13.07.2015 Views

AHMEDABAD - Gbic.co.in

AHMEDABAD - Gbic.co.in

AHMEDABAD - Gbic.co.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS:-There is no doubt that he was <strong>in</strong>sured under policy no. 344172297 under Jeevan Asha- IIplan no 131-25 for SA of Rs.5.00 lakhs w.e.f 28.09.2003. It is also proved that heunderwent Non-Hodgk<strong>in</strong>’s lymphoma (Cancer) treatment for which he has undergone theoperation for biopsy on 12.03.2008.As per the said policy <strong>co</strong>ndition under the head COMMON EXCLUSIONS FOR BOTHMAJOR AND MINOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES, the operation for biopsy is not qualifythe payment. Hence, the decision taken by the respondent is just & fair requires no<strong>in</strong>terventions.The <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t is dismissed without any relief.Category – Refund of PremiumShri Halke Lal Sen …………………………….. Compla<strong>in</strong>antV/SLIC of India, Jabalpur.…………………………………...…….RespondentOrder No.BPL/LI/09-10/54Order dated 19.10.2009CASE NO. LI/07-23/04-09/JBPBrief BackgroundShri Halke Lal Sen, Resident of Hatta, Dist. Damoh (M.P.) <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t that hehas taken a Policy bear<strong>in</strong>g No. 371443466 and 371703077 each of Rs.50,000/- on 15-12-1998 and 15-01-2000 which was matured andpayment was made to him but the premium paid <strong>in</strong> excess Rs. 2874/-was not refunded to him. Despite of several <strong>co</strong>rrespondence therespondent has not refunded the same.Aggrieved from the action of respondent Compla<strong>in</strong>ant has lodged the<strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t on dt.23-04-09 to the Hon’ble ombudsman seek<strong>in</strong>g direction tothe Respondent for payment of Rs. 21874.00.The Respondent represented by Shri Sudhakar Mehta, Manager (Claims)Jabalpur submitted that the payment was already made to the<strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant on 12-10-2009 vide their cheque no. 5274 dated 12.10.2009for Rs. 2874.00. Hence the <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t may be dismissed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!