13.07.2015 Views

Auckland Philharmonia Orchestra - the Auckland Philharmonia

Auckland Philharmonia Orchestra - the Auckland Philharmonia

Auckland Philharmonia Orchestra - the Auckland Philharmonia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fur<strong>the</strong>r CORE funding <strong>the</strong> APO’s ability to respond to demand for this grass‐roots level ofengagement with <strong>the</strong> community is severely compromised.The depth of community support and connection can also be demonstrated by APO's new SistemaAotearoa programme that could only have been successfully implemented in Otara due to <strong>the</strong> factthat APO's Remix <strong>the</strong> <strong>Orchestra</strong> programme, Connecting With Music initiative and APOPS PartnershipSchool programme had already built relationships in this community. The <strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>Philharmonia</strong> isin <strong>Auckland</strong> all year, has multiple opportunities to offer contact for students and adult audiences,and has a tight feedback chain to hear what its public think of it.In <strong>the</strong> Fall 2011 edition of Symphony, <strong>the</strong> magazine of <strong>the</strong> League of American <strong>Orchestra</strong>s, Leaguepresident Jesse Rosen writes of an increasing need to serve a wide cross‐section of communities. Heargues that sustaining and growing this community need has never been more important. Thepresident of <strong>the</strong> Milwaukie Symphony says “Getting Community Engagement right will involveorchestras re‐thinking <strong>the</strong>mselves from top to bottom as cultural service agencies ra<strong>the</strong>r than highendentertainment companies.” 3<strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>Philharmonia</strong> <strong>Orchestra</strong> has understood this for years, and with <strong>the</strong> launch of APOConnecting in 2011, formalised this dimension of its offer as being core business.However, <strong>the</strong> issue here is that <strong>the</strong>re is demand for more of this outreach than APO can meet withcurrent hand‐to‐mouth resources of <strong>the</strong>se programmes, which run very lean.To expand <strong>the</strong> programme to meet current and projected demand would require increased corefunding on which <strong>the</strong> organisation can depend and with which it can plan with confidence.7 Player­related issues<strong>Auckland</strong> audiences expect, demand and deserve high standards from <strong>the</strong>ir resident orchestra. It isdifficult for APO to attract and retain players to meet this increasing demand for technical expertiseand mastery for several reasons, specifically:7.1 Earning levels and core fundingAPO is limited to paying players below <strong>the</strong> going rate for professional orchestras. Common practicefor paying wages of orchestra members is to use core funding for this core operating expense. TheAPO derives its core funding from two sources: <strong>Auckland</strong> Council (25%) and central government (viaCreative New Zealand) (24%). This totals 49% of APO's revenue. This is in stark contrast to o<strong>the</strong>r cityorchestras and to <strong>the</strong> New Zealand Symphony <strong>Orchestra</strong>, which enjoy a bedrock of funding supportand can remunerate (and programme) accordingly.The issue here is that APO receives relatively less core funding from central government than o<strong>the</strong>rcity symphony orchestras and <strong>the</strong>refore finds it harder to attract and retain top players.3 Symphony, Fall 2011, P17Contextualising <strong>Auckland</strong> and <strong>the</strong> NZ orchestral sector <strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>Philharmonia</strong> <strong>Orchestra</strong> Page 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!