Recent Applications of Hydrofoil-Supported- Catamarans - Boat ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

42. RECENT HYSUCAT APPLICATIONS (1998/01)Stingray Marine developed a 12m fast Interceptor as a Navy Patrol Boat. The fully ladencraft weighs 13.5t and is propelled by twin Caterpillar diesel engines with 2 x 320kW.The propulsion is by twin Arneson surface drive systems with Teignbridge (U.K.) surfacepropellers. The contract speed was 35 knots, the prototype reached 42 knots fully ladenin sea trials off Cape Town. Three units have been delivered in 1998 to a foreign Navy.The Interceptor has a so-called Avion Hydrofoil system designed by Prof. K.G. Hoppe atthe University of Stellenbosch and contracted by Unistel Technologies, the University’stechnology transfer company. (See Hysucat Web page: www.unistel.com).The following Hysucat application in 1998, which was completed with successful trials inEngland, is the conversion of the well-known Panther 64 by Prout Catamarans Ltd inthe U.K.. The Panther 64 is a luxury yacht of nearly 20m with 35t displacement. It hasfully asymmetrical demi-hulls similar to deep Vee planing hulls for good rough waterperformance. The straight tunnel between the hulls with nearly vertical sidewalls offersvery favourable flow conditions for a hydrofoil system. The overall beam is 6.7m with atunnel width of 2.85m allowing a main foil with reasonable aspect ratio to be fitted.The Panther 64 is propelled by twin 850kW MTU diesel engines driving two Parkerwaterjets built by Vosper Thornycraft, so called Vos-jets. The waterjets allow trimadjustments of the craft at speed by means of adjustable exit nozzles, which makesthese jets especially useful in a Hysucat application.Figure 2: The Prout Panther 64
5The avion type Hysucat foil system used, was developed by Prof. K.G. Hoppe at theUniversity of Stellenbosch and contracted through Unistel Technologies, the UniversitiesTechnology Transfer company. The foil system was optimized by use of the numericalmodel, which had been validated in many previous applications, by use of physicalmodels and prototype sea-trial back feed data.It was therefore not necessary to perform tank testing on the Panther hull although it isusually strongly recommended. The main foil was built of high tensile stainless steel byMaitland Metal Fabricators, Cape Town. The stern foils were cast in aluminium bronzeand accurately machined and ground to a high quality surface finish. The foils wereshipped to the UK where they were installed on the Panther 64 after initial sea trialswithout the foils. This way the improvement due to the foil system could be determinedaccurately.It was a welcome procedure for the designer who had encountered strong disbelief inhis 40% performance improvement prediction. Without foils, the Panther 64 reached29 to 30 knots (occasionally) with a displacement of 32.5t in the initial sea trials over themeasured mile on the Thames estuary. A week later with foils fitted the Panther 64showed up with a top speed of 44 knots over the same mile and weight but includingthe foils (33.5t). Fully tanked and equipped it ran 42 knots with 35t.The average improvement in top speed, therefore, was in excess of 40%. No otherchanges had been made to the craft. Certain further speed improvements are stillfeasible when the underwater fittings such as water intakes and exits and echo sounderinstallation are adapted to the new top speed and are further streamlined. The generalhull finish can be further improved by use of smooth anti-fouling paints.In a previous publication in FAST FERRY International, see Hoppe (1991), aperformance comparison method of ships was developed which resulted in the so calledpower ratioe p = p b /? [t] * 9.8 * V [knot] * 0,5144which gives a dimensionally clean physical performance comparison. It was found thatthe e p = 1 / ? Twith ? Tbeing the well known transport efficiency.The smaller the e p value of a craft build-up with the top performance data the moreefficient is the craft. Usually the e p increases for ships operating at larger FroudeDisplacement NumbersFnD = V / ? g * ? 0.333.The diagram Figure 4 of Hoppe (1991) gives many different craft e p values aside oftendency curves over Froude number. It can be used for direct comparisons of a designproposal with successful craft.The power ratio e p of the Prout Panther without foils is e p = 0,346 at FnD = 2,76.
Page 1 and 2: Newsletterwww.tsbp.state.tx.us FALL
Page 3: 3Making use of the so-called hydrof
Page 7 and 8: 7A hydrodynamic stabilizer system w
Page 9 and 10: 9tunnel between the demi-hulls give
Page 11 and 12: 11Figure 6: The E-Cat foil at speed
Page 13 and 14: 13Another foil system was developed
Page 15 and 16: 15However, the trials in Chile only
Page 17 and 18: 173. CONCLUSIONThe hybrid of a cata
Page 19: 19Stumbo S. (2000), Wake Measuremen

Recent Applications of Hydrofoil-Supported- Catamarans - Boat ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?