SoilsSoil character exerts a strong influence on vegetation, as all plant species have individual requirements for nutrientavailability, moisture levels, and pH level. A soil association is a natural grouping of soils based on similarities inclimatic or physiographic factors and soil parent materials. It may include a number of soil types provided they areall present in significant proportions (Canadian Soil Information System, 2003). The soils of Clearfield Countyhave been described in Soil Survey of Clearfield County, <strong>Pennsylvania</strong> (USDA, 1988). Table 3 (pg. 10)summarizes information from the Soil Survey about soil associations found in Clearfield County.VegetationForest CommunitiesClearfield County is a predominantly forested landscape. As is true of most forests in <strong>Pennsylvania</strong>, the forestsof Clearfield County are almost all second- or third- growth stands; there are few known areas of old-growthforest in the county. The three ecoregions which the county is at the juncture of each have characteristic forestcommunity types, and the forests of Clearfield County appear to reflect its position at the transition zonebetween ecoregions. However, the current composition of the forests has been influenced not only by the rangeof variation in natural characteristics such as soil, geology, and climate, but also by the relatively extremeconditions experienced during recent history, including clearcutting and widespread fires near the turn of thecentury, decades of severe deer overbrowsing, and the acidification of soils from decades of industriallyacidified precipitation.The Central Appalachian Mountains originally contained mixed mesophytic forest in mesic conditions, and oakforests in drier sites. The mixed mesophytic forest is characterized by a diverse canopy with shared dominanceamong several species, and an extremely diverse herbaceous layer (Braun 1950). As Clearfield County is at theextreme northern edge of the Central Appalachian Mountains, mesic forests are limited to lower slopes atrelatively low elevations. Many of the more southerly distributed species that characterize the mixedmesophytic forests are absent, and the overall diversity is not as high as is typical far south. The mesic forestsof Clearfield County are mesophytic-influenced rather than true mixed mesophytic forests. Braun (1950)characterized the region along Allegheny Front and just west of the front as a transition zone, with mesicforests along valleys and coves originally composed of sugar maple (Acer saccharum), beech (Fagusgrandifolia), tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera), red oak (Quercus rubra), basswood (Tilia americana), redmaple (Acer rubrum), red elm (Ulmus rubra), ash (Fraxinus sp.), black cherry (Prunus serotina), shagbarkhickory (Carya ovata), black birch (Betula lenta), chestnut (Castanea dentata), chestnut oak (Quercusmontana), walnut (Juglans nigra), occasional white pine, (Pinus strobus) and hemlock (Tsuga canadensis).On upper slopes, drier sites, and higher elevations, the forest communities are dominated by oaks – primarilychestnut oak (Quercus montana), but also red oak (Quercus rubra) and black oak (Quercus velutina).American chestnut (Castanea dentata) was once an important component of this forest, until the species wasdecimated by the chestnut blight in the early 20 th century. Today, red maple and black birch are common,while white oak (Quercus alba), sassafras (Sassafras albidum), and black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) are occasional.There is often a shrub layer of mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) and blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium, V.pallidum), and a heath-dominated understory.The High Allegheny Plateau is characterized by northern hardwood and hemlock/white pine – northernhardwood forests. Few records exist describing the character of forests in this region previous to Europeansettlement, and thus it is difficult to assess how the current composition of the forests compares to its historiccondition. However, studies of land survey records in Allegheny National Forest, and of old growth areas inEast Tionesta Creek suggest that the High Allegheny Plateau forests were once dominated by hemlock andbeech, with white pine stands interspersed. Today those species are much less prevalent, while red maple,black cherry, and sugar maple have greatly increased (Whitney 1990, Braun 1950). The herbaceous layer istypified by a few ubiquitous species such as intermediate wood fern (Dryopteris intermedia), wild sarsaparilla11
(Aralia nudicaulis), Canada mayflower (Maianthemum canadense), and partridgeberry (Mitchella repens).Mesic ravines and valleys typically have a stronger component of yellow birch and hemlock. In the northernplateau portion of Clearfield County, these communities are typical, while oak-heath communities similar tothose described for the Central Appalachian Mountains are found at higher elevations and on dry slopes.The original Western Allegheny Plateau forests appear to have been dominated by white oak (Quercus alba),with shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), red maple (Acer rubrum), shingle oak (Quercus imbricaria), scarlet oak(Quercus coccinea), chestnut oak (Quercus montana), black oak (Quercus velutina), red oak (Quercus rubra),American chestnut (Castanea dentata), and black cherry (Prunus serotina) present in various mixtures.In Clearfield County the less-disturbed forests tend to resemble the type characteristic of the ecoregion they fallwithin, but also display features of adjacent ecoregional types, especially following along the lines oftopographic transitions. For example, the forests of the southern part of the county tend to contain a morediverse mixture of canopy trees, including species such as tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), green ash(Fraxinus pensylvanica), swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor), and cucumber magnolia (Magnolia acuminata),which have a more southerly distribution—and these species can also be found following the valleys thatextend north of the West Branch into the High Allegheny Plateau. Conversely, forests with more northernspecies such as yellow birch (Betula allegheniensis) and wild sarsaparilla (Aralia nudicaulis) are found athigher elevations in the lower half of the county as well. In the southeast corner of the county, shingle oak(Quercus imbricaria), typical of Western Allegheny Plateau forests, is an important component of relativelyundisturbed forests and reaches the northeast edge of its range.Wetland CommunitiesWetlands provide essential habitat for many plant and animal species, as well as valuable ecosystem servicessuch as water filtration and flood control. The ecological character of a wetland is influenced by local soil type,disturbance history, bedrock composition, and hydrological regime. Types of wetlands range from forestedseeps where groundwater saturates the surface only when heavy precipitation raises the water table, to openmarshes that are continuously flooded, to low areas along streambanks that are flooded during high waterevents, to beaver meadows where the water level fluctuates over relatively long periods of time. Some types ofwetland, such as those that are created by beaver dams, develop very quickly, and major changes can beobserved in their character over mere decades. However, other types of wetland, such as sphagnum bogs, formextremely slowly, their present-day condition resulting from slow ecological processes operating over manythousands of years.In the landscape of Clearfield County, wetlands occur naturally at the headwaters of streams, in the floodplainsof streams and rivers, in areas where groundwater intercepts the surface of the ground (seepages and springs),and in beaver-impounded areas. Each of these settings provides different habitat values for native biodiversity.Wetlands resulting from excavations and impoundments are also present in the landscape; although they mayprovide habitat for typical wetland species, they were not included in this study because artificially createdwetlands typically do not host as rich or distinctive an assemblage of native species as do natural wetlands.Headwaters wetlandsThese wetlands occur in broad depressions high in a watershed where precipitation accumulates beforecoalescing into a stream channel. They may also be fed by groundwater seepage. The underlying surfacegeology is predominantly sandstone, providing little mineral enrichment, and the wetlands appear to rangein pH from somewhat acidic to highly acidic. Vegetation is usually patchy with vegetation structureresponding to slight variations in elevation. Shrubs tend to occupy higher zones, graminoids (grass-likeplants) occupy semi-saturated areas, while sphagnum and other emergent species occupy low, hydric areas.The historic condition of these wetland areas is somewhat uncertain, as there are no known descriptionsfrom before the original forests were logged in the late 1800s. Many of the wetlands contain large whitepine or hemlock stumps, indicating they were once forested; however, very little tree regeneration can beobserved in the wetlands today. Removal of the forest canopy may have elevated the water table, thus12
- Page 2 and 3: CLEARFIELD COUNTYNATURAL HERITAGE I
- Page 4 and 5: Over the history of these studies,
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface………
- Page 8 and 9: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYIntroductionA heal
- Page 10 and 11: Ground SurveyAreas identified as po
- Page 12 and 13: Table 1. Natural Heritage Areas cat
- Page 14 and 15: outcrops occur in conjunction with
- Page 16 and 17: INTRODUCTIONA healthy natural lands
- Page 18 and 19: Natural Resilience, Human Activitie
- Page 20 and 21: Natural Heritage Inventory MappingG
- Page 23: Natural History Overview of Clearfi
- Page 28 and 29: preventing the establishment of see
- Page 30 and 31: METHODSThe methods used in the Clea
- Page 32 and 33: fragmenting feature data to generat
- Page 34: *Defined as: 2,000 waterfowl (at on
- Page 38 and 39: RESULTSContiguous Forest Blocks in
- Page 40 and 41: Table 5. ContinuedSize% Roadless Ac
- Page 44 and 45: Landscape Conservation AreasThe Lan
- Page 46 and 47: SGL #120 LCAThis LCA is a contiguou
- Page 48 and 49: Moravian Run - Alder Run LCAThis LC
- Page 50 and 51: Threats and StressesIn some portion
- Page 52 and 53: Gifford Run Valley, west slope37
- Page 54: Beccaria Township, Coalport Borough
- Page 57: Bell Township, Mahaffey Borough, &
- Page 60 and 61: Featherbells(Stenanthium gramineum)
- Page 62 and 63: Supporting Natural Landscape—To m
- Page 64: Bigler TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 67: Bloom TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Statu
- Page 70: What It Looks Like:Appalachian Game
- Page 74 and 75: BOGGS TOWNSHIPThe landscape of the
- Page 77 and 78:
BRADFORD TOWNSHIPThe landscape of B
- Page 80 and 81:
BRADY TOWNSHIPBrady Township falls
- Page 83 and 84:
BURNSIDE TOWNSHIPThe West Branch Su
- Page 85 and 86:
BURNSIDE BOROUGHThe landscape of Bu
- Page 88 and 89:
CHEST TOWNSHIPChest Township is 71%
- Page 90 and 91:
Heron Rookery at Chest Creek Floodp
- Page 93 and 94:
COOPER TOWNSHIPCooper Township lies
- Page 96 and 97:
COVINGTON TOWNSHIPThe northern half
- Page 98 and 99:
Creeping Snowberry(Gaultheria hispi
- Page 100 and 101:
should be avoided within the core a
- Page 103 and 104:
DECATUR TOWNSHIPMost of Decatur Tow
- Page 106 and 107:
FERGUSON TOWNSHIPThe southwestern p
- Page 111 and 112:
GIRARD TOWNSHIPThe northern two-thi
- Page 113 and 114:
The Supporting Natural Landscape is
- Page 115 and 116:
RecommendationsCore Habitat Area—
- Page 120 and 121:
GOSHEN TOWNSHIPMost of Goshen Towns
- Page 122 and 123:
Gifford Run Wetlands (pg. 81)Steepl
- Page 125 and 126:
GRAHAM TOWNSHIPThe landscape of Gra
- Page 128 and 129:
GREENWOOD TOWNSHIPGreenwood Townshi
- Page 131:
Gulich Township & Ramey BoroughPNDI
- Page 134 and 135:
herbaceous layer is somewhat sparse
- Page 136:
Huston TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 139 and 140:
Supporting Natural Landscape— Any
- Page 141 and 142:
Along the stream channel connecting
- Page 143 and 144:
Supporting Natural Landscape—Use
- Page 145:
Jordan TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 148:
Karthaus TownshipPNDI Rank Legal St
- Page 151:
Knox TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Status
- Page 154:
Lawrence Township & Clearfield Boro
- Page 158 and 159:
documented in Pennsylvania. It hibe
- Page 160 and 161:
allegheniensis) dominant in the can
- Page 162:
Morris TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 165:
Penn Township, Grampian Borough,& L
- Page 168:
Pike Township & Curwensville Boroug
- Page 171:
Pine TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Status
- Page 174 and 175:
pine species (Lycopodium dendroideu
- Page 176 and 177:
Threats and StressesFoot traffic on
- Page 178 and 179:
wetlands to determine its uniquenes
- Page 180:
Sandy Township, Dubois City, & Fall
- Page 183 and 184:
eeding season, and they will be sen
- Page 185:
Union TownshipPNDI RankGlobal State
- Page 188:
Woodward Township, Brisbin Borough,
- Page 191 and 192:
RECOMMENDATIONSThe following are ge
- Page 193 and 194:
situations, the site is effectively
- Page 195 and 196:
GLOSSARYAlluvium: detrital deposits
- Page 197 and 198:
LITERATURE CITEDAnonymous. 1985. A
- Page 199 and 200:
Naeem., S. (Chair), F.S. Chapin III
- Page 201 and 202:
GIS DATA SOURCESBedrock geologic un
- Page 203 and 204:
APPENDIX IIPENNSYLVANIA NATURAL HER
- Page 205 and 206:
Evidence of Disturbance (logging, g
- Page 207 and 208:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 209 and 210:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 211 and 212:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 213 and 214:
APPENDIX V bPENNSYLVANIA STATUSNati
- Page 215 and 216:
small numbers throughout their rang
- Page 217 and 218:
State Element RanksS1 = Critically
- Page 219 and 220:
Photo: Lisa SmithHairy rock-cress (
- Page 221:
The Sustainable Forestry Initiative