DRAFT IS-GPS-705A Comment Resolution Matrix - GPS.gov

IS-GPS-705 CRMCID Originator/Org. Page/Para Importance Comment PO Resolution & Concurrence Notesas specified elsewhere in this document, whichsignifies that the conveying signal may be invalidand should not be used, such as, not Operational-Healthy, Non-Standard Code, parity error, etc. Inthis context, the term URA refers to thecomposite URA, calculated as the root-sumsquaredof the individual URA components in theconveying signal.16 Thomas NagleGPC14 Thomas NagleGPC8 Thomas NagleGPCPage: 41Para: Fig. 20-1Page: 35dPara: Table 6-II(sheet 4 of 6)Page:Para:SSRationale: The Integrity Status Flag is anauthenticated requirement specified in SS-SYS-800, SS-CS-800, and SS-SS-800. Failure to includethe ISF in this ICD before the next OCX RFP willresult in cost impact to the OCX program.Comment: ICD does not define the Integrity StatusFlag. Suggested Change: Add text to paragraph20.3.3.1.1 to describe the Integrity Status Flag asshown in the attached draft PIRN-705-XXX(ISF).From: N/AFinal To: See Figure 20-1Rationale: The Integrity Status Flag is anauthenticated requirement specified in SS-SYS-800, SS-CS-800, and SS-SS-800. Failure to includethe ISF in this ICD before the next OCX RFP willresult in cost impact to the OCX program.Comment: Incorrect “XB code Advance” for I5 PRN153.19PO Resolution: AcceptRationale: 5/23/08 comment and will incorporate intodocument. However, a working group will be createdto discuss further.Concurrence: ConcurRationale:PO Resolution: Reject06/20/08: Changes added to document. 06-sept-09: ICC confirmed that the figureadditions for ISF is in the document.5/23/08: Resolved in a previous comment.Comment withdrawnRationale:From: For I5 PRN 153, change FROM “7912”Concurrence: ConcurFinal To: TO “4912”Rationale:Rationale: Correction.S Comment: PO Resolution: Reject 5/23/2008 Comment Withdrawn