13.07.2015 Views

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CATEGORIFICATION OF DONALDSON-THOMAS INVARIANTS 13= r 2 + ((r − 1)α 2 1 − 2rα 2 ) + (− α4 112 + α2 2 − α 1 α 3 + 2rδ 4 ) + · · · .Since Y is a Calabi-Yau three-fold, we havetd(Y ) = 1 + 112 c 2(T Y ).Thus by GRR, the torsion-free part <strong>of</strong> the first Chern class <strong>of</strong> (3.5) is(3.7) c 1(det Ext•π (E, E) ) = [ ch(Ext • π(E, E)) ] 1( α 4= π ∗ −112 + α2 2 − α 1 α 3 + 2rδ 4 + ((r − 1)α1 2 − 2rα 2 ) 112 c 2(T Y ) )where [·] 1 denotes the degree one part in A 1 X Q .We now suppose that X is the moduli <strong>of</strong> one dimensional sheaves. Then r = 0and α 1 = 0. Hence (3.7) reduces toc 1(det Ext•π (E, E) ) = π ∗ (α 2 2).We let [α 2 ] be the torsion-free part <strong>of</strong> the image <strong>of</strong> α 2 in H 4 (X × Y, Z). We applythe Künneth formula [34]. By the canonical isomorphism (modulo torsions)H 4 (X × Y, Z)/tor ∼ = [H ∗ (X, Z) ⊗ H ∗ (Y, Z)] 4 /tor.We write [α 2 ] = ∑ 4 ∑i=0 j a i,j ⊗ b 4−i,j , where b 4−i,j ∈ H 4−i (Y, Z), etc. Then[α 2 ] 2 ≡4∑ ∑a i,j ⊗ b i−4,j ∧ a i,j ⊗ b i−4,j ≡ ∑ a 2 2i,j ⊗ b 2 4−2i,j mod 2,ji,ji=0whose part in · ⊗ [Y ] ∨ is tri<strong>via</strong>l. This proves that the torsion-free part <strong>of</strong> (3.7) iseven. More generally, by a similar calculation, it is proved in §9 that the torsion-freepart <strong>of</strong> (3.7) is even for any perfect complex E on X × Y . See Theorem 9.1.Lemma 3.15. Let X be a fine moduli scheme <strong>of</strong> simple sheaves on Y . There is atorsion line bundle L on X = X red with L ⊗k ∼ = O X for some k > 0 such that thepullback <strong>of</strong> det Ext • π(E, E) by the cyclic étale Galois cover X † = {s ∈ L | s k = 1} →X admits a square root L on X † .Pro<strong>of</strong>. Since the torsion-free part <strong>of</strong> c 1 (det Ext • π(E, E)) is even, there is a torsionline bundle L on X such that L ⊗ det Ext • π(E, E) is torsion-free and admits a squareroot. Note that the pullback <strong>of</strong> L to X † is tri<strong>via</strong>l.□For a moduli space X <strong>of</strong> stable sheaves with universal bundle, we can applythe Seidel-<strong>Thomas</strong> twists ([12]) so that we can identify X as a complex analyticsubspace <strong>of</strong> B si . By Theorem 3.14, we have the following.Theorem 3.16. If X is a fine moduli scheme <strong>of</strong> stable sheaves on Y , there exist acyclic étale Galois cover X † → X and a <strong>perverse</strong> sheaf P • on X † which is locallythe <strong>perverse</strong> sheaf <strong>of</strong> vanishing cycles.4. Existence <strong>of</strong> preorientation dataIn this section we prove Proposition 3.4. We construct orientation bundles, theirhomotopies, and their complexifications.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!