13.07.2015 Views

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> Multi‐<strong>Hazard</strong> <strong>Mitigation</strong> Plan<strong>Chapter</strong> 5 – Earthquakes, Floods and Wildfires: Risks and Strategiesthroughout the state to determine how many pre‐1976 non‐ductile concrete buildings they mayhave within their jurisdictions. The goal is to create an inventory so that appropriate state andlocal policy can be formulated.The most current retr<strong>of</strong>it provisions are available in ASCE 41‐06 and Appendix <strong>Chapter</strong> A5 <strong>of</strong> theInternational Existing Building Code. The following jurisdictions have retr<strong>of</strong>it programs for nonductileconcrete buildings:Table 5.J: <strong>Mitigation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Older Concrete BuildingsJurisdiction Buildings Type <strong>of</strong> ProgramLong Beach Non‐bearing URM, including non‐ductile concrete with URM Mandatory Retr<strong>of</strong>itLos Angeles 1500 to 2000 buildings Voluntary StrengtheningFremont City Hall Voluntary StrengtheningPalo Alto 49 buildings Voluntary StrengtheningPetaluma 5 buildings Partial StrengtheningSanta Monica 70 buildings Mandatory Retr<strong>of</strong>itaSource: <strong>California</strong> Seismic Safety CommissionRepair <strong>of</strong> Steel‐Frame BuildingsAfter the Northridge Earthquake, the City <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles enacted an ordinance that required therepair <strong>of</strong> existing damaged steel‐frame buildings. Many <strong>of</strong> these buildings were restored to theirpre‐earthquake conditions and are likely to suffer similar or worse damage in futureearthquakes. Elsewhere in the state no surveys <strong>of</strong> such buildings exist, although several similarlydamaged buildings were discovered in the Bay Area years after the 1989 Loma PrietaEarthquake. The state has since changed its building code for constructing new buildings withthis type <strong>of</strong> framing. There are no efforts in the state to require retr<strong>of</strong>its or enact post‐disasterrepair provisions.<strong>Mitigation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Steel‐Frame BuildingsThe cities <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles and Santa Monica have post‐earthquake repair ordinances. Los Angelesrequired owners to remove the finishes from joints in 242 buildings and repair the ones thatwere cracked. The most current recommended evaluation and retr<strong>of</strong>it provisions are in AISC 41‐06, FEMA 350 to FEMA 353 and the American Institute <strong>of</strong> Steel Construction Seismic Provisions(AISC 341). See www.aisc.org for more information. As <strong>of</strong> February 2006, the City <strong>of</strong> Los Angeleshas reported cracks repaired in welds in 500 buildings in the region <strong>of</strong> strongest NorthridgeEarthquake shaking.High‐Rise BuildingsThere is no statewide inventory <strong>of</strong> high‐rise buildings. Only approximately 0.03 percent <strong>of</strong> allbuildings in the state have eight or more stories. However, much <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong>’s corporate,finance, legal, and insurance commerce takes place in these buildings. The potential for loss <strong>of</strong>market share in the economy from the closure <strong>of</strong> these buildings after earthquakes due tononstructural damage is significant. The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat maintainsan inventory <strong>of</strong> high‐rise buildings at www.ctbuh.org.Public Comment Draft – July 2010 163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!