Laboratory evaluation of six formulations of spinosad in an effort to ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 1. Bucket cage used in evaluating baits for rangeland grasshoppers. Figure 2. Setup for evaluating selected grasshopper baits in one of two separate cage studies near Edgemont, South Dakota, 2008. 8
Figure 3. Fifth instar Cordillacris occipitalis (Photo by Robert Pfadt 2002) Figure 4. Selecting the appropriate grasshopper species from sweep net collections for placement in cages. 9
Page 1 and 2: Laboratory evaluation of six modifi
Page 3 and 4: Spinosad works by contact and inges
Page 5 and 6: Approximately two weeks into the st
Page 7 and 8: Figure 2. Treated grass pots placed
Page 9 and 10: Mean % mortality 100 80 60 40 20 0
Page 17 and 18: treatment of rangeland with diflube
Page 19 and 20: Conclusions Effective levels of con
Page 21 and 22: Figure 2. Fourth instar Ageneotetti
Page 24 and 25: August, 2008 Replacing traditional
Page 26 and 27: Materials and Methods StudySite The
Page 28 and 29: An analysis of variance was perform
Page 30 and 31: References Connin, R. V. and L. C.
Page 32 and 33: Table 2. Meteorological conditions
Page 34 and 35: Table 4. Mean percentage mortality
Page 36 and 37: Figure 3. One of forty 0.1 m 2 ring
Page 38 and 39: Introduction Various baits (carrier
Page 40 and 41: treatments, grasshoppers in all cag
Page 42 and 43: Conover, W.J. and R.L. Iman. 1981.
Page 46 and 47: Figure 5. Monitoring bucket cages u

Laboratory evaluation of six formulations of spinosad in an effort to ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?