Threats and StressesIf amphibians are using the ponds for breeding grounds, they may use the surrounding habitat up to adistance of 159-290 meters (Semlitsch and Bodie 2003). Amphibians are sensitive to the physicalstructure and microclimatic conditions (i.e., temperature, moisture level) on the forest floor. Forestcanopy removal within this area may negatively impact the quality of the habitat for amphibians byincreasing temperatures and decreasing humidity on the forest floor. Compaction, removal ordisruption of herbaceous growth and organic debris, or other direct disturbances to the structure of theforest floor may also degrade the habitat for amphibians.RecommendationsFurther surveys to document amphibian and insect species utilizing the ponds are recommended, toprovide a baseline to guide future management decisions. These groups are likely to form asignificant component of biodiversity in this habitat. Based on the area range which amphibians mayoccupy surrounding the wetland, it is recommended that a full forest canopy be maintained anddisturbances to the forest floor avoided within 250 m of the pond edges in order to preventdegradation of amphibian habitat.Gifford Run Wetlands BDADescriptionCore Habitat Area—The focus of this biological diversity area is the large wetland complex in theheadwaters of Gifford Run. Six small drainages converge in these headwaters, and the broadly slopedlandscape has provided opportunity for the development of extensive wetlands along much of thestream network in the area. The vegetative community types found in the wetland cannot becharacterized according to the Community Classification, and thus their relative uniqueness in thestate or region cannot be fully evaluated at this time. The site as a whole is unique because of itslarge size.The wetlands are probably fed mainly by precipitation and surface runoff; although a few seepageareas were observed, their outflow appeared to be fairly low. The physical structure of the wetlandand the vegetative species composition suggest beaver activity may have figured prominently in thedevelopment of parts of this wetland complex. The complex contains several large, flat patches ofhomogeneous vegetation, a structure which typically results in the aftermath of beaver impoundment.The northernmost tributary confluence area is broad and flat, with very uniform vegetation dominatedby northern long sedge (Carex folliculata), prickly bog sedge or star sedge (Carex atlantica or C.echinata) and swamp dewberry (Rubus hispidus), with small shrubs (Aronia sp., Ilex verticillata)scattered occasionally. Further south the wetland area narrows, but becomes broad again whereanother small hollow joins Gifford Run; these areas are also fairly flat and dominated by densespeckled alder (Alnus rugosa), except at the edges where a more diverse collection of species occursin the elevational transition zone. Further east of this central wetland area along Gifford Run isanother broad wetland area, with more elevational complexity. Low, perennially hydric areas aredominated by mosses (principally Sphagnum spp. and Polytrichum sp.), rushes (Juncusbrevicaudatus), tawny cottongrass (Eriophorum virginicum) or rattlesnake mannagrass (Glyceriacanadensis). Higher areas are dominated by shrubs (mainly Spiraea tomentosa, but also Alnusincana, Viburnum recognitum, and Aronia sp.), or graminoid species (Carex intumescens, Carexechinata or C. atlantica). The uppermost zone between the wetland and the surrounding forest ischaracterized by dense lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium).81
The Supporting <strong>Natural</strong> Landscape is the watershed above the wetlands. This area helps to maintainthe water quality of the wetlands, and its forested condition enhances the long-term viability of thewetland communities. Between the wetland areas, the floodplain is higher and narrower, with smallpatches of shrub or herbaceous wetland and semi-palustrine forest, while upland areas surroundingthe wetland are mainly terrestrial forest.Threats and StressesCore Habitat Area—There is a large cabin and parking area very near the southern edge of theeastern-most wetland area. A broad range of substances harmful to wildlife and ecosystem healthcould potentially be introduced into the wetland by human activity here, including pest controlchemicals, detergents, automotive fluids, septic materials, and exotic species.Supporting <strong>Natural</strong> Landscape—Any herbicides, pesticides, or other chemicals released in this areawill drain into the wetland, where they may be toxic to its inhabitants. If forest cover is removed, soilerosion could result in sediment pollution in the wetlands, which degrades the habitat for many plantand animal species. Greatly decreased forest cover in this area may also diminish the long-termviability of the wetland community.RecommendationsCore Habitat Area—Users of the cabin should avoid bringing any toxic materials into the area; agood rule of thumb is to avoid substances not safe for human consumption. Septic systems should becarefully designed and/or upgraded to minimize discharge of nitrogen, solids, or contaminants, andregularly monitored to detect any maintenance needs.Supporting <strong>Natural</strong> Landscape— To maintain good water quality for the wetlands, forest coverremoval should be avoided on steeply sloped areas, appropriate erosion control BMPs should beapplied if forest cover is disturbed in other areas, and toxic materials should not be released.Preservation of forest cover in this area, especially in such a pattern as to connect the wetland withsurrounding forested areas, is likely to enhance prospects for the long-term health of this habitat.Mosquito Creek Tributary-County Line Wetland BDADescriptionThis BDA is designated around an extensive wetland complex in the headwaters of a tributary toMosquito Run.Core Habitat Area—Throughout the area, there are old beaver dams in various stages of succession,from ponds, to meadows, to re-growing shrub thickets. The plant species composition does not fitany of the community types described in the <strong>Pennsylvania</strong> Terrestrial and Palustrine CommunityClassification (Fike 1999), and thus cannot be easily compared to other wetlands to determine itsuniqueness in the state. The plant species composition is similar to other wetlands observed in thehigh plateau region of the county, suggesting it is unlikely to be of state significance. It is locallysignificant as a wetland habitat.Old stumps scattered throughout the wetland, suggesting it once had a canopy of large white pine orhemlock. Today, almost no tree regrowth has occurred. There are widely scattered individuals of redmaple (Acer rubrum), white oak (Quercus alba), yellow birch (Betula allegheniensis), and smoothshadbush (Amelanchier laevis). The lowest areas of the wetland are saturated, with sphagnum mosscover. Herbaceous species include: swamp dewberry (Rubus hispidus), prickly bog sedge (Carex82
- Page 2 and 3:
CLEARFIELD COUNTYNATURAL HERITAGE I
- Page 4 and 5:
Over the history of these studies,
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface………
- Page 8 and 9:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYIntroductionA heal
- Page 10 and 11:
Ground SurveyAreas identified as po
- Page 12 and 13:
Table 1. Natural Heritage Areas cat
- Page 14 and 15:
outcrops occur in conjunction with
- Page 16 and 17:
INTRODUCTIONA healthy natural lands
- Page 18 and 19:
Natural Resilience, Human Activitie
- Page 20 and 21:
Natural Heritage Inventory MappingG
- Page 23:
Natural History Overview of Clearfi
- Page 26 and 27:
SoilsSoil character exerts a strong
- Page 28 and 29:
preventing the establishment of see
- Page 30 and 31:
METHODSThe methods used in the Clea
- Page 32 and 33:
fragmenting feature data to generat
- Page 34:
*Defined as: 2,000 waterfowl (at on
- Page 38 and 39:
RESULTSContiguous Forest Blocks in
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 5. ContinuedSize% Roadless Ac
- Page 44 and 45:
Landscape Conservation AreasThe Lan
- Page 46 and 47:
SGL #120 LCAThis LCA is a contiguou
- Page 48 and 49:
Moravian Run - Alder Run LCAThis LC
- Page 50 and 51:
Threats and StressesIn some portion
- Page 52 and 53:
Gifford Run Valley, west slope37
- Page 54:
Beccaria Township, Coalport Borough
- Page 57:
Bell Township, Mahaffey Borough, &
- Page 60 and 61:
Featherbells(Stenanthium gramineum)
- Page 62 and 63: Supporting Natural Landscape—To m
- Page 64: Bigler TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 67: Bloom TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Statu
- Page 70: What It Looks Like:Appalachian Game
- Page 74 and 75: BOGGS TOWNSHIPThe landscape of the
- Page 77 and 78: BRADFORD TOWNSHIPThe landscape of B
- Page 80 and 81: BRADY TOWNSHIPBrady Township falls
- Page 83 and 84: BURNSIDE TOWNSHIPThe West Branch Su
- Page 85 and 86: BURNSIDE BOROUGHThe landscape of Bu
- Page 88 and 89: CHEST TOWNSHIPChest Township is 71%
- Page 90 and 91: Heron Rookery at Chest Creek Floodp
- Page 93 and 94: COOPER TOWNSHIPCooper Township lies
- Page 96 and 97: COVINGTON TOWNSHIPThe northern half
- Page 98 and 99: Creeping Snowberry(Gaultheria hispi
- Page 100 and 101: should be avoided within the core a
- Page 103 and 104: DECATUR TOWNSHIPMost of Decatur Tow
- Page 106 and 107: FERGUSON TOWNSHIPThe southwestern p
- Page 111: GIRARD TOWNSHIPThe northern two-thi
- Page 115 and 116: RecommendationsCore Habitat Area—
- Page 120 and 121: GOSHEN TOWNSHIPMost of Goshen Towns
- Page 122 and 123: Gifford Run Wetlands (pg. 81)Steepl
- Page 125 and 126: GRAHAM TOWNSHIPThe landscape of Gra
- Page 128 and 129: GREENWOOD TOWNSHIPGreenwood Townshi
- Page 131: Gulich Township & Ramey BoroughPNDI
- Page 134 and 135: herbaceous layer is somewhat sparse
- Page 136: Huston TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 139 and 140: Supporting Natural Landscape— Any
- Page 141 and 142: Along the stream channel connecting
- Page 143 and 144: Supporting Natural Landscape—Use
- Page 145: Jordan TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 148: Karthaus TownshipPNDI Rank Legal St
- Page 151: Knox TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Status
- Page 154: Lawrence Township & Clearfield Boro
- Page 158 and 159: documented in Pennsylvania. It hibe
- Page 160 and 161: allegheniensis) dominant in the can
- Page 162:
Morris TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 165:
Penn Township, Grampian Borough,& L
- Page 168:
Pike Township & Curwensville Boroug
- Page 171:
Pine TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Status
- Page 174 and 175:
pine species (Lycopodium dendroideu
- Page 176 and 177:
Threats and StressesFoot traffic on
- Page 178 and 179:
wetlands to determine its uniquenes
- Page 180:
Sandy Township, Dubois City, & Fall
- Page 183 and 184:
eeding season, and they will be sen
- Page 185:
Union TownshipPNDI RankGlobal State
- Page 188:
Woodward Township, Brisbin Borough,
- Page 191 and 192:
RECOMMENDATIONSThe following are ge
- Page 193 and 194:
situations, the site is effectively
- Page 195 and 196:
GLOSSARYAlluvium: detrital deposits
- Page 197 and 198:
LITERATURE CITEDAnonymous. 1985. A
- Page 199 and 200:
Naeem., S. (Chair), F.S. Chapin III
- Page 201 and 202:
GIS DATA SOURCESBedrock geologic un
- Page 203 and 204:
APPENDIX IIPENNSYLVANIA NATURAL HER
- Page 205 and 206:
Evidence of Disturbance (logging, g
- Page 207 and 208:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 209 and 210:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 211 and 212:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 213 and 214:
APPENDIX V bPENNSYLVANIA STATUSNati
- Page 215 and 216:
small numbers throughout their rang
- Page 217 and 218:
State Element RanksS1 = Critically
- Page 219 and 220:
Photo: Lisa SmithHairy rock-cress (
- Page 221:
The Sustainable Forestry Initiative