For an efficient multimodal system, the different transport systems have to becoordinated to accomplish intermodal transport. Multimodal planning focuses onsystem choices, whereas intermodal planning emphasises the most efficient way ofmoving from point to point through the system (Meyer, 1992: 6).Cooperative agreements between private operators and state-owned interest formthe basis for such an intermodal service. Apart from being involved in providing thephysical and administrative infrastructure, government is also partially involved inorganisations such as Transnet, who are responsible for particular transport services(Department of Public Enterprise, 2002).Chapter three deals with the intermodal evolution, the advantages of intermodalism,and the deregulation of the industry. This will be followed by the evolution andintegration of containerisation. Thereafter, consideration will be given to whatknowledgeable people have to say about the intermodal industry in the NMMM, andhow this can be linked to the theory of competitive advantage discussed in Chaptertwo.3.2 THE INTERMODAL EVOLUTIONThe concept of logistically linking two or more modes of transport may be centuriesold, but the wider use of this form of transport has developed fully only over the last fewdecades. Intermodal transport has become a major growth industry in South Africasince the mid 1960’s, and has led to a reduction in transport costs and improvedlogistics worldwide. Intermodalism is thus not a new concept, but is novel in its refinedform. Historically, the crossing of rivers had to be accomplished by utilising means oftransport different from those used for overland transport. Where land-waterboundaries caused a change in the means of locomotion, an intermodal exchangehad to take place. This simplified view on intermodality formed the basis for the78
development of a highly specialized field of transport. It first revolutionised thetransport interface between the marine and overland modes. More recently,intermodal systems have been widely applied between the rail and road modes, tothe benefit of both.D’Este (1996:1) stresses that an intermodal system is much more than the physicalmovement of goods and its associated direct cost.He maintains that it is more useful to define intermodalism as a technical, legal,commercial and management framework for moving goods from door-to-door, usingmore than one mode of transport. This definition emphasises that intermodalism is aservice rather than a technology. To achieve the fluent, seamless service needed forintermodal transport, a standard unit of transport was required. Containerisationprovided this freight unit, using international standard containers (Joubert, 1998: 4).3.3 ADVANTAGES OF INTERMODALISMIntermodalism offers several advantages (Martinez, 1992:48). Firstly, inter-modalismconnects, implying the convenient, rapid, efficient and safe transfer of people orgoods from one mode to another during a single journey, to provide the highest qualityand most comprehensive transportation service for the given cost. Secondly,intermodalism allows choice via the provision of transportation options throughcompetition among different modes, independently or in combination. Thirdly,intermodalism allows co-ordination and cooperation among transportationorganisations, to improve the transportation service, quality, safety and efficiency forall modes or combinations of modes .The true advantage of intermodalism is thus theability to logistically and effectively link two or more modes of transportation for thebenefit of customers and users (Department of Transport, 1996a: 1).Collenette (2003:4), the Canadian minister of transport, states that intermodalism is79
- Page 1 and 2:
THE IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS THAT
- Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSI hereby wish to ex
- Page 5 and 6:
protection, human resource developm
- Page 7 and 8:
2.3.4 Competitive rivalry 372.4 SOU
- Page 9 and 10:
4.3.3.1 Section one : Demographics
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 2.1 Porter’s diamond 13Fig
- Page 14 and 15:
LIST OF ANNEXURESPAGEAnnexure A Cov
- Page 16 and 17:
Mandela Metropolitan Municipality (
- Page 18 and 19:
activities at comparable cost but i
- Page 20 and 21:
core competences of establishing de
- Page 22 and 23:
Firms in every industry have some u
- Page 24 and 25:
• A survey was carried out in the
- Page 26 and 27:
surprise that the freight transport
- Page 28 and 29: Source: Hill (2002: 159)According t
- Page 30 and 31: attractiveness of a country as a pl
- Page 32 and 33: generalised factor would be a pool
- Page 34 and 35: The second determinant of Porter’
- Page 36 and 37: This is because firms compete globa
- Page 38 and 39: (c)Anticipatory buyer needsA countr
- Page 40 and 41: the service or product buyer needs.
- Page 42 and 43: arely a complete substitute, even i
- Page 44 and 45: firm’s strategy, structure and ri
- Page 46 and 47: Porter (1990:117) says domestic riv
- Page 48 and 49: means of identifying the forces whi
- Page 50 and 51: ased economies, and their trade pol
- Page 52 and 53: transport, it is frequently economi
- Page 54 and 55: for the purpose of this study.Figur
- Page 56 and 57: According to Strickland and Thompso
- Page 58 and 59: cost advantage. Successful cost lea
- Page 60 and 61: 2.5.4 Shifting input costs or avail
- Page 62 and 63: eduction is regarded as essential t
- Page 64 and 65: Organisations that move fastest dow
- Page 66 and 67: and Strebel and Porter has, however
- Page 68 and 69: options available to organisations.
- Page 70 and 71: 2.7.1.2 The hybrid strategy - route
- Page 72 and 73: Source : Slack et al (2001 :116)The
- Page 74 and 75: • Marketing-based approaches: Her
- Page 76 and 77: difficult if the organisation compe
- Page 80 and 81: good for all. It is anti-congestion
- Page 82 and 83: to another while in transit from or
- Page 84 and 85: also road movements, were performed
- Page 86 and 87: insurance rates for all parties.•
- Page 88 and 89: distributed to everyone involved or
- Page 90 and 91: subject to the same terms and condi
- Page 92 and 93: TEU's handled at the Port of Port E
- Page 94 and 95: as many other long term transport a
- Page 96 and 97: encourage foreign direct investment
- Page 98 and 99: 2002.The estimated volume of contai
- Page 100 and 101: CHAPTER FOURTHE EMPIRICAL STUDY AND
- Page 102 and 103: 4.2.2 Types of researchSekaran (200
- Page 104 and 105: In evaluating the questions asked,
- Page 106 and 107: Leedy (1997:191) states that a comm
- Page 108 and 109: The researcher was of the opinion t
- Page 110 and 111: monetary value to the intermodal tr
- Page 112 and 113: The size of customers, proximity of
- Page 114 and 115: Section two dealt with the factors
- Page 116 and 117: The South African intermodal indust
- Page 118 and 119: From Table 4.10, the following inte
- Page 120 and 121: • Ninety one percent of the respo
- Page 122 and 123: • One hundred percent support was
- Page 124 and 125: Investment cost in the intermodal i
- Page 126 and 127: espondents shows that favourable tr
- Page 128 and 129:
• Eighty two percent of responden
- Page 130 and 131:
5.3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 132 and 133:
solutions.• The shipping lines ne
- Page 134 and 135:
the intermodal industry, have led t
- Page 136 and 137:
understand and to deliver enhanced
- Page 138 and 139:
prices or a better service from an
- Page 140 and 141:
adequate skills, especially in fund
- Page 142 and 143:
transporter should have in creating
- Page 144 and 145:
One of the goals of the National Tr
- Page 146 and 147:
• Excellent quality service for e
- Page 148 and 149:
CIMEC. 2000. Annual report 1999/200
- Page 150 and 151:
Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S.E., Sloc
- Page 152 and 153:
Mattheus, B. 2002. Nelson Mandela M
- Page 154 and 155:
Strickland, A. & Thompson, A. 1999.
- Page 156 and 157:
19 May 2003For Attention:………
- Page 158 and 159:
Structured interview on the competi
- Page 160 and 161:
Section 2: Factors promoting compet
- Page 162 and 163:
Section 3 : Competitive advantagePl
- Page 164 and 165:
Section 5: Advantages and challenge