13.07.2015 Views

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

Categorification of Donaldson-Thomas invariants via perverse ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 YOUNG-HOON KIEM AND JUN LIThis is a cubic polynomial in a whose quadratic part isCS 2 ( ¯∂ + a) = 14π∫Y2 tr ( 12 ( ¯∂a) ∧ a ) ∧ Ω.Since the directional derivative <strong>of</strong> CS at ∂ + a in the direction <strong>of</strong> b isδ CS(∂ + a)(b) = 14π∫Y2 tr(b ∧ F ¯∂+a 0,2 ) ∧ Ω,δ CS(∂ + a) = 0 if and only if ∂ + a is integrable. Thus the complex analyticsubspace A intsi <strong>of</strong> simple integrable smooth semiconnections in A si is the criticallocus (complex analytic subspace) <strong>of</strong> CS. Let V si = A intsi /G ⊂ B si. Since CS isG-equivariant, it descends tocs : B si → Cwhose critical locus (complex analytic subspace) in B si is V si .3.2. The universal family over X. Let X ⊂ V si ⊂ B be an open complexanalytic subspace and denote by X = X red the X set endowed with the reducedscheme structure. We assume that X is quasi-projective and that there is a universalfamily <strong>of</strong> holomorphic bundles E over X×Y that induces the morphism X → B. Ourconvention is that E is with its holomorphic structure ∂ X implicitly understood.For x ∈ X, we denote by E x = E| x×Y , the holomorphic bundle associated withx ∈ X. We denote by ∂ x the restriction <strong>of</strong> ∂ X to E x . We use adE x to denote thesmooth vector bundle E ∨ x ⊗ E x .We fix a hermitian metric h on E that is analytic in X direction (see §4.3). For x ∈X, we denote by h x the restriction <strong>of</strong> h to E x . Using h x , we form Ω 0,k (adE x ) s , thespace <strong>of</strong> L l s adE x -valued (0, k)-forms. We form the space A x <strong>of</strong> L l s semiconnectionson E x , which is isomorphic to Ω 0,1 (adE x ) s <strong>via</strong> ∂ x +· (cf. (3.1)). We form the adjoint∂ ∗ x <strong>of</strong> ∂ x using the hermitian metric h x .Since Aut(E x ) = C ∗ , a standard argument in gauge theory shows that the tangentspace <strong>of</strong> B at x is(3.2) T x B ∼ = Ω 0,1 (adE x ) s / Im(∂ x ) s∼ = ker(∂∗x) s , x ∈ X,where the first isomorphism depends on a choice <strong>of</strong> smooth E x∼ = E; the secondisomorphism is canonical using the Hodge theory <strong>of</strong> (E x , ∂ x , h x ). (We use the subscript“s” to indicate that it is the image in Ω 0,1 (adE x ) s .) For any open subsetU ⊂ X, we denote T U B = T B| U . Since X ⊂ B is a complex analytic subspace, it isa holomorphic Banach bundle over U.For x ∈ X, we form the Laplacianand its truncated eigenspace□ x = ∂ x ∂ ∗ x + ∂ ∗ x∂ x : Ω 0,1 (adE x ) s → Ω 0,1 (adE x ) s−2 ,Θ x (ɛ) = C-span {a ∈ Ω 0,1 (adE x ) s | ∂ ∗ xa = 0, □ x a = λa, λ < ɛ} ⊂ ker(∂ ∗ x) s .Note that T x X ∼ = ker(□ x ) 0,1s ⊂ Θ x (ɛ) for any ɛ > 0; since (E x , ∂ x , h x ) are smooth,Θ x (ɛ) ⊂ Ω 0,1 (adE x ) (i.e., consisting <strong>of</strong> smooth forms).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!