13.07.2015 Views

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CATEGORIFICATION OF DONALDSON-THOMAS INVARIANTS 11and a holomorphic family <strong>of</strong> CS charts V C ⊂ Z C × B over Z C (i.e. V C is a complexanalytic subspace <strong>of</strong> Z C × B) such thatV C × Z C Z = V ⊂ Z × B.Let U ⊂ X be an open subset and V ⊂ U × B be a family <strong>of</strong> CS charts over Uwhich admits local tri<strong>via</strong>lizations. Let U 0 ⊂ U be an open subset and Ψ in (3.4) alocal tri<strong>via</strong>lization <strong>of</strong> V over U 0 .Definition 3.11. We say that the local tri<strong>via</strong>lization Ψ is complexifiable if for anyx ∈ U 0 , there is an open neighborhood x ∈ O x ⊂ U 0 such that if we let V Ox ⊂ O x ×Band Ψ Ox : U Ox → V Ox ×O x , where U Ox = U × U×V O x ×V Ox and Ψ Ox is the pullback<strong>of</strong> Ψ, the following hold:(1) the family V Ox ⊂ O x × B admits a complexification V O C x⊂ O C x × B over acomplexification O C x <strong>of</strong> O x ;(2) there is a holomorphic local tri<strong>via</strong>lization Ψ O C x: U O C x→ V O C x× O C x , i.e.U O C x⊂ O C x × V O C xis open and contains the diagonal ∆(O C x ), such that Ψ O C xis holomorphic,U O C x× O C xO x = U Ox and Ψ = Ψ O C x| U : U Ox → V Ox × O x ⊂ V O C x× O C x .In §5, we will prove the following.Proposition 3.12. Let X ⊂ B si be equipped with preorientation data (∪U α , Ξ α , Ξ αβ ).Then there are(1) a family <strong>of</strong> r-dimensional CS charts V α ⊂ U α × B with complexifiable localtri<strong>via</strong>lizatons at all x ∈ U α ;(2) an open neighborhood U x and a subfamily W x <strong>of</strong> CS charts in V α | Ux foreach x ∈ U α , i.e. a subbundle W x <strong>of</strong> V α | Ux which admits compatible complexifiablelocal tri<strong>via</strong>lizationsU x × V α | Ux ⊃ U Ψ V α | Ux × U x U x × W x | Ux ⊃ U ′Ψ W x | Ux × U x(3) a family <strong>of</strong> CS charts V αβ parameterized by U αβ ×[0, 1] with V αβ | Uαβ ×{0} =V α | Uαβ , V αβ | Uαβ ×{1} = V β | Uαβ , which has complexifiable local tri<strong>via</strong>lizationsat all (x, t) ∈ U αβ × [0, 1], such that V αβ | Ux×[0,1] contains the subfamilyW x × [0, 1] <strong>of</strong> CS charts over U x × [0, 1].We call the above (V α , W x , V αβ ) CS data for X.3.5. Local <strong>perverse</strong> sheaves and gluing isomorphisms. Given CS data, wecan construct <strong>perverse</strong> sheaves P α • on each U α and gluing isomorphisms σ αβ :P α| • Uαβ → Pβ • | U αβ.We will prove the following in §6.Proposition 3.13. (1) Let π : V → U be a family <strong>of</strong> CS charts on U ⊂ X ⊂ B siwith complexifiable local tri<strong>via</strong>lizations at every point x ∈ U. Then the <strong>perverse</strong>sheaves <strong>of</strong> vanishing cycles forcsf x : V x = π −1 (x) ⊂ B si −→ C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!