4.4. Additional ProductsThe products in this category do not fit into either one of the previous categories of fly ashproducts or Class N products. This is due to the suppliers’ requests to modify the ASTM C 1567test to accommodate the evaluation of their materials. TXI Inc. submitted a lightweight fineaggregate, Holcim submitted a product called GranCem and FMC-Euclid Chemical submittedlithium nitrate admixture. The data information on the TXI lightweight sand and FMC-EuclidChemical’s lithium nitrate can be found in Appendices D and B respectively.4.4.1. HolcimHolcim’s GranCem material is a granulated blast slag cement that is ground into a fine powder,to be mixed with water and Portland cement. Because of this, the GranCem material is claimedto provide ASR and sulfate resistance, low permeability and lower heat of hydration. GranCemwas tested at 35%, 40% and 50% replacement of cement and had expansions at 14 days of0.26%, 0.17% and 0.04% respectively. These bars turned into a very dark green color as the barswere soaked in the sodium hydroxide solution. However, no color changes were observed in theconcrete mix. The expansion results dictated a cement replacement level of 46% in the mixdesign.21
5. CONCRETE PHYSICAL PROPERTIESAll of the materials tested for ASR expansion mortar bar tests were tested as modifications to theapproved Class D mix design. The three expansion tests indicated a replacement level of cementthat would yield an expansion of less than 0.10% at 14 days. This replacement level was used tomodify Grand Junction Ready Mix’s CDOT Class D mix with the following specifications: 0.44max w/c ratio, 5-8% air content, 615 to 660 pounds of cementitious, and 4,500 psi fieldcompressive strength at 28 days. All of the concrete batch information stayed the same, whilevarying the pozzolans in the mixes. Because of the varying properties of the pozzolans, the batchwater per cubic yard could not be held constant.Instead, the water was adjusted for all the mixes. Almost all the mixes showed no air entrainmentwhen tested. The amount of air entraining admixture recommended by Grand Junction ReadyMix design was even doubled in an effort to get the air content up, but this was still not effective.Later, when confirming the approved mix design, the air entrainment listed was 1.0 ounce (oz.)per cubic yard, when the actual amount needed was 5.3 oz. per cubic yard. Because slump wasnot achieved from air, there are varying swings of w/c ratios. Each mix had air, slump andcylinders cast. The cylinders were tested for compressive strength at 7, 28, and 56 days whilesome cylinders were also used for rapid chloride permeability tests (permeability measured at 56days will typically be lower than specimens tested at 28 days), the raw data results from this testhad to be modified in accordance with the standard, because of the use of a non-standarddiameter test specimen. All testing was performed in general accordance with the applicableASTM standards. All mix design sheets can be found in Appendix E. The individual mixes arediscussed below with the data summarized in Table F.5.1. Baseline CDOT Mix DesignThe San Juan generating station Class F had a slump of 6 inches, air content of 2.0%, and a unitweight of 145.2 pcf. This slump was achieved with a w/c ratio of 0.47. However, with theconsideration of less batch water, the mix would still be very workable and the maximum w/cratio of 0.44 could be easily maintained. The compressive strength values were 3,200 psi, 5,080psi, and 6,570 psi at 7, 28, and 56 days, respectively. The rapid chloride permeabilities of thespecimens were 4,816 and 4,903 coulombs with an average of 4,860 coulombs.22
- Page 1 and 2: Report No. CDOT-2008-10Final Report
- Page 3 and 4: 1. Report No.CDOT-2008-10Technical
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe staff at J.A. C
- Page 7 and 8: Materials other than either Class N
- Page 9 and 10: APPENDICESAPPENDIX A - STATE METAKA
- Page 11 and 12: CP-L 4202 1 . Once the effectivenes
- Page 13 and 14: 1. Lowering the pH of the concrete
- Page 15 and 16: Recently, different cement manufact
- Page 17 and 18: metakaolin, an 8% replacement of ce
- Page 19 and 20: Table 3. KAOROCK ion penetrability.
- Page 21 and 22: educe its amount in the cement past
- Page 23 and 24: 3.2. IllinoisThe Illinois Departmen
- Page 25 and 26: eplacement of portland cement shoul
- Page 27 and 28: Bridger and Coal Creek power plants
- Page 29: and 0.03% respectively at 14 days.
- Page 33 and 34: 5.3. Metakaolin ProductsAll of the
- Page 35 and 36: 5.4.1. HolcimThe GranCem product fr
- Page 37 and 38: 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONST
- Page 39 and 40: 13. Nasvik, Joe. “Using Metakaoli
- Page 41 and 42: note 4 Silicon dioxide (SiO2) plus
- Page 43 and 44: APPENDIX C: MORTAR BAR EXPANSION TE
- Page 45 and 46: APPENDIX D: TXI LIGHTWEIGHT SAND AD
- Page 47 and 48: APPENDIX E: MIX DESIGN INFORMATIONJ
- Page 49 and 50: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 51 and 52: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 53 and 54: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 55 and 56: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 57 and 58: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 59 and 60: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 61 and 62: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 63 and 64: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 65 and 66: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 67 and 68: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 69 and 70: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 71 and 72: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co
- Page 73 and 74: J.A. Cesare & Associates, Inc. / Co