13.07.2015 Views

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

366 The Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterlyplann<strong>in</strong>g, Mao emphasized, should now be oriented toward <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong>national defence, to prepare for a com<strong>in</strong>g war with <strong>the</strong> imperialists.35The escalation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong> <strong>War</strong> <strong>in</strong> late <strong>1964</strong> thus triggered aprofound transformation of <strong>the</strong> entire structure of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> national economy.Follow<strong>in</strong>g Mao's ideas, <strong>the</strong> CCP Central Committee discussed <strong>the</strong>need to establish a "Headquarters for National Economy and NationalDefence," with Mao Zedong and Liu Shaoqi as its co-commanders. Byearly 1965, a large portion of <strong>the</strong> coastal <strong>in</strong>dustry had begun to move <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner areas, and <strong>the</strong> emphasis of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> economic developmentchanged from agriculture and light <strong>in</strong>dustry to heavy <strong>in</strong>dustry, particularly<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sectors related to <strong>the</strong> military build-up.36 All this touched upon<strong>the</strong> everyday life of a large portion of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> population (especially <strong>in</strong>coastal areas), fur<strong>the</strong>r radicaliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> society and politics and thusfollow<strong>in</strong>g Mao's <strong>in</strong>tentions.Work<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> Specifics of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> Support to <strong>Vietnam</strong>, Late <strong>1964</strong> toEarly 1965The security commitments Beij<strong>in</strong>g had previously offered Hanoi weregiven <strong>in</strong> general terms. It was thus necessary, <strong>in</strong> late <strong>1964</strong> and early 1965,for Beij<strong>in</strong>g's leaders to def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> specifics of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> support to <strong>Vietnam</strong><strong>in</strong> light of both <strong>the</strong> country's domestic and <strong>in</strong>ternational needs as perceivedby Mao and <strong>the</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g situation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>. While do<strong>in</strong>g so,<strong>the</strong>ir th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g had been <strong>in</strong>fluenced by <strong>the</strong> lessons of <strong>the</strong> Korean <strong>War</strong>, aswell as by <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> Americans would also learn from <strong>the</strong>irexperience <strong>in</strong> Korea. Consequently, by <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g of 1965, when policymakers <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton decided to send more troops to South <strong>Vietnam</strong> andbegan operation "Roll<strong>in</strong>g Thunder," Beij<strong>in</strong>g's leaders had decided onthree basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong> formulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> strategy. First, if <strong>the</strong> Americanswent beyond <strong>the</strong> bomb<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> North and used land forces to<strong>in</strong>vade North <strong>Vietnam</strong>, Ch<strong>in</strong>a would have to send military forces. Secondly,Ch<strong>in</strong>a would give clear warn<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> Americans, so that <strong>the</strong>ywould not feel free to expand military operations <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> North, let aloneto br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> war to Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Thirdly, Ch<strong>in</strong>a would avoid direct militaryconfrontation with <strong>the</strong> United States as long as possible; but if necessary,it would not shr<strong>in</strong>k from a confrontation.37Under <strong>the</strong> guidance of <strong>the</strong>se pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, Beij<strong>in</strong>g sent out a series ofwarn<strong>in</strong>gs to Wash<strong>in</strong>gton <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 1965. On 25 March, <strong>the</strong> officialRenm<strong>in</strong> ribao (People's Daily) announced <strong>in</strong> an editorial that Ch<strong>in</strong>a wasto offer "<strong>the</strong> heroic <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese people any necessary material support,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> supply of weapons and all k<strong>in</strong>ds of military materials,"and that, if necessary, Ch<strong>in</strong>a was also ready "to send its personnel tofight toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese people to annihilate <strong>the</strong> American35. Cong J<strong>in</strong>, Quzhe qiangj<strong>in</strong> de sh<strong>in</strong>ian, p. 465; and Naughton, "The Third Front," p. 353.36. Cong J<strong>in</strong>, Quzhe qiangj<strong>in</strong> de sh<strong>in</strong>ian, p. 46.37. Interviews with Beij<strong>in</strong>g's military researchers, August 1992.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!