13.07.2015 Views

211075 Downing Record 07 - Downing College - University of ...

211075 Downing Record 07 - Downing College - University of ...

211075 Downing Record 07 - Downing College - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

underpinned by shared secular experience, Harwood as a physician, Annesley asa trained, though non-practising, lawyer. Of independent means, Annesley hadfrom 1774 held the parliamentary seat <strong>of</strong> Reading; without party affiliation, hisvoting generally supported Pitt’s government. Both the abandoning <strong>of</strong> Wyatt andthe promotion <strong>of</strong> Wilkins had an important context in the Society <strong>of</strong> Antiquaries,London, <strong>of</strong> which Annesley (1759) and Harwood (1783) were long-standingFellows. In the 1790s Wyatt had aroused criticism over his ‘restoration’ <strong>of</strong> severalcathedrals, for which he and several <strong>of</strong> his pupils were blackballed. 2 One victimwas William Porden, another would-be architect <strong>of</strong> <strong>Downing</strong>, whose startlingGothic design for the <strong>College</strong> may be best regarded as a sophisticated lampoon.The successful election <strong>of</strong> Wilkins to a Fellowship in this same period (1800), lendsfurther significance to his connection with Harwood, listed among his sponsors.Yet Wilkins’ selection was far from inevitable. For a significant period in theprocess the more likely candidate had been George Byfield (c.1756–1813), a moremodest practitioner <strong>of</strong> Neo-Greek architecture, and at the time involved in theconstruction <strong>of</strong> several gaols, including that in Cambridge (1802–7). Byfield’s l<strong>of</strong>tyelevation owed much to an alternative network <strong>of</strong> patronage centring onPhilip Yorke <strong>of</strong> Wimpole Hall, 3rd Earl <strong>of</strong> Hardwicke (1757–1834), a majorCambridgeshire landholder and stout Whig, whose family had long exercisedinfluence over the <strong>College</strong>’s destiny. 3 In the 1760s, Philip’s father, Charles Yorke,as <strong>University</strong> MP and government law <strong>of</strong>ficer had played a leading role in pursuingthe <strong>Downing</strong> cause on the <strong>University</strong>’s behalf, efforts halted by his prematuredeath in 1770. Byfield, in addition to his prison work, had undertaken projectsfor Philip’s uncle, the 2nd Earl, also called Philip (1720–90). Byfield’s proponentswithin the <strong>College</strong> were also indebted to the 3rd Earl’s patronage. The Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<strong>of</strong> Law, Edward Christian (remarkably the brother <strong>of</strong> Fletcher Christian, leader <strong>of</strong>the mutiny on the Bounty) had also been a counsel for the <strong>Downing</strong> cause andhad advanced almost every step <strong>of</strong> his career through the Yorkes’ protection andsupport. Byfield’s other supporter was Dr William Craven, Reader in Arabic, whoas Master <strong>of</strong> St John’s not only had special responsibilities under the <strong>College</strong>’sCharter, but also held a position nominated by the 3rd Earl’s uncle, James Yorke,bishop <strong>of</strong> Ely.The question was further complicated by a third focus for support, in LewisWyatt (c.1788–1853), nephew <strong>of</strong> James Wyatt, whose work Hope had socondemned. The design, in a light Neo-Greek style, was Lewis’ first for a major2. J. Evans, A History <strong>of</strong> the Society <strong>of</strong> Antiquaries (1956), pp. 204–14. I am grateful to the Society’sAssistant Librarian, Adrian James, for supplying some further details <strong>of</strong> Fellowship elections.3. Also a Fellow <strong>of</strong> the Society <strong>of</strong> Antiquaries (1791), and patron <strong>of</strong> Sir John Soane; for Philip’seducation and Grand Tour, see P. Searby, A History <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, III: 1750–1870(1997), 545–61.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!