the <strong>University</strong> Printer, Mr Watts, and dedicated to the Vice-Chancellor and Heads<strong>of</strong> Houses. On completion <strong>of</strong> the ceremony, the <strong>University</strong> contingent processedback to the Senate House. Then at four o’clock the Vice-Chancellor and some sixtyor seventy Doctors and <strong>University</strong> Officers, including the Earl <strong>of</strong> Hardwicke,reassembled at the Red Lion for an ‘Entertainment’ hosted by the <strong>College</strong>.After nearly forty years’ toil for the <strong>Downing</strong> cause, how had Annesley securedthis most belated <strong>of</strong> triumphs? Thanks to important work by former Fellow TimHochstrasser, we now have a clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> the delicate complexitieswhich dogged any fulfilment <strong>of</strong> Sir George <strong>Downing</strong>’s will. 7 Never cut and dried,the struggle against Lady <strong>Downing</strong> and her heirs may be better understood as athree-way conflict, rapidly enervating rivalry over the fate and leadership <strong>of</strong> theprospective <strong>College</strong>. Central to this was the rather awkward position <strong>of</strong> the heirsat-law,whose involvement Charles Yorke, acting for the <strong>University</strong>, hadstrenuously opposed. 8 Whether the will was upheld or not, the heirs-at-law hadbeen effectively disinherited by its terms: any role would not only underline this,but potentially expose the bearer to suspicion <strong>of</strong> personal gain. Annesley wasperhaps the best equipped <strong>of</strong> the family members to evade such perils. His wealth,owning houses in Reading and Mayfair, appeared to limit any financial interestin a nascent <strong>College</strong>; unmarried, and a learned amateur and connoisseur, he<strong>of</strong>fered interests credibly suited to collegiate leadership. In addition to hisactivities in the Society <strong>of</strong> Antiquaries he was a renowned bibliophile, with a largecollection <strong>of</strong> classical literature, and held a position as hereditary Trustee <strong>of</strong> theBritish Museum (then still in its old building, Montagu House) through hisgrandfather, the Cottonian librarian William Hanbury.In his political and other worthy responsibilities, Annesley’s career appears tohave been punctuated by declarations <strong>of</strong> his own incorruptibility and rectitude,rooted in the basis <strong>of</strong> his support as MP for Reading, a previously venal borough.Yet behind these seemingly straightforward gestures, one may suspect the grip<strong>of</strong> a well connected and sometimes shrewd political operator. His position inReading hinged on the connections <strong>of</strong> his brother, Martin, in the town’scorporation; he also paid his election expenses direct. Annesley’s dealings withthe Yorkes may well have had a further dimension within the British Museum, animportant arena <strong>of</strong> Hardwicke patronage during the Trusteeship <strong>of</strong> the 2nd Earl(1753–90) and 3rd Earl (from 1802). 9 Annesley’s competing activities could,moreover, be convenient, well shown both in this rivalry and in his ultimateretirement from the Reading seat in 1806. In 1780, when approached by the 2nd7. Hochstrasser, ‘“A <strong>College</strong> in the Air’”, esp. pp. 84–97.8. Ibid., pp. 91–7.9. A. Esdaile, The British Library: a Short History and Survey (1946), pp. 18, 33 and 323; D. M. Wilson,The British Museum: a History (2002), pp. 28, 33 and 37.27
Earl to give support to his nephew, Philip Yorke (the future 3rd Earl) as prospectiveMP for Cambridgeshire, Annesley declined, ironically pleading that ‘my presentconnection with the <strong>Downing</strong> Estate does not, I fear, with any propriety, give mea right to interfere’. 10 The statement may be a poor guide to Annesley’s actualmethods: in time, as Master <strong>of</strong> <strong>Downing</strong>, he appears to have drawn supportamounting to a balance <strong>of</strong> power within the <strong>College</strong>. In addition to BusickHarwood, there was the lawyer Frere (1775–1836), very possibly a deliberatecounter-weight to the Yorkes’ man Christian. Perpetually ambitious, Frere hadbeen a late inclusion in the <strong>College</strong>’s Charter, an alteration seemingly securedthrough the influence <strong>of</strong> his brother George, who in 1797 joined Forster andCooke, the legal partners who had long represented the <strong>Downing</strong> heirs-at-law.Another ally was again Annesley’s brother, Martin, rapidly granted thereceivership <strong>of</strong> the <strong>College</strong>’s estates.There was however one battle which Annesley seems to have lost. AsHochstrasser has shown, early plans for the <strong>College</strong> reveal that, remarkably, fromthe late 1770s onwards both Annesley and the <strong>University</strong> authorities appear tohave envisaged a <strong>College</strong> lacking undergraduates, perhaps consciously evokingthe precedent <strong>of</strong> All Souls, Oxford. 11 The idea seems to have emerged as a messypath <strong>of</strong> least resistance satisfying, severally, the <strong>University</strong>’s goals <strong>of</strong> additionalsalaried posts for teaching purposes; Annesley’s priorities <strong>of</strong> lay and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalFellowships; and financial constraints from the diminishing resources <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Downing</strong> estates. Only in 1796 did a new draft Charter refer to resident juniormembers; this appears to have been a further compromise for Annesley, nowsatisfying the Court <strong>of</strong> Chancery over the full and proper use <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Downing</strong>legacy, connected with a final settlement with the heirs <strong>of</strong> Lady <strong>Downing</strong> overrent arrears. 12 Indeed, much <strong>of</strong> the Court’s subsequent power over the GoverningBody lay in its direct control <strong>of</strong> the <strong>College</strong>’s building fund, a measure designedto ensure appropriate expenditure on construction. Yet, quite apart from the law’sdepredations, the <strong>Downing</strong> estates were in poor shape, suffering from neglectand chronic under-investment. In practice Wilkins’ building costs were barely metby the <strong>College</strong>’s income, and, initially, Annesley and his colleagues were forced t<strong>of</strong>orego their stipends, which the Charter had designated at generous levels, with£100 per year for a Fellow, £200 for a Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, and £600 for the Master.It is revealing to observe the <strong>College</strong>’s operation in response to these pressures,played out against all earlier tensions over its future shape. For whereas Annesleyhad the means to be benevolent, others may not have been so well placed: Frerefor one regarded his stipend as central to his social advancement, alongside his10. Letter quoted by Hochstrasser, ‘“A <strong>College</strong> in the Air’”, pp. 96–7.11. Ibid., pp. 97–106.12. Ibid., p. 106.28
- Page 1 and 2: Downing College 2007
- Page 4: ContentsDowning College Association
- Page 7 and 8: The President. Julian Childs MA
- Page 9 and 10: President’s ForewordThe aim durin
- Page 11 and 12: Cufflinks in solid silver£68 plus
- Page 13 and 14: understanding! The music recitals i
- Page 15 and 16: 14Fellowship and students in reside
- Page 17 and 18: e hung! I was also honoured and del
- Page 19 and 20: Development Director’s ReportThe
- Page 21 and 22: ‘Smaller’ building tasks includ
- Page 23 and 24: 1807: The Laying of the Foundation
- Page 25 and 26: underpinned by shared secular exper
- Page 27: the digging out of foundations; the
- Page 31 and 32: and other residents. This is the sc
- Page 33 and 34: The Schieffelin Leprosy Research &
- Page 35 and 36: proposed the establishment of a Boa
- Page 37 and 38: DIECI PER TAVOLA GRANDE(Ten for Hig
- Page 39 and 40: sailors’ attempts to steer in a s
- Page 41 and 42: Act 5Scene 1: Near MarchThe final A
- Page 43 and 44: The Literary Larrikin (biography) -
- Page 45 and 46: MarriageAndrew Macintosh (2003) mar
- Page 47 and 48: ObituariesStephen Allcock (1952)Ste
- Page 49 and 50: papers and Oral English, examining
- Page 51 and 52: But he hankered after something to
- Page 53 and 54: Claire Louise Cutler, née Morgan,
- Page 55 and 56: John Raynes (1954)We learned from J
- Page 57 and 58: Martin Ward (1957)Martin Ward came
- Page 59 and 60: Editorial acknowledgementsThis publ
- Page 62: Downing College2006 - 200761
- Page 65 and 66: IAN RICHARD JAMES, M.A., M.A. (Warw
- Page 67 and 68: The Wilkins FellowsGODFREY MICHAEL
- Page 69 and 70: James Norman Birch (Fellow Emeritus
- Page 71 and 72: Memorial service for the late Dr St
- Page 73 and 74: 200 Years the Symbiotic Architectur
- Page 75 and 76: 74In contrast, Jefferson was a Pall
- Page 77 and 78: The consequence was that when Jeffe
- Page 79 and 80:
In December 2006 Ian Roberts was aw
- Page 81 and 82:
Women’s BadmintonThe first team b
- Page 83 and 84:
Semi Final). It was a pleasure to s
- Page 85 and 86:
Music SocietyPresident: Mark Browne
- Page 87 and 88:
competition for the fourth time in
- Page 89 and 90:
Scholarships, prizes and awards 200
- Page 91 and 92:
College prizesArchaeology & Copsey
- Page 93 and 94:
ArchitectureTripos Part IALeung M Y
- Page 95 and 96:
Land Economy Tripos Part IAManji I
- Page 97 and 98:
Natural Sciences Tripos Part IACart
- Page 99 and 100:
Graduate examinationsDiploma in Com
- Page 101 and 102:
LawBailey-Munroe, S JBansal, N KBel
- Page 103 and 104:
Graduate admissions 2006Anglo-Saxon
- Page 105 and 106:
Loizidou, C CLoo, T MMargaronis, S