13.07.2015 Views

Hubbard Model for Asymmetric Ultracold Fermionic ... - KOMET 337

Hubbard Model for Asymmetric Ultracold Fermionic ... - KOMET 337

Hubbard Model for Asymmetric Ultracold Fermionic ... - KOMET 337

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4. NUMERICAL RESULTS 33x-position6421.5246z-position810.510 0nDiff.0.0020.00150.0010.000502x-position46246810z-positionFigure 3.16: Spatial distribution of the parameters n and (n ↑ − n ↓ ) = nm in the x-z-planeat trap parameters: {U = −2, t = 1, µ 0 = 1, B = −0.01, Ω = Diag(0.2,0.3,0.1)}. The orderparameter ∆ vanishes in the whole system and is not shown.We will now discuss the numerical results presented in Figures 3.14 - 3.16. These Figuresdemonstrate that:1. Phase separation occurs: at different lattice sites different phases are found.2. The superfluid polarized phase never occurs.3. We see a shell structure of non-superfluid magnetized and superfluid non-magnetizedrings.4. In Figure 3.14 we have the magnetized phase in the center of the trap, the superfluidring sorrounding it and a magnetized phase in the outer region.5. In Figure 3.15 the magnetized phase in the center is missing, we have a superfluid phasein the center sorrounded by a magnetized phase.6. In Figure 3.16 superfluidity breaks down in the whole system. There is only the magnetizedphase left.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!