13.07.2015 Views

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

382 The Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterlysuddenly at <strong>the</strong> very last moment, claim<strong>in</strong>g that nei<strong>the</strong>r Liu Shaoqi norDeng Xiaop<strong>in</strong>g had been authorized to speak for <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Party. He<strong>in</strong>sisted that <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union had become <strong>the</strong> most dangerous enemy of<strong>the</strong> peoples of <strong>the</strong> world and called for <strong>the</strong> establishment of an "anti-imperialistand anti-revisionist <strong>in</strong>ternational united front."86 Mao would laterrelate this event to his earlier criticism of Wang Jiaxiang, charg<strong>in</strong>g thatboth Liu and Deng had become <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> "revisionists." Mao's criticism ofLiu's and Deng's handl<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Miyamoto mission became <strong>the</strong> first signto <strong>the</strong> outside world that profound division had emerged among top CCPleaders. As it soon turned out, both Liu and Deng would become <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>targets of <strong>the</strong> Cultural Revolution.So far as its impact on Ch<strong>in</strong>ese-<strong>Vietnam</strong>ese relations is considered, <strong>the</strong>failure of <strong>the</strong> Miyamoto mission fur<strong>the</strong>r distanced Hanoi from Beij<strong>in</strong>g.Beij<strong>in</strong>g's leaders, while feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly uneasy about Hanoi's lack of<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g a distance from Moscow, noted with surprise that <strong>the</strong><strong>Vietnam</strong>ese media began to use <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> <strong>in</strong>vasion of <strong>Vietnam</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pastto spur patriotism among ord<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese people. Conv<strong>in</strong>ced that <strong>the</strong><strong>Vietnam</strong>ese were <strong>in</strong> fact <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed toward Moscow, Beij<strong>in</strong>g's leaders weregenu<strong>in</strong>ely offended.87Among Ch<strong>in</strong>ese sources now available, two cases <strong>in</strong>dicate that sharpdifferences had emerged <strong>in</strong> 1966 between Beij<strong>in</strong>g and Hanoi as <strong>the</strong> resultof Hanoi's improv<strong>in</strong>g relations with Moscow. The first details <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong>reaction to Hanoi's gestures of friendship toward Moscow. In March1966, Le Duan led a <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese Party delegation to attend <strong>the</strong> SovietParty's 23rd Congress. He reportedly once described <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union ashis "second mo<strong>the</strong>rland." When Beij<strong>in</strong>g's leaders learned of this, <strong>the</strong>ywere "angrily shocked." A few months later, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese requestedthat <strong>the</strong> second division of <strong>the</strong> CPVEF stay longer <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong> after it hadcompleted its orig<strong>in</strong>al assignments, but <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese turned down <strong>the</strong>request and <strong>the</strong> second division returned to Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> July 1966. OneCh<strong>in</strong>ese source po<strong>in</strong>ts out that this move was designed to demonstrateBeij<strong>in</strong>g's anger toward Le Duan's praise of <strong>the</strong> Soviets <strong>in</strong> Moscow.88The second case more directly reveals Ch<strong>in</strong>ese resentment of Hanoigiv<strong>in</strong>g any priority to <strong>the</strong> Soviets. In early 1966, a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese cargo ship,Hongqi (Red Flag), was assigned to carry materials <strong>in</strong> aid to <strong>Vietnam</strong>. As<strong>the</strong> ship approached <strong>the</strong> Hai Phong port it was stopped so that a Sovietcargo ship, which arrived later than <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, could enter <strong>the</strong> port first.As <strong>the</strong> result of this delay, Hongqi was exposed to an American air raidand was severely damaged. Dur<strong>in</strong>g a visit to Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> April, Le Duan86. For a detailed record of Miyamoto's visit to Ch<strong>in</strong>a and <strong>Vietnam</strong> <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 1966, seeMasaru Kojima (ed.), The Record of <strong>the</strong> Talks between <strong>the</strong> Japanese Communist Party and<strong>the</strong> Communist Party of Ch<strong>in</strong>a: How Mao Zedong Scrapped <strong>the</strong> Jo<strong>in</strong>t Communique (Tokyo:The Central Committee of <strong>the</strong> Japanese Communist Party, 1980).87. In a meet<strong>in</strong>g with Lu Duan <strong>in</strong> April 1966, Zhou Enlai mentioned that <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hadnoted that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese media had recently streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>the</strong> propaganda about <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong><strong>in</strong>vasion of <strong>Vietnam</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past. Zhou warned that such propaganda had violated <strong>the</strong>fundamental <strong>in</strong>terests of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese people <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir common struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st<strong>the</strong> U.S. imperialists. Guo M<strong>in</strong>g et al., Zhong-Yue guanxi yanbian sish<strong>in</strong>ian, p. 102.88. See Wang Xiangen, Kang Mei yuanyue shilu, p. 225.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!