13.07.2015 Views

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38 YOUNG-HOON KIEM AND JUN LISince ∂F k∂w j(z, 0) involve the partial derivatives <strong>of</strong> the cs <strong>via</strong> the chain rule, we concludethat ∂F k∂w j(z, 0) ∈ I. This proves that F k (z, δ 1 (z), · · · , δ n (z)) − F k (z, 0) ∈ I 2 ,which is (7.4). This proves the Lemma.□Since f 0 −f 1 ∈ I 2 and I = (d V f t ), we can always find a time dependent holomorphicvertical vector field ξ t which satisfies (7.1) and vanishes along X (cf. [5]). Thisgives us the desired biholomorphic map Φ. This completes our pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Theorem7.1. Note that we don’t need Lemma 6.5 for this choice <strong>of</strong> ξ t .Remark 7.4. (Gluing <strong>of</strong> polarization) To use the hard Lefschetz property <strong>of</strong> [30],we also need the gluing <strong>of</strong> polarization and monodromy for M • and the graduationgr W M • . Note that our gluing isomorphisms arise from continuous families <strong>of</strong> CScharts V . Since a continuous variation <strong>of</strong> rational numbers is constant, the obviouspolarizations for the constant sheaves Q V on V is constant in a continuous family<strong>of</strong> CS charts. The induced polarizations on the <strong>perverse</strong> sheaves A • f [r] = φ f Q[r−1],defined in [30, §5.2], are functorial. Therefore the polarizations on A • f[r] glue togive us a polarization on P • . By the same argument, we have a polarization ongr W M • and the monodromy operators also glue .8. Gopakumar-Vafa <strong>invariants</strong>In this section, we provide a mathematical theory <strong>of</strong> the Gopakumar-Vafa invariantas an application <strong>of</strong> Theorem 3.16.8.1. Intersection cohomology sheaf. As before, let Y be a smooth projectiveCalabi-Yau 3-fold over C. From string theory ([9, 15]), it is expected that(1) there are integers n h (β), called the Gopakumar-Vafa <strong>invariants</strong> (GV forshort) which contain all the information about the Gromov-Witten <strong>invariants</strong>N g (β) <strong>of</strong> Y in the sense that∑(8.1)N g (β)q β λ 2g−2 = ∑n h (β) 1 (2 sin( kλ ) 2h−2k 2 ) q kβg,βk,h,βwhere β ∈ H 2 (Y, Z), q β = exp(−2π ∫ β c 1(O Y (1)));(2) n h (β) come from an sl 2 × sl 2 action on some cohomology theory <strong>of</strong> themoduli space X <strong>of</strong> one dimensional stable sheaves on Y ;(3) n 0 (β) should be the <strong>Donaldson</strong>-<strong>Thomas</strong> invariant <strong>of</strong> the moduli space X.By using the global <strong>perverse</strong> sheaf P • constructed above and the method <strong>of</strong> [10],we can give a geometric theory for GV <strong>invariants</strong>.We recall the following facts from [30, 31].Theorem 8.1. (1) (Hard Lefschetz theorem) If f : X → Y is a projectivemorphism and P • is a <strong>perverse</strong> sheaf on X which underlies a pure (polarizable)MHM M • , then the cup product induces an isomorphismω k : p H −k Rf ∗ P • −→ p H k Rf ∗ P •where ω is the first Chern class <strong>of</strong> a relative ample line bundle.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!