13.07.2015 Views

accession program for agriculture and rural development in ... - MADR

accession program for agriculture and rural development in ... - MADR

accession program for agriculture and rural development in ... - MADR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3.2.4 The Quantification of Goals – Outputs, Results <strong>and</strong> ImpactThe mid-term evaluation update should consider the quantification of theoperational objectives <strong>for</strong> the <strong>program</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> each measure, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>toaccount that the achievement of the operational objectives contributes tothe achievement of the specific <strong>and</strong> general objectives of the Program.The mid-term evaluation update should exam<strong>in</strong>e the quantificationeffectiveness of measures operational objectives.The mid-term evaluation update should <strong>in</strong>clude an analysis of the logicalconnections between the quantified operational objectives of the measures<strong>and</strong> the general <strong>and</strong> specific objectives of the Program <strong>in</strong> view of ensur<strong>in</strong>gthe economic <strong>and</strong> social cohesion.Also, the mid-term evaluation update should analyse the implementation<strong>in</strong>dicators, the result <strong>and</strong> impact of each measure <strong>and</strong> sub-measure <strong>and</strong>should propose their improvement <strong>and</strong> adaptation to the present nationalcontext.The common evaluation questions with associated criteria <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators,as proposed <strong>in</strong> the Commission evaluation guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>for</strong> SAPARD <strong>and</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Annex 1 of these Terms of Reference, must be adapted to thecontext of this evaluation update. It has to be established whether allquestions, criteria <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicators are relevant <strong>and</strong> how will they be applied<strong>in</strong> each case. If this is not the case, a justification of their non-applicabilityshould be given.The <strong>in</strong>dicators must reflect the <strong>in</strong>ter-dependence between the outcomes ofthe proper implementation of the Program measures. Also, the mid-termevaluation update must identify every <strong>in</strong>dicator which is strongly <strong>in</strong>fluencedby external factors <strong>and</strong> propose improvement or replacement solutions.To that effect, the mid-term evaluation update should comprise:‣ Analysis of output, results <strong>and</strong> impact <strong>in</strong>dicators which quantify theobjectives <strong>and</strong> the major identified imbalances;‣ Verification of output, results <strong>and</strong> impact <strong>in</strong>dicators correlation withgeneral, specific <strong>and</strong> operational objectives;‣ Evaluation of output, results <strong>and</strong> impact <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong> the context ofmonitor<strong>in</strong>g of equal opportunities <strong>for</strong> men <strong>and</strong> women, environmentprotection <strong>and</strong> other horizontal issues;TERMS OF REFERENCE - Updat<strong>in</strong>g of Mid-Term Evaluation of the SAPARD Program 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!