreedensity of states in order to obtain the equations in the <strong>for</strong>m of one-dimensional integralequations, which are better to handle than equations involving d-dimensional k-sums.2.3.1 Interaction-free densities of statesWe will here introduce the density of states (DOS) of the hypercubic lattices in variousspatial dimensions to be able to replace d-dimensional sums by one-dimensional integrals inthe thermodynamic limit as follows:1N∑where the thermodynamic limit meanskf ( ε(k) ) ∫ ∞TD−−→ dεν d (ε)f(ε) , (2.32)lim −∞N → ∞ µ,B = const . (2.33)The replacement of k-sums by energy integrals, as in (2.32), is useful, since in our Hamiltonianthe complete k-dependence is given via ε(k). Here the d-dimensional density of states ν d (ε)is given by:ν d (ε) = 1 ∑δ ( ε − ε(k) ) . (2.34)NkNote that this definition differs slightly from the one which is usually found in literature,where hopping is not (pseudo-)spin-dependent and ¯ε ≡ 2tε is taken as a variable instead ofε. With the help of a Fourier-trans<strong>for</strong>mation the density of states in d-dimensions can beexpressed via Bessel-functions as follows (see [27], [28]):ν d (ε) = 1 π∫ ∞This means <strong>for</strong> the DOS in one- and two-dimensional systems:0dx [ J 0 (x) ] d cos(εx) , (2.35)1ν 1 (ε) =π √ − |ε|) and (2.36)1 − ε2Θ(1 ν 2 (ε) = 1 ( ) ε 2(1π 2K − Θ(2 − |ε|) , (2.37)2)where K(x) is a complete elliptic integral of the first kind and Θ(x) is the unit step function.For the three-dimensional DOS such a simple representation in terms of special functionsdoes not exist and we will calculate it only numerically. The graphs of the DOS in 1 - 3dimensions are sketched graphically in Figures 2.1-2.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!