13.07.2015 Views

An Introduction to the Invertebrates, Second Edition - tiera.ru

An Introduction to the Invertebrates, Second Edition - tiera.ru

An Introduction to the Invertebrates, Second Edition - tiera.ru

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WHAT DO MOLECULES TELLUS ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN PHYLA?279of <strong>the</strong> prosoma bear <strong>the</strong> four pairs of walking legs. The unique limbpattern of <strong>the</strong> prosoma is not due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> absence of any segmentsbut <strong>to</strong> differences in Hox gene expression: for example no antennaecan be formed in <strong>the</strong> first segment because as a result of such adifference Dll is not expressed <strong>the</strong>re, and <strong>the</strong> siting of chelicerateappendages relates <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> confinement of Ubx expression <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>opisthosoma. In all living chelicerates studied, <strong>the</strong> expression ofHox genes shows that <strong>the</strong> prosoma as a whole corresponds <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>head of insects and c<strong>ru</strong>staceans. The appendages used as jaws bymany insects and c<strong>ru</strong>staceans are used as legs by chelicerates.MyriapodsIn myriapods <strong>the</strong> most anterior segment bears antennae, while <strong>the</strong>second has mandibles, where <strong>the</strong> expression of Dll promotes a longjointed mandible in contrast <strong>to</strong> insects and c<strong>ru</strong>staceans, and <strong>the</strong>remay be maxillae and sometimes a pair of poison claws. All moreposterior segments express both Ubx and Abd-A and have similarwalking legs. The old idea that insects were derived from myriapodlikearthropods is not supported by any kind of molecular evidence.Myriapods, like chelicerates, have <strong>the</strong> same set of Hox genes asinsects and all o<strong>the</strong>r groups of arthropods; that <strong>the</strong>se genes have notbeen used <strong>to</strong> make specialised segments does not relate <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong>insects in particular, and some o<strong>the</strong>r evidence suggests that <strong>the</strong>ymay be closer <strong>to</strong> chelicerates.Onychophora are found <strong>to</strong> have exactly <strong>the</strong> same set of Hoxgenes as centipedes, with homologues for each gene expressed inDrosophila. Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong>re is specialisation of appendages, <strong>the</strong>genes are <strong>the</strong>re.In summary, Hox genes, discovered and first studied in relation <strong>to</strong>on<strong>to</strong>genetic development, can also assist <strong>the</strong> assessment of homologyand hence <strong>the</strong> investigation of phylogeny. Arthropods are seen <strong>to</strong>be a monophyletic phylum sharing common Hox genes and havinga common origin of segmentation, with early divergence of downstreamgenes that later led <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> separation of <strong>the</strong> four maingroups. Figure 20.4 indicates a possible phylogeny of <strong>the</strong>se groups.Fig. 20.4 A possible phylogeny for<strong>the</strong> arthropod classes and relatedphyla. Alternatively, Insecta mayhave arisen from among C<strong>ru</strong>stacea.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!