13.07.2015 Views

B'Tselem report: Crowd Control: Israel's Use of Crowd Control ...

B'Tselem report: Crowd Control: Israel's Use of Crowd Control ...

B'Tselem report: Crowd Control: Israel's Use of Crowd Control ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

issued separately by Israeli police, interviews with commanders, and media<strong>report</strong>s. These secondary sources are used because the IDF does not publicizeits riot control procedures due to the procedures' level <strong>of</strong> classification.8. As a result <strong>of</strong> B'tselem's reliance on secondary sources, the authors <strong>of</strong> the<strong>report</strong> frequently include inaccuracies and conjectures. The authors' lack <strong>of</strong>clarity regarding the issue ultimately led to the portrayal <strong>of</strong> only a partialpicture in their <strong>report</strong>.9. In addition, the <strong>report</strong> is replete with irresponsible conclusions drawn frominstances still under investigation, while ignoring the fact that many <strong>of</strong> theirclaims regarding specific incidents were closed without the need for anycriminal investigation, while others which were opened for investigationwere subsequently closed due to failure to find evidence indicating criminalaction on behalf <strong>of</strong> IDF forces, or the refusal <strong>of</strong> the complainants tocooperate with the investigation (including refusals to provide testimony toinvestigating authorities).In response to the <strong>report</strong>'s specific claims:10. The conclusions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>report</strong> rest on faulty factual and normativefoundations. This is especially true regarding the main conclusion <strong>of</strong> the<strong>report</strong>- that the IDF's <strong>of</strong>ficial Rules <strong>of</strong> Engagement and safety procedures arenot clearly formulated and that ultimately prevents their properimplementation. Considering that B'tselem does not actually have in itspossession a copy <strong>of</strong> those <strong>of</strong>ficial rules and procedures, this conclusion isbaseless.11. All IDF soldiers who use crowd dispersal equipment undergo extensivetraining and preparation aimed at ensuring that they have mastered all therelevant <strong>of</strong>ficial instructions and procedures.12. We emphasize the fact that allegations <strong>of</strong> a violation <strong>of</strong> the Rules <strong>of</strong>Engagement are examined thoroughly by the IDF Military Advocate General'sCorps.. Criminal military investigations are opened if it is deemed necessary,in accordance with the IDF Military Advocate General's Corps investigationpolicy. 113. The IDF utilizes an array <strong>of</strong> less lethal weapons with the aim <strong>of</strong> not onlyreducing injury to surrounding people but also with the aim <strong>of</strong> reducing injuryto the rioters themselves. All crowd dispersal equipments used by the IDF hasbeen approved for usage by senior military commanders, as well as by theIDF Medical Corps and the IDF International Law Department. For example,1 This policy has been approved by <strong>Israel's</strong> Supreme Court sitting as the High Court <strong>of</strong> Justice. See HCJ9594/03 B'tselem et al v. The Military Advocate GeneraL, 2011 (3) 3136.53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!