The Green Paper for Vulnerable Children - Ministry of Social ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Concerns about evidence-based funding: A small minority of submissions expressed concernsabout evidence-based funding. These submissions were concerned assessment could bereduced to a tick-box exercise. Their main concern was that holistic, qualitative outcomes andcultural values are not easily measured with mainstream evaluation and monitoring techniques.Some submissions expressed concern small-scale localised approaches could be disadvantagedif funding was dependant on evidence. Similarly some were concerned that practice-basedknowledge may be marginalised by privileging scientific evidence.No, because what you consider evidence is a form of scientific relativism; and whatyou consider “results” is probably dubious in its foundation. The goal is not simply tostop abuse but to facilitate healthy parenting practices. The perspective of govt is toosuperficial....and politically reactionary. (general public)Evidence in cultural contexts: Some submissions stressed the importance of researching andunderstanding cultural aspects of social service provision.In order to achieve the objectives of Whānau Ora, it is vital that culturally distinctapproaches to violence intervention and prevention are supported and evaluated. It isimportant that policies designed to address family violence, including agency responsesand practices, are also culturally appropriate and respond to the needs of Pacific Island,Asian and other ethnic groups. (community meeting)Many Māori and Pacific programmes are grounded in identified cultural needs andpreferences. They may not have a mainstream evidence base due to a lack of research,so appropriate monitoring and evaluation systems are particularly important.(other organisation)Vulnerable child-first allocation policyThe Green Paper and its associated questionnaires asked five questions about havinga vulnerable child-first allocation policy.• Is it appropriate that all Government agencies promote and prioritise the wellbeingof vulnerable children in their day-to-day work?• Should some people get priority over others when allocated support and services becausethey are caring for vulnerable children?• What priority should the Government give to the families and whānau of those caring forvulnerable children when allocating services that impact on the children they are caring for?• When should adults who care for vulnerable children be prioritised for services over others?• What services do you think should be included in this policy?120 Make Child-Centred Policy Changes
SummaryPrioritising carers, family and whānau of vulnerable children: Submissions were generallyin support of prioritising services to the carers of vulnerable children. Supporters argued thosecaring for vulnerable children need to be looked after in order for children to have the bestpossible outcomes. Many submissions argued non-parental carers of vulnerable children,such as grandparents and foster parents, needed more support.What services and when: The most commonly suggested services to target to carers ofvulnerable children were health services, early childhood education, addiction services, financialassistance and social housing. Most submissions argued support and prioritisation should beoffered on a case-by-case basis when it was observed carers were unable to meet children’sbasic needs for health and safety.Practice Changes Policy Changes Show Leadership Share Responsibility Children / Young People Executive SummaryThe Green Paper for Vulnerable Children Full Summary of Submissions121
Page 2 and 3:
Published by the Ministry of Social
Page 4:
Ministerial forewordWhen I launched
Page 9 and 10:
MethodologyHow submissions were ana
Page 12 and 13:
The role of government: Children an
Page 15 and 16:
Features of an action plan: Some su
Page 17 and 18:
Make child-centred policy changesTh
Page 19 and 20:
Mandatory reporting: A small number
Page 21 and 22:
Improving service deliveryWe want t
Page 23 and 24:
The community and government: In th
Page 25 and 26:
What does it mean to thrive, belong
Page 27 and 28:
When abuse is occurring: A minority
Page 29 and 30:
A third party that would act as a m
Page 31 and 32:
What kind of information can be sha
Page 33 and 34:
A good school, with good teachers w
Page 35 and 36:
Children and young people: Free-for
Page 37 and 38:
Meet their physical needs: Adults s
Page 39:
SchoolsChildren and young people wa
Page 42 and 43:
Lower taxes, increase income: Relat
Page 44:
Listen to usI reckon adults should
Page 47 and 48:
Q&AParents and caregivers:Question
Page 49 and 50:
There must be better financial supp
Page 51 and 52:
Clearly something is wrong because
Page 53 and 54:
When a child is notified or abuse i
Page 55 and 56:
The gap between rich and poor is to
Page 57 and 58:
Mental health: A small minority of
Page 59 and 60:
I would love to see a strengthening
Page 61 and 62:
Increase community action on child
Page 63 and 64:
Not allowing alcohol to be readily
Page 65 and 66:
Some submissions specified the poss
Page 67 and 68:
Supporting familiesMoney and resour
Page 69 and 70:
Through paid employment: A minority
Page 71 and 72: This theme was raised by a large mi
Page 73 and 74: Other submissions echoed the idea o
Page 75 and 76: We believe that the primary respons
Page 77 and 78: Show leadershipAn important element
Page 79 and 80: Q&AA Vulnerable Children’s Action
Page 81 and 82: Raise awareness: A minority said an
Page 83 and 84: • Improving education.Fund altern
Page 85 and 86: A Vulnerable Children’s Action Pl
Page 87 and 88: Goals and actions for a Vulnerable
Page 89 and 90: School ageEducation: A small minori
Page 91 and 92: Q&ALegislation changes:Question and
Page 93 and 94: What other actions or principles wo
Page 95 and 96: Other: A small minority of submissi
Page 97 and 98: • reviewing child support provisi
Page 99 and 100: families in. Service-based strategi
Page 101 and 102: Vulnerable Māori children need to
Page 103 and 104: What could be improved to ensure th
Page 105 and 106: Are the children aggressive (there
Page 107 and 108: Work in partnership to deliver serv
Page 109 and 110: Similar to the question and answer
Page 111 and 112: Reallocating funding: Submissions c
Page 113 and 114: Reduce funding when not child-centr
Page 115 and 116: • new motorways and bike tracks
Page 117 and 118: Review government spending to get b
Page 119 and 120: Support for universalism: A small m
Page 121: MSD has funded a vast array of inte
Page 125 and 126: • prioritisation should be consid
Page 127 and 128: What services do you think should b
Page 129 and 130: • carers needed a realistic, live
Page 131 and 132: Q&AWatching out for vulnerable chil
Page 133 and 134: Ten years ago I would have said “
Page 135 and 136: This should be managed by key peopl
Page 137 and 138: What negative consequences are impo
Page 139 and 140: How much personal information shoul
Page 141 and 142: Under what circumstances should the
Page 143 and 144: Health professionals: A small minor
Page 145 and 146: As much as is fiscally practical. I
Page 147 and 148: from community meetings, other orga
Page 149 and 150: The ‘one child-one-record’ syst
Page 151 and 152: needs assessment, culture, mental h
Page 153 and 154: Removing funding and contractual ba
Page 155 and 156: Need to link agencies that have peo
Page 157 and 158: To support New Zealand families we
Page 159 and 160: The primary level services Plunket
Page 161 and 162: Q&ABetter connecting vulnerable chi
Page 163 and 164: All services should feed through sc
Page 165 and 166: Improving service deliveryThe Green
Page 167 and 168: What other opportunities exist to d
Page 169 and 170: Practice ChangesPolicy Changes Show
show all

The Green Paper for Vulnerable Children - Ministry of Social ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?