Peer Review Impact Analysis Report - Peer Review in European VET

Peer Review Impact Analysis Report 123. 2 The sampleIn the selection of the sample the above criteria were very well observed.The sample provides a good cross-section of all three pilot phases: Only one country was not representedin the sample (Spain/Catalonia), countries in which more than three Peer Reviews had takenplace were represented with two case studies.Table 3:Countries representedCountry Peer Reviews Case Studies %AT 6 2 33%DE 1 1 100%DK 3 (1)* 1 33% (100%)ES 1 - 0%FI 3 2 67%HU 1 1 100%IT 4 2 50%NL 2 2 100%PT 2 1 50%RO 1 1 100%UK 1 1 100%Total 25(23)* 14 56% (61%)*Actually only 1 Danish Peer Review was transnational, so in terms of a transnational European Peer Review,only 1 Danish Peer Review counts, reducing the total number to 23.Source: Peer Review Impact DatabaseThe sample also included a good cross-section of all three pilot phases.Table 4:Representation of pilot phasesPhase Peer Reviews Case Studies %2006 15 9 60%2007 4 2 50%2008-2009 6 (4)* 3 50% (75%)Total 25 (23)* 14 56% (61%)*See comment above.Source: Peer Review Impact DatabaseGutknecht-Gmeiner 2010Peer Review Impact2009-1-FI1-LEO05-01584