13.07.2015 Views

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 YOUNG-HOON KIEM AND JUN LI4.1. The semiconnection space. We continue to use the convention introducedat the beginning <strong>of</strong> Subsection 3.2. Thus, E is the universal family <strong>of</strong> locally freesheaves on X × Y and (E x , ∂ x ) is the restriction E| x×Y , and we use adE x to denotethe smooth vector bundle Ex ∨ ⊗ E x .Since X is quasi-projective, X has a stratification according to the singularitytypes <strong>of</strong> points in X. We fix such a stratification. We say a continuous function(resp. a family) on an open U ⊂ X is smooth if its restriction to each stratum issmooth.We now choose a smooth hermitian metric h on E. Since X is quasi-projective,by replacing E by its twist <strong>via</strong> a sufficiently negative line bundle from X, for asufficiently ample H on Y , we can make E ∨ ⊗ p ∗ Y H generated by global sections,where p Y : X×Y → Y is the projection. Thus for an integer N, we have a surjectivehomomorphism <strong>of</strong> vector bundles O ⊕NX×Y→ E ∨ ⊗ p ∗ Y H; dualizing and untwistingH ∨ , we obtain a subvector bundle homomorphism E ⊂ p ∗ Y H⊕N . We then endow Ha smooth hermitian metric; endow H ⊕N the direct sum metric, and endow p ∗ Y H⊕Nthe pullback metric. We define h to be the induced hermitian metric on E <strong>via</strong> theholomorphic subbundle embedding E ⊂ p ∗ Y H⊕N . For x ∈ X, we denote by h x therestriction <strong>of</strong> h to E x .For the integers s and l chosen before, we denote the L l s-completion <strong>of</strong> Ω 0,k (adE x )by Ω 0,k (adE x ) s . We form the formal adjoint ∂ ∗ x <strong>of</strong> ∂ x using the hermitian metrich x . Then ∂ x and ∂ ∗ x extend to differential operators∂ x (resp. ∂ ∗ x) : Ω 0,k (adE x ) s+1−k → Ω 0,k+1 (adE x ) s−k (resp. Ω 0,k−1 (adE x ) s−k ).We use ker(∂ x ) 0,ks+1−k to denote the kernel <strong>of</strong> ∂ x in Ω 0,k (adE x ) s+1−k ; likewise,ker(∂ ∗ x) 0,ks+1−k. We form the Laplacian□ x = ∂ x ∂ ∗ x + ∂ ∗ x∂ x : Ω 0,k (adE x ) s+1−k → Ω 0,k (adE x ) s−1−k .We denote by □ −1x (0) 0,k the set <strong>of</strong> harmonic forms (the kernel <strong>of</strong> □ x ) in Ω 0,k (adE x ). 1It will be convenient to fix a local tri<strong>via</strong>lization <strong>of</strong> E. Given x 0 ∈ X, we realizean open neighborhood U 0 ⊂ X <strong>of</strong> x 0 as U 0 = X f0 , where (V 0 , f 0 ) := (V x0 , f x0 )is the JS chart. We fix a smooth isomorphism E ≃ E x0 . Since V 0 is a complexmanifold, by shrinking x 0 ∈ V 0 if necessary, we assume that V 0 is biholomorphic toan open subset <strong>of</strong> C n for some n. We let z = (z 1 , · · · , z n ) be the induced coordinatevariables on V 0 . By abuse <strong>of</strong> notation, we also use z to denote a general element inV 0 .Let ∂ 0 + a 0 (z) be the family <strong>of</strong> semiconnections on E <strong>of</strong> the chart (V 0 , f 0 ).Because a 0 (z) satisfies the system in Example 3.7, ∂ z a 0 (z) = 0. Let E V0 = V 0 × E,as a vector bundle over V 0 × Y . Let ∂ z be the ∂-operator along the z direction <strong>of</strong>the product bundle E V0 = V 0 × E. Then ∂ V0 := ∂ 0 + ∂ z + a 0 (z) is a semiconnectionon E V0 . It is known that (cf. [12, Chapter 9], [26]) X f0 = (F 0,2 = 0), which is∂ 0+a 0(z)the same as ((∂ V0 ) 2 = 0) since ∂ z a 0 (z) = 0.Using U 0 = X f0 , the restriction (E V0 , ∂ V0 )| U0 is a holomorphic bundle over U 0 ×Y . By construction, it is biholomorphic to E U0 := E| U0 . Let(4.1) ζ : (E U0 , ∂ V0 | U0 ) −→ E U01 If we don’t put any subscript at Ω 0,·(·), it means the set <strong>of</strong> smooth sections.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!