13.07.2015 Views

DRAFT IS-GPS-705A Comment Resolution Matrix - GPS.gov

DRAFT IS-GPS-705A Comment Resolution Matrix - GPS.gov

DRAFT IS-GPS-705A Comment Resolution Matrix - GPS.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IS</strong>-<strong>GPS</strong>-705 CRMCID Originator/Org. Page/Para Importance <strong>Comment</strong> PO <strong>Resolution</strong> & Concurrence Noteslevels apply to GEO orbits.157 Martin/Wang/YiPage: 14 S<strong>Comment</strong>:PO <strong>Resolution</strong>: RejectAerospacePara: 3.3.1.7.3From: The group delay differential between theradiated L5 signal with respect to the EarthCoverage signal for users of the Space ServiceVolume is given by the Block III Space Contractor(TBD). The details are provided in TBD.Final To: Is: (Remove)Rationale: Currently this is a placeholder until the TBDhas been resolved.Concurrence: ConcurRationale:(05/13/09) Accept. Consistency in neededamong the civil specs.158 Martin/Wang/YiAerospacePage: 14Para: 3.3.1.9SRationale: CRM disposition: section should beremoved from this document.<strong>Comment</strong>:From: The transmitted signal shall be right-handcircularly polarized (RHCP). For the angular rangeof ±14.3 degrees from boresight, L5 ellipticity shallbe no worse than 2.4 dB. For Block IIIA theangular range of ±13.8 degrees from nadir, L5ellipticity shall be no worse than 2.4 dB.Final To: Is: The transmitted signal shall be righthandcircularly polarized (RHCP). For the angularrange of ±14.3 degrees from boresight, L5ellipticity shall be no worse than 2.4 dB. For BlockIIIA the angular range of ±13.8 degrees (pluspointing error) from nadir, L5 ellipticity shall be noworse than 2.4 dB. Pointing error is described inparagraph 3.2.8.1.1.3 of SS-SS-800.PO <strong>Resolution</strong>: RejectRationale: The contractor has to meet therequirement inclusive of any pointing errorintroduced by their design.Concurrence: ConcurRationale:(05/13/09) Accept159 C. ChuiAerospacePage: 10Para: 3.3.1.2SRationale: Clairity<strong>Comment</strong>: (1) In the definition of correction loss,it states that the receiver “ideally performslossless correlation”. If that is the case, why a 0.4dB loss is allocated to the correlation receiver? (2)It appears that there are words missing ormisplaced in the 4 lines that define CorrelationLoss Suggested Change: The vehicle payloadPO <strong>Resolution</strong>: A/CRationale: Language is currently being reworked.Concurrence: ConcurRationale:05/01/09: Concur to defer the resolution tothe next ICWG. 10-sept-09: ICC has placedthe language per the corr. Loss tiger team.10/01/09: This section was under rigourousreview and the ultimately the consensus ofthe ICWG community was to revert towording similar to the <strong>IS</strong>-<strong>GPS</strong>-800.59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!