DRAFT IS-GPS-705A Comment Resolution Matrix - GPS.gov

IS-GPS-705 CRMCID Originator/Org. Page/Para Importance Comment PO Resolution & Concurrence Noteswithdrawn. 8/5/09: refer to RIL item fromTBMWG for SSV location resolution.8/13/09: refer to AI #50 for resolution. 10-sept-09: AI #50 was closed. The ICC willwork with comment originator to ensurethat this concern will be addressed with theappropriate document. This follows suitwith the 200 resolution.52 Thomas NagleSComment: There are errors in the “PR” equations PO Resolution: RejectGPC50 Thomas NagleGPCPage: 75Para:20.3.3.3.1.2.2Page: 68Para:20.3.3.2.4SFrom: From “…+ SSVL5 - …”Final To: To “… + c SSVL5 - …” in the 2nd, and 4thequations of this section.Rationale: SSVL5 is the delay bias, therefore, needto convert to the range by multiplying with thespeed of light, c.Comment: Paragraph 20.3.3.2.4 has a couple ofequations for URA_oc. The second one applies if t- t_op > 93,600 seconds.Rationale: need ICWG discussionConcurrence: concurRationale:PO Resolution: RejectRationale: need ICWG discussion11/19/08: Action to GPSW/GPC todetermine where the equations andparameters should be located. Removethese equations and SSV discussion fromthis document. Provide a reference/pointerto the TBD location for this information.Stakeholders concur. Verify with SteveBrown that all appropriate sections havebeen removed. Contact POC for ICD-GPS-240. 30-jul-09: see comment #81, 80 in200 CRM. confirm that comment will bewithdrawn. 83/608: refer to resolution ofcomments 81, 82. 8/5/09: refer to RIL itemfrom TBMWG for SSV location resolution.13-aug-09: GPC concurs with resolution andthis comment is being tracked by the ActionItem 50. 10-sept-09: AI #50 was closed.The ICC will work with comment originatorto ensure that this concern will beaddressed with the appropriate document.This follows suit with the 200 resolution.11/19/08: Comment withdrawnFrom: MUST SEE TEXTFinal To: The second equation is: URA_oc =URA_ocb + URA_oc1 * (t - t_op) + URA_oc2 * (t -t_op - 93,600)^2 The second equation shouldmost likely be: URA_oc = URA_ocb + URA_oc1 * (tConcurrence: ConcurRationale:9