13.07.2015 Views

new synonymies and combinations for orb-weaving

new synonymies and combinations for orb-weaving

new synonymies and combinations for orb-weaving

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Zootaxa 2073: 22–30 (2009)www.mapress.com/zootaxa/Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia PressArticleISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)ZOOTAXAISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)Not from “Down Under”: <strong>new</strong> <strong>synonymies</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>combinations</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>orb</strong>-<strong>weaving</strong>spiders (Araneae: Araneidae) erroneously reported from AustraliaVOLKER W. FRAMENAU 1,2,5 , NIKOLAJ SCHARFF 3 & HERBERT W. LEVI 41Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia, 6986, Australia.E-mail: volker.framenau@museum.wa.gov.au2School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia3Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen,Denmark: E-mail: nscharff@snm.ku.dk4Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. E-mail: levi@fas.harvard.edu5Corresponding authorAbstractThe examination of type material of presumed Australian <strong>orb</strong>-<strong>weaving</strong> spiders as part of a revision of the Araneidae ofthis country revealed that a number of species are not from Australia. The Natural History Museum, Vienna (Austria)holds the type material of three species of <strong>orb</strong>-<strong>weaving</strong> spiders that were originally described from Australia, however allof the species are undoubtedly of American, most likely southern Brazilian, origin <strong>and</strong> it is unlikely that they werecollected in Australia. We propose the following <strong>synonymies</strong> <strong>and</strong> generic transfers: Acacesia tenella (L. Koch, 1871)comb. nov. (= Acacesia cornigera Petrunkevitch, 1925 <strong>new</strong> synonymy); Alpaida navicula (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov.(= Alpaida roemeri (Str<strong>and</strong>, 1908) <strong>new</strong> synonymy); <strong>and</strong> Eustala mucronatella (Roewer, 1942) comb. nov. In addition,Novearanea queribunda (Keyserling, 1887) comb. nov. (= Araneus quaesitus (Keyserling, 1887) <strong>new</strong> synonymy; =Novaranea laevigata (Urquhart, 1891) <strong>new</strong> synonymy) is a New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>orb</strong>-<strong>weaving</strong> spider based on the labels thatwere found with the type specimens housed at the Natural History Museum, London (Engl<strong>and</strong>). In the originaldescription no locality data was given <strong>for</strong> N. queribunda <strong>and</strong> “Australien” was erroneously listed <strong>for</strong> A. quaesitus.Key words: New Holl<strong>and</strong>, Neuholl<strong>and</strong>, Brazil, Nearctic, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, <strong>new</strong> combinationIntroductionColonialism by the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s from the 17 th into the 20 th century resulted in many localities world-widebearing names of Dutch origin. New Holl<strong>and</strong> (initially “Nova Holl<strong>and</strong>ia”) is a historic name <strong>for</strong> Australiagiven by the seafarer Abel Tasman who named it after the Dutch province of Holl<strong>and</strong> (Sharp 1968). Butbetween 1624 <strong>and</strong> 1664 parts of northeastern Brazil (Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e do Norte to Bahia states) were also referredto as “Nova Hol<strong>and</strong>a” <strong>and</strong> localities in Acre <strong>and</strong> Rondônia <strong>and</strong> many hotels <strong>and</strong> lodgings in northeasternBrazil are still named Nova Hol<strong>and</strong>a (with various spellings). Today there is also a municipality, VilaHol<strong>and</strong>a, in São Paulo <strong>and</strong> a favela, Nova Hol<strong>and</strong>a, in Rio de Janeiro (E. Buckup personal communication).There is also a village in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil, with the name Nova Holl<strong>and</strong>ia (A.A. Lise personalcommunication) <strong>and</strong> there are at present six New Holl<strong>and</strong> post offices in the United States.Consequently, historic specimens simply labeled “New Holl<strong>and</strong>” (“Neuholl<strong>and</strong>” in German) are difficultto correctly associate to a locality without geographic reference. Two of three species of <strong>orb</strong>-<strong>weaving</strong> spiders,of which the type material is lodged at the Natural History Museum in Vienna, were included in historicaccounts of the Australian fauna based on their collection labels reading “Neuholl<strong>and</strong>”, Araneus tenellus (L.Koch, 1871) <strong>and</strong> Araneus mucronatellus (Roewer, 1942) (originally described as Epeira mucronata L. Koch,1871) (L. Koch 1871). A third species, Araneus navicula (L. Koch, 1871), was also thought to be from22 Accepted by G. Hormiga: 7 Mar. 2009; published: 16 Apr. 2009


Australia based on the original locality label “Sidney”, mistaken <strong>for</strong> the Australian settlement Sydney. Recentexamination of the type material of these species revealed that they are not of Australian origin, butundoubtedly belong to the American fauna.Keyserling (1887) described two species of Araneidae, Araneus queribundus (Keyserling, 1887) <strong>and</strong>Araneus quaesitus (Keyserling) which in past <strong>and</strong> current catalogs (Roewer 1942; Bonnet 1955; Platnick2009) are listed as Australian. The type material of both species is lodged at the Natural History Museum,London, <strong>and</strong> is clearly labeled “New Zeal<strong>and</strong>”. We were able to identify both species as belonging to the NewZeal<strong>and</strong> genus Novaranea Court & Forster, 1988.MethodsSpiders were examined in ca. 70% ethanol under different Leica stereomicroscopes. Images of MNHW typeswere taken in different focal planes with a Nikon D300 digital SLR camera attached via a C-mount adapterfrom LM-Scope (http://www.lmscope.com/index_e.html) to a Leica M16A stereomicroscope <strong>and</strong> combinedwith Auto Montage (vers. 5.02) software from Syncroscopy to increase depth of field. We used 2 Nikon R1C1wireless speedlights instead of fiber optics to illuminate the exposures. The latter were used as guide-light <strong>for</strong>focusing. The photograph of the male syntype of Epeira queribunda was taken with a Canon G6 digitalcamera through the ocular tube of the microscope provided by the BMNH.AbbreviationsAMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, USABMNH The Natural History Museum, London, Engl<strong>and</strong>MNHN Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, FranceNHMW Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna, AustriaPMY Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USASMF Naturmuseum und Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt/Main, GermanyTaxonomyAcacesia tenella (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov.Figs 1A–D, 2A–EEpeira tenella L. Koch, 1871: 76–78, pl. 6, figs 5, 5a, 6, 6a; Butler 1876: 352.Aranea tenella (L. Koch). Roewer 1942: 834.Wixia tenella (L. Koch). Archer, 1951: 15.Araneus tenellus (L. Koch). Rainbow 1911: 194; Bonnet 1955: 609.Acacesia cornigera Petrunkevitch, 1925: 117, figs 32–41; Glueck, 1994: 73–75, figs 2–3, 9–16. New synonymy.Types. Syntypes of Epeira tenella L. Koch, 1871: 1 male, 5 females, 1 penultimate female, 1 juvenile, listedin L. Koch (1871) from “Neuholl<strong>and</strong>” (NHMW 1826.II.11) (examined).Syntypes of Acacesia cornigera Petrunkevitch, 1925: male, female, juvenile, San Lorenzo, Panama (PMY)(examined).Remarks. Ludwig Koch (1871) listed 1 male <strong>and</strong> 9 females as syntypes in his original description ofEpeira tenella (p. 78, “Neun entwickelte Weibchen und ein Männchen von Neuholl<strong>and</strong> ohne nähere Angabeim k. k. Museum zu Wien.”), but the vial only contained the 8 specimens listed above. This also coincideswith a copy of the NHMW register which lists 8 specimens. It appears that L. Koch (1871) erroneously listed9 females <strong>and</strong> also misinterpreted the developmental stage of some of the spiders.NEW SYNONYMIES FOR ORB-WEAVING SPIDERSZootaxa 2073 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 23


FIGURE 1. Syntype male <strong>and</strong> female of Acacesia tenella (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov. A, male, dorsal view; B, maleright pedipalp, mesal view; C, female, dorsal view; D, epigyne, ventral view. Scale bar: A, C, 1 mm; B, D, 0.1 mm.Acacesia cornigera was reported as widespread from central Mexico to southern Brazil <strong>and</strong> is found onboth sides of the Andes (Glueck 1994). The species has quite variable male pedipalps <strong>and</strong> the posterior viewof the epigynum is generally heavily sclerotised <strong>and</strong> sometimes covered with debris <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e difficult toexamine; the female illustrated here has apparently recently moulted with less sclerotised epigyne (Figs 1D,2B). All males from Mexico to Brazil have similar cone-shaped emboli, although it may be hidden in part bythe conductor. The paracymbium is variable, Central American specimens have two distal prongs, theproximal short, the South American generally have only one (Fig. 2D). However, there is little doubt that thesyntypes of Epeira tenella <strong>and</strong> those of Acacesia cornigera represent the same species <strong>and</strong> both aresynonymised here as Acacesia tenella (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov.24 · Zootaxa 2073 © 2009 Magnolia PressFRAMENAU ET AL.


Based on the locality label “Neu-Holl<strong>and</strong>” L. Koch (1871) erroneously assumed that the spiders werecollected in Australia. It is possible that the spiders were collected in the Dutch colony of the same name innortheastern Brazil, although this colony had long seized to exist when the specimens were given to theMNHW in 1826.FIGURE 2. Syntype female <strong>and</strong> male of Acacesia tenella (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov. A, female, dorsal view; B,epigyne, ventral view; C, epigyne, posterior view; D, paracymbium of left male pedipalp, dorsolateral view, E, male leftpedipalp, mesal view. Scale bar: A, 1 mm; B–E, 0.1 mm.Alpaida navicula (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov.Figs 3A–BEpeira navicula L. Koch, 1871: 102–103, pl. 8, figs 4, 4a, 4b.Aranea roemeri Str<strong>and</strong>, 1908: 3; Str<strong>and</strong> 1916: 109. New synonymy.Araneus naviculus (L. Koch). Rainbow 1911: 189; Roewer 1942: 830; Bonnet 1955: 548.Araneus roemeri Str<strong>and</strong>. Petrunkevitch 1911: 312; Mello-Leitão 1927: 400; Roewer 1942: 851; Bonnet 1955: 586.Alpaida roemeri (Str<strong>and</strong>). Levi, 1988: 469–470, figs 551–554.Types. Holotype of Epeira navicula L. Koch, 1871: female, labeled “Sidney” <strong>and</strong> “collected by Novara”(NHMW 1866.I.10) (listed in L. Koch (1871) from Sydney, 33º53’S, 151º13’E, New South Wales, Australia)(examined).Holotype Aranea roemeri Str<strong>and</strong>, 1908: female, Joinville [Joinvile] [26º19’S, 48º52’W, Santa Catarina,Brazil], W. Ehrhardt, 1906 (SMF 3380) (examined).Remarks. A comparison of the holotype of Epeira navicula with the holotype of Alpaida roemeriundoubtedly supports a synonymy of both species; we can not see any differences in somatic <strong>and</strong> genitalicNEW SYNONYMIES FOR ORB-WEAVING SPIDERSZootaxa 2073 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 25


morphology between the two specimens that warrant a recognition as separate species. We there<strong>for</strong>e transferAraneus naviculus to Alpaida, A. navicula (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov. <strong>and</strong> consider it a senior synonym of A.roemeri. The species is currently only known from the holotype collected in southern Brazil (Levi 1988), <strong>and</strong>the type locality “Sydney” published by L. Koch (1871) must be considered erroneous. The register of theMNHW lists “Sidney” as locality <strong>and</strong> “collected by Novara”, presumably referring to the Novara-Expedition(1857–1859), a circumnavigation of the globe by the Austrian Imperial war navy that visited both SouthAmerica <strong>and</strong> Australia (Treffer 1973).FIGURE 3; Holotype female of Alpaida navicula (L. Koch, 1871) comb. nov. A, dorsal view; B, epigyne, ventral view.Scale bar: A, 2 mm; B, 0.1 mm.Eustala mucronatella (Roewer, 1942) comb. nov.Figs 4A–HEpeira mucronata L. Koch, 1871: 74–76, pl. 6, figs 2, 3, 3a; Butler 1876: 352; Karsch 1878: 789; (preoccupied by Epeiramucronata Blackwall, 1862).Aranea mucronatella Roewer, 1942: 830 (replacement name).Araneus mucronatus (L. Koch). Bonnet 1955: 547.Types. Syntypes of Epeira mucronata L. Koch, 1871: 2 penultimate males, 4 females, listed in L. Koch(1871) from “Neuholl<strong>and</strong>” (NHMV 1826.II.3) (examined).Description. Female bleached, only bare indication of pattern on abdomen (Figs 4A, B). Abdomenpointed posteriorly with two posterior humps (Fig. 4E). Eyes subequal in size. Anteriors 1.2 their diameterapart, 2.2 from laterals. Posterior median eyes their diameter apart, 2.0 from laterals. Total length 4.6 mm.Carapace 1.9 mm long, 1.7 mm wide. First Femur 2.2 mm; third metatarsus 1.4 mm (most leg articles lost).Remarks. Somatic <strong>and</strong> genital morphology (Figs 4A-H), in particular the shape of the epigynal scapewhich projects anteriad (Figs 4F–H) leave no doubt that Araneus mucronatellus is a member of the Americangenus Eustala to which we transfer it here: Eustala mucronatella comb. nov. The species is similar to Eustalataquara (Keyserling, 1892) described from Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e do Sul, Brazil (see Levi 2007), but E. mucronatelladiffers by an additional abdominal hump between the posterior hump <strong>and</strong> the spinnerets, by a pointedepigynum scape (that of the type of E. taquara is blunt) <strong>and</strong> the shorter distance between the posterioropenings of epigyne (Figs 4F–H). Pending a revision of the genus Eustala <strong>and</strong> the examination of additionalspecimens, there is a possibility that E. mucronatella is a variable specimen of E. taquara.26 · Zootaxa 2073 © 2009 Magnolia PressFRAMENAU ET AL.


FIGURE 4. Syntype females of Eustala mucronatella (Roewer, 1942) comb. nov. A, dorsal view; B, another female,abdomen, dorsal view; C, abdomen, ventral view; D, epigyne, ventral view; E, abdomen, lateral view; F, epigyne, ventralview; G, epigyne, lateral view; H, another epigyne, ventral view. Scale bar: A–C, E, 1 mm; D, F–H, 0.1 mm.NEW SYNONYMIES FOR ORB-WEAVING SPIDERSZootaxa 2073 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 27


Novaranea queribunda (Keyserling, 1887) comb. nov.Fig. 5Epeira queribunda Keyserling, 1887: 195–197, pl. 17, figs 4, 4a, b, 5. 5a, b.Epeira quaesita Keyserling, 1887: 197–198, pl. 17, figs 6, 6a. New synonymy.Epeira laevigata Urquhart, 1891: 171–172, pl. 21, fig. 6; Urquhart 1892: 227. New synonymy.Araneus quaesitus (Keyserling). Rainbow 1911: 191; Bonnet 1955: 580.Araneus queribundus (Keyserling). Rainbow 1911: 191; Bonnet 1955: 580.Aranea laevigata (Urquhart). Roewer 1942: 829.Aranea queribunda (Keyserling). Roewer 1942: 832.Aranea quaesita (Keyserling). Roewer 1942: 832.Araneus laevigatus (Urquhart). Bonnet 1955: 526.Novaranea laevigata (Urquhart). Court & Forster 1988: 114–115, figs 361, 539–552.Types. Lectotype (here designated) of Epeira queribunda Keyserling, 1887: male, New Zeal<strong>and</strong> [no exactlocality] (BMNH 1890.7.1.4134) (examined).Paralectotype of Epeira queribunda Keyserling, 1887: female, same data as lectotype (BMNH1890.7.1.4135) (misidentification; this specimen is Colaranea verutum (Urquhart, 1887) (examined).Holotype of Epeira quaesita Keyserling, 1887: female, New Zeal<strong>and</strong> [no exact locality], BradleyCollection (BMNH 1890.7.1.4163) (examined).Holotype of Epeira laevigata Urquhart, 1891: female, <strong>for</strong>est near Strat<strong>for</strong>d [39º20’S, 174º17’E, NewZeal<strong>and</strong>], A.T. Urquhart (lost; Court & Forster 1988) (not examined).Remarks. In his original description, Keyserling (1887) did not mention a type locality <strong>for</strong> Araneusqueribundus but Rainbow (1911, p. 191) listed “Hab.–Australia” <strong>for</strong> this species. This was later perpetuatedas distribution by Roewer (1942) <strong>and</strong> Bonnet (1955). Our examination of the syntype male <strong>and</strong> female in theBMNH revealed that the specimens are clearly labeled “New Zeal<strong>and</strong>” which was omitted in Keyserling’s(1887) description. Comparison with New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Araneidae illustrated by Court <strong>and</strong> Forster (1988) showedthat both male <strong>and</strong> female syntype of Epeira queribunda represent two different species. To providenomenclatural stability <strong>for</strong> the species concept of E. queribunda, the male is here designated as lectotype. Themale pedipalp morphology, in particular the shape of the terminal apophysis of this species, is unique withinthe New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Araneidae <strong>and</strong> clearly the same as that of Novaranea laevigata (Urquhart, 1891), the typespecies of the monotypic genus Novaranea Court & Forster, 1988 (Fig. 5; see also Court & Forster 1988, figs546–547). There<strong>for</strong>e Araneus queribundus is here transferred to Novaranea <strong>and</strong> considered a senior synonymof Novaranea laevigata: Novaranea queribunda (Keyserling, 1887) comb. nov. The female syntype(paralectotype) of Epeira queribunda is Colaranea verutum (Urquhart, 1887).Examination of the holotype of Epeira quaesita revealed through the original label, that this specimen wasalso collected in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> not in Australia as originally stated by Keyserling (1887, p. 198:“Australien, Sammlung Bradley”). The morphology of the epigyne clearly con<strong>for</strong>ms to that of Novaraneaqueribunda comb. nov. as illustrated in Court & Forster (1988, sub N. laevigata; see above) who also state(pg. 115): “The loss of the type [of Epeira laevigata] is <strong>for</strong>tunately of little importance because Urquhartillustrated the epigynum <strong>and</strong> this cannot be confused with any other New Zeal<strong>and</strong> species.” Consequently,Araneus quaesitus is here considered a junior synonym of N. queribunda.Our exhaustive examination of Australian Araneidae did not reveal any specimens of N. queribundacollected in Australia <strong>and</strong> we do not consider this genus <strong>and</strong> species part of the Australian fauna.28 · Zootaxa 2073 © 2009 Magnolia PressFRAMENAU ET AL.


FIGURE 5. Lectotype male of Novaranea queribunda (Keyserling, 1887) comb. nov., male pedipalp, retrolateral view.Scale bar: 0.2 mm.AcknowledgementsWe are particularly indebted to Janet Beccaloni (BMNH) <strong>and</strong> Christoph Hörweg (NHMW) who facilitatedthis study either by assisting when visiting their institution or by the loan of material. David Court (Singapore)confirmed the synonymy of A. queribundus <strong>and</strong> A. quaesitus with N. laevigata based on the photographs weprovided to him. We thank Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte <strong>and</strong> Cor Vink (both Lincoln, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>) <strong>for</strong>providing photographs of an exp<strong>and</strong>ed N. queribunda pedipalp to clarify the terminology of its sclerites. Wethank Gustavo Hormiga <strong>and</strong> an anonymous reviewer <strong>for</strong> their constructive suggestions that improved thismanuscript considerably. This study was financially supported by the Australian Biological Resources Study(ABRS) (grant no. 205–24) to VWF <strong>and</strong> NS <strong>and</strong> by the Danish Agency <strong>for</strong> Science, Technology <strong>and</strong>Innovation to NS (grant no. 272-05-0431).ReferencesArcher, A.F. (1951) Studies in the <strong>orb</strong><strong>weaving</strong> spiders (Argiopidae). 1. American Museum Novitates, 1487, 1–52.Bonnet, P. (1955) Bibliographia Araneorum. Tome II (part 1: A–B). Douladoure, Toulouse, pp. 1–918.Butler, A.G. (1876) On a small collection of Arachnida from Queensl<strong>and</strong>, with descriptions of three apparently <strong>new</strong>species. Cistula Entomologica, 1, 349–354.Court, D.J. & Forster, R.R. (1988) Family Araneidae. Subfamily Araneidae [sic]. Otago Museum Bulletin, 6, 70–124.Glueck, S. (1994) A taxonomic revision of the <strong>orb</strong> weaver genus Acacesia (Araneae: Araneidae). Psyche, 101, 59–84.Karsch, F. (1878) Exotisch-araneologisches. Zeitschrift für die gesamten Naturwissenschaften, 51, 322–333, 782–826.Keyserling, E. (1987) Die Arachniden Australiens, nach der Natur beschrieben und abgebildet. (Theil 2, 3. Lieferung).Bauer & Raspe, Nürnberg, pp. 153–202.Koch, L. (1971) Die Arachniden Australiens, nach der Natur beschrieben und abgebildet. (Theil 1, 1. Lieferung). Bauer& Raspe, Nürnberg, pp. 1–104.Levi, H.W. (1988) The Neotropical <strong>orb</strong>-<strong>weaving</strong> spiders of the genus Alpaida (Araneae: Araneidae). Bulletin of theMuseum of Comparative Zoology, 151, 365–487.Levi, H.W. (2002) Keys to the genera of araneid <strong>orb</strong>weavers (Araneae, Araneidae) of the Americas. Journal ofNEW SYNONYMIES FOR ORB-WEAVING SPIDERSZootaxa 2073 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 29


Arachnology, 30, 527–562.Levi, H.W. (2007) The Genus Eustala (Araneidae). http://www.oeb.harvard.edu/faculty/levi/eustala.html (verified 2December 2008).Petrunkevitch, A. (1911) A synonymic index-catalogue of spiders of North, Central <strong>and</strong> South America with all adjacentisl<strong>and</strong>s, Greenl<strong>and</strong>, Bermuda, West Indies, Terra del Fuego, Galapagos, etc. Bulletin of the American Museum ofNatural History, 29, 1–791.Petrunkevitch, A. (1925) Arachnida from Panama. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts <strong>and</strong> Sciences, 27,51–248.Platnick N.I. (2009) The World Spider Catalog, Version 9.5. The American Museum of Natural History: New York.Available at: http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/INTRO1.html (verified 2 March 2009).Rainbow, W.J. (1911) A census of Australian Araneidae. Records of the Australian Museum, 9, 107–319.Roewer, C.F. (1942) Katalog der Araneae von 1758 bis 1940. 1. B<strong>and</strong> (Mesothelae, Orthognatha, Labidognatha:Dysderae<strong>for</strong>mia, Scytodi<strong>for</strong>mia, Pholci<strong>for</strong>mia, Zodarii<strong>for</strong>mia, Hersiliae<strong>for</strong>mia, Argyopi<strong>for</strong>mia). Paul Budy,Bremen. 1040 pp.Sharp, A. (1968) The Voyages of Abel Janszoon Tasman. Clarendon Press, London, 375 pp.Str<strong>and</strong>, E. (1908) Diagnosen neuer aussereuropäischer Argiopiden. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 33, 1–4.Str<strong>and</strong>, E. (1916) Systematische-faunistische Studien über paläarktische, afrikanische und amerikanische Spinnen desSenckenbergischen Museums. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 81 (A9), 1–153.Treffer, G. (ed.) (1973) Die Weltumseglung der Novara, 1857–1859. Molden, Vienna, 224 pp.Urquhart, A.T. (1891) Descriptions of <strong>new</strong> species of Araneae. Transactions <strong>and</strong> Proceedings of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong>Institute, 24, 230–253.Urquhart, A.T. (1892) Catalogue of the described species of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Araneidae. Transactions of the New Zeal<strong>and</strong>Institute, 24, 220–230.30 · Zootaxa 2073 © 2009 Magnolia PressFRAMENAU ET AL.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!