13.07.2015 Views

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> Multi‐<strong>Hazard</strong> <strong>Mitigation</strong> Plan<strong>Chapter</strong> 5 – Earthquakes, Floods and Wildfires: Risks and StrategiesCEA to “educate residents about their earthquake risk and motivate them to protect themselvesand their property.” The CEA board sets aside funding each calendar year (equal to 5 percent <strong>of</strong>its investment income up to $5 million annually) for funding mitigation efforts. This annualallocation requirement is set forth in <strong>California</strong> Insurance Code Section 10089.37.Single‐Family Wood‐Frame DwellingsApproximately 1.5 million single‐family dwellings were built in <strong>California</strong> before 1960 whenjurisdictions began to require adequately braced walls. Homes can slide or fall <strong>of</strong>f theirfoundations if not adequately anchored and braced.The primary risk posed by single‐family wood‐frame buildings is the potential for loss <strong>of</strong> housingand property after earthquakes. In addition, poorly braced homes on steep hillsides can slidedown hills and present significant threats to life. Falling chimneys can also cause casualties anddamage.A 1999 survey by the Association <strong>of</strong> Bay Area Governments (ABAG) determined that from 2percent to 38 percent <strong>of</strong> Bay Area homes were retr<strong>of</strong>itted depending upon jurisdiction, with anaverage retr<strong>of</strong>it rate well below 10 percent. Similarly, the <strong>California</strong> Earthquake Authority hasfound that about 6 percent <strong>of</strong> policyholders have retr<strong>of</strong>itted their homes.<strong>Mitigation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Single‐Family Wood‐Frame DwellingsThe following cities have voluntary dwelling retr<strong>of</strong>it programs:• Los Angeles‐6000 retr<strong>of</strong>itted as <strong>of</strong> February 2006 (also adopted a hillside dwelling retr<strong>of</strong>itordinance)• Berkeley• San Leandro• Oakland• Santa Barbara• Santa MonicaThe most current retr<strong>of</strong>it provisions are available in Appendix <strong>Chapter</strong> 3 <strong>of</strong> the InternationalExisting Building Code. Local governments in the San Francisco Bay Region have adopted morestringent retr<strong>of</strong>it provisions called Standard Plan Set A.(www.abag.ca.gov/bayarea/eqmaps/fixit/plansets.html)The state also requires sellers <strong>of</strong> dwelling buildings to disclose to buyers any typical earthquakeweaknesses defined in the Homeowner’s Guide to Earthquake Safety.Multi‐Unit Wood‐Frame Residential BuildingsThere is no statewide inventory <strong>of</strong> multi‐unit wood‐frame residential buildings. However, theapproximate number <strong>of</strong> buildings can be inferred from local inventories available from selectcities as summarized below. 54 A significant number (perhaps one‐third) <strong>of</strong> all apartments and54Department <strong>of</strong> Finance Demographics Unit (www.d<strong>of</strong>.ca.gov); Vukazich, Selvaduray & Tran, Santa Clara County Survey, EERISpectra Vol. 22, No 4, Nov 2006Public Comment Draft – July 2010 158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!