Landscape Conservation AreasThe Landscape Conservation Areas identified in this report are blocks of forest where contiguous core habitat isno less than 100 m wide at any point, that were at least 9,000 acres in size. (see methods, pg. 16). The uniqueecological value of these forest ecosystems, arising from their size and contiguity, is that they have the capacity tobe resilient to natural disturbances and to host a full range of native forest ecosystem biodiversity, including themost sensitive forest species that require interior forest conditions or large territories.Conservation at the Landscape ScaleLCAs are large areas with ownership typically divided among many entities, individual, corporate, and public(Table 6, pg. 30). Because their unique value arises from large-scale contiguity of natural ecosystems, thegreatest threat to their future viability is fragmentation of natural cover by interruptions in the forestlandscape. Conservation of these areas’ unique habitat value and their ability to continue providingecosystem services will require coordinated efforts by the many landowners involved to preserve ecosystemhealth at the local scale and forest cover contiguity at the regional scale.Features that fragment habitat for different species range from dirt trails to roads, gas wells, cleared areas, andland conversion for residential, urban, or industrial use. Species have different thresholds for what degree ofdisturbance will be a barrier to movement or make adjacent forest habitat unusable to them. However, as thecollection of fragmenting features of all types grows, the amount of area influenced by edge effects grows andthe ability of the ecosystem to support its most sensitive species declines. Fragmentation can be minimizedby utilizing existing disturbances for new projects rather than clearing additional forest, by consolidatingroads and right-of-ways where multiple routes exist, and by restoring unused cleared areas such as abandonedroads, wells, or mined areas to forest. When planning the path of a fragmenting land use change, impact canbe minimized by avoiding complete division of the LCA; any feature which cuts completely across thecontiguous forested area will effectively create two separate, smaller communities, while preservation of alinkage at least several hundred meters wide preserves overall contiguity of the forest block. The impact ofindividual features such as wells, roads, right-of-ways, or other clearings can also be minimized by the use ofecologically informed best management practices in construction and maintenance. (see Arkansas ForestryCommission reference pg. 147 for road management, Appendix VII on pg. 170 for further informationsources)In addition to forest contiguity, it is also important to steward forest ecosystem health— by managing fornative diversity in plant, animal, and other species, and conserving ecologically important aspects of thephysical landscape such as soil structure, naturally decomposing dead wood, and structural diversity in forestcomposition. Timber harvesting can be compatible with the ecological viability of the region if it is pursuedaccording to a plan designed for the long-term sustainability of both the timber resource and the forestecosystem, with the use of ecologically informed best management practices. Surface mining in previouslyunmined areas is not compatible with the ecological assets of the area. Mined areas create a permanent lossof habitat, as it is extremely difficult if not impossible to restore a forest ecosystem with healthy function andbiodiversity in the environmental conditions that result after mining. Mining also causes water qualitydegradation that is difficult to remediate. A number of resources, listed in Appendix VII (pg 170), areavailable to private landowners interested in sustainably managing their forestlands for biodiversityconservation, forest health, and forest products including timber, mushrooms, and high-value medicinal herbs.A good place to start is the PA Bureau of Forestry’s Forest Stewardship <strong>Program</strong>, which assists landowners indeveloping a forest management plan based on their envisioned goals for their land.29
Table 6. Ownership of lands within forested Landscape Conservation Areas.Landscape Conservation AreaTotal AreaPrivateOwnershipArea inClearfieldCountyMoshannon State Forest 253,453 acres 28% 134,300 acresSW Elk State Forest 33,219 acres 69% 3,986 acresCentral Allegheny Front 32,935 acres 77% 1,317 acresSGL #77 25,622 acres 77% 15,166 acresS. Central Allegheny Front 25,171 acres 35% 1,006 acresAnderson Creek – Montgomery Creek 22,687 acres 63% AllBennett Branch Headwaters 17,281 acres 49% AllHaslett Run 16,641 acres 93% AllSGL #120 13,044 acres 73% 9,391 acresMontgomery Run LCA 9,995 acres 48% AllMoravian Run – Alder Run 9,082 acres 99% AllClearfield County LCAsHaslett Run LCAHaslett Run LCA is a contiguous forest block 16,643 acres in size. Its size gives it the potential to hostviable populations of neotropical migrant bird species (~9,000 acres needed), as well as the area-sensitiveinterior forest species the Northern Goshawk (~10,500 acres needed) and the Barred Owl (~17,000 acres).This LCA spans the eastern continental divide between the Ohio and Susquehanna river basins. Thedivide is the highest elevation in the LCA, ~1800 feet. South of the divide, the terrain slopes downwardsinto the valley cut by the West Branch Susquehanna River. Several streams cut steeply through the slopedown to meet the river: Laurel Run, Haslett Run, Curry Run, and Poplar Run. North of the divide, theLCA contains Beech Run and other small tributaries to the East Branch Mahoning Creek. Forest maturityis variable, with some areas in mature and diverse northern hardwood forest and other areas in very youngregrowth.Threats and StressesThis LCA has a high density of fragmenting features— gas wells, access roads, and strip mines—dissecting its edges and embedded within it. The percentage of roadless core habitat is very low for thisLCA, only 18%. This fragmentation increases the area impacted by edge effects, threatening the uniquevalue of the LCA as habitat for interior-forest specialists. Strip mining and gas well development insurrounding areas have also resulted in water quality problems in several of the streams in this LCA.RecommendationsAs fragmentation is an especial problem in this LCA, it is highly recommended that further fragmentationbe avoided and a more contiguous pattern of forest pursued through targeted restoration efforts. Pollutionof waterways by mining discharges and gas extraction activities should also be addressed.30
- Page 2 and 3: CLEARFIELD COUNTYNATURAL HERITAGE I
- Page 4 and 5: Over the history of these studies,
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTSPreface………
- Page 8 and 9: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYIntroductionA heal
- Page 10 and 11: Ground SurveyAreas identified as po
- Page 12 and 13: Table 1. Natural Heritage Areas cat
- Page 14 and 15: outcrops occur in conjunction with
- Page 16 and 17: INTRODUCTIONA healthy natural lands
- Page 18 and 19: Natural Resilience, Human Activitie
- Page 20 and 21: Natural Heritage Inventory MappingG
- Page 23: Natural History Overview of Clearfi
- Page 26 and 27: SoilsSoil character exerts a strong
- Page 28 and 29: preventing the establishment of see
- Page 30 and 31: METHODSThe methods used in the Clea
- Page 32 and 33: fragmenting feature data to generat
- Page 34: *Defined as: 2,000 waterfowl (at on
- Page 38 and 39: RESULTSContiguous Forest Blocks in
- Page 40 and 41: Table 5. ContinuedSize% Roadless Ac
- Page 46 and 47: SGL #120 LCAThis LCA is a contiguou
- Page 48 and 49: Moravian Run - Alder Run LCAThis LC
- Page 50 and 51: Threats and StressesIn some portion
- Page 52 and 53: Gifford Run Valley, west slope37
- Page 54: Beccaria Township, Coalport Borough
- Page 57: Bell Township, Mahaffey Borough, &
- Page 60 and 61: Featherbells(Stenanthium gramineum)
- Page 62 and 63: Supporting Natural Landscape—To m
- Page 64: Bigler TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 67: Bloom TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Statu
- Page 70: What It Looks Like:Appalachian Game
- Page 74 and 75: BOGGS TOWNSHIPThe landscape of the
- Page 77 and 78: BRADFORD TOWNSHIPThe landscape of B
- Page 80 and 81: BRADY TOWNSHIPBrady Township falls
- Page 83 and 84: BURNSIDE TOWNSHIPThe West Branch Su
- Page 85 and 86: BURNSIDE BOROUGHThe landscape of Bu
- Page 88 and 89: CHEST TOWNSHIPChest Township is 71%
- Page 90 and 91: Heron Rookery at Chest Creek Floodp
- Page 93 and 94:
COOPER TOWNSHIPCooper Township lies
- Page 96 and 97:
COVINGTON TOWNSHIPThe northern half
- Page 98 and 99:
Creeping Snowberry(Gaultheria hispi
- Page 100 and 101:
should be avoided within the core a
- Page 103 and 104:
DECATUR TOWNSHIPMost of Decatur Tow
- Page 106 and 107:
FERGUSON TOWNSHIPThe southwestern p
- Page 111 and 112:
GIRARD TOWNSHIPThe northern two-thi
- Page 113 and 114:
The Supporting Natural Landscape is
- Page 115 and 116:
RecommendationsCore Habitat Area—
- Page 120 and 121:
GOSHEN TOWNSHIPMost of Goshen Towns
- Page 122 and 123:
Gifford Run Wetlands (pg. 81)Steepl
- Page 125 and 126:
GRAHAM TOWNSHIPThe landscape of Gra
- Page 128 and 129:
GREENWOOD TOWNSHIPGreenwood Townshi
- Page 131:
Gulich Township & Ramey BoroughPNDI
- Page 134 and 135:
herbaceous layer is somewhat sparse
- Page 136:
Huston TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 139 and 140:
Supporting Natural Landscape— Any
- Page 141 and 142:
Along the stream channel connecting
- Page 143 and 144:
Supporting Natural Landscape—Use
- Page 145:
Jordan TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 148:
Karthaus TownshipPNDI Rank Legal St
- Page 151:
Knox TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Status
- Page 154:
Lawrence Township & Clearfield Boro
- Page 158 and 159:
documented in Pennsylvania. It hibe
- Page 160 and 161:
allegheniensis) dominant in the can
- Page 162:
Morris TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Stat
- Page 165:
Penn Township, Grampian Borough,& L
- Page 168:
Pike Township & Curwensville Boroug
- Page 171:
Pine TownshipPNDI Rank Legal Status
- Page 174 and 175:
pine species (Lycopodium dendroideu
- Page 176 and 177:
Threats and StressesFoot traffic on
- Page 178 and 179:
wetlands to determine its uniquenes
- Page 180:
Sandy Township, Dubois City, & Fall
- Page 183 and 184:
eeding season, and they will be sen
- Page 185:
Union TownshipPNDI RankGlobal State
- Page 188:
Woodward Township, Brisbin Borough,
- Page 191 and 192:
RECOMMENDATIONSThe following are ge
- Page 193 and 194:
situations, the site is effectively
- Page 195 and 196:
GLOSSARYAlluvium: detrital deposits
- Page 197 and 198:
LITERATURE CITEDAnonymous. 1985. A
- Page 199 and 200:
Naeem., S. (Chair), F.S. Chapin III
- Page 201 and 202:
GIS DATA SOURCESBedrock geologic un
- Page 203 and 204:
APPENDIX IIPENNSYLVANIA NATURAL HER
- Page 205 and 206:
Evidence of Disturbance (logging, g
- Page 207 and 208:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 209 and 210:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 211 and 212:
GLOBAL STATECOMMUNITY NAME RANK RAN
- Page 213 and 214:
APPENDIX V bPENNSYLVANIA STATUSNati
- Page 215 and 216:
small numbers throughout their rang
- Page 217 and 218:
State Element RanksS1 = Critically
- Page 219 and 220:
Photo: Lisa SmithHairy rock-cress (
- Page 221:
The Sustainable Forestry Initiative