13.07.2015 Views

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

Chapter 1 - Hazard Mitigation Web Portal - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>California</strong> Multi‐<strong>Hazard</strong> <strong>Mitigation</strong> Plan<strong>Chapter</strong> 5 – Earthquakes, Floods and Wildfires: Risks and Strategies<strong>Mitigation</strong> in High‐Rise BuildingsGuidelines are available for the retr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> building contents and nonstructural building systems,such as ceilings, light fixtures and mechanical equipment (FEMA 74). Structural retr<strong>of</strong>its can beaccomplished using ASCE 41‐06 or the International Existing Building Code. A Tall BuildingsInitiative has been launched by the cities <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles and San Francisco to developperformance‐based engineering for future new tall buildings.(http://peer.berkeley.edu/tbi/index.html )Mobile Homes<strong>California</strong> has approximately 473,000 mobile homes. HCD regulates installations and alterationsto mobile homes in approximately 3,600 <strong>of</strong> the state’s 5,800 mobile home parks. Localgovernments have enforcement jurisdiction over the remaining parks, as well as over allmanufactured home installations outside <strong>of</strong> parks. In 1974, HCD began to require engineeredtie‐down devices for wind loads in excess <strong>of</strong> 15 pounds per square foot for singlewide homes.However, most mobile homes installed from 1974 to 1994 were multi‐wide or were installed inregions with lower wind speed and were exempt from this requirement. Therefore, mosthomes installed prior to 1994 are not attached to their foundations or otherwise braced to resistearthquake loads.Numerous studies have determined that the performance <strong>of</strong> pre‐1994 mobile homes in<strong>California</strong> earthquakes is significantly worse than that <strong>of</strong> conventional wood‐frame dwellings.The primary earthquake weaknesses are the temporary foundations on which such homes arecommonly placed. Homes on inadequate foundations can shift and fall several feet inearthquakes, severing gas lines. Doors can become stuck, trapping occupants and creatingserious threats to life in events with fires (SSC 95‐01, Turning Loss to Gain).<strong>Mitigation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mobile HomesIn 1981, the state began to regulate the design and construction <strong>of</strong> optional EarthquakeResistant Bracing Systems that can be installed under existing mobile homes at the owners’discretion. Since 1994, the state has required that new or relocated mobile homes be braced toresist earthquakes in one <strong>of</strong> three ways:• Conventional foundation systems similar to wood‐frame dwellings• Engineered tie‐down systems• Earthquake‐Resistant Bracing SystemsProgress Summary 5.K: Mobile HomesProgress as <strong>of</strong> 2010: <strong>California</strong> HCD revised its regulations in October 2009 to require that fuelgasburning water heaters in new mobile homes be seismically braced upon installation. Thisregulation extends to existing mobile homes by requiring seismic bracing to be demonstratedupon re‐sale or rental. The current high priority for HCD for future mobile home mitigation is topursue a requirement for installation <strong>of</strong> fire sprinkler systems in new manufactured homes. Thisis expected in January <strong>of</strong> 2011.<strong>Mitigation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Natural Gas Systems in BuildingsThe CSSC has developed guidance for local governments for mitigating natural gas systems inbuildings, titled Improving Natural Gas Safety in Earthquakes (SSC 02‐03). The most cost‐Public Comment Draft – July 2010 164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!