13.07.2015 Views

Lights and shadows of spiritualism

Lights and shadows of spiritualism

Lights and shadows of spiritualism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

" PEOPLE EKO.U THE OTHER WORLD.- c6rliavc not bcou able to recognise the features <strong>of</strong> a single face."On the next page I lincl,— " What go to constitute a likeness area number <strong>of</strong> lines about the eyes, nose, <strong>and</strong> mouth, as thin as aknife-blade's edge; the expression <strong>of</strong> eye, shape <strong>of</strong> features, colour,<strong>and</strong> hau'—these, in such a light as this, are indistinguishable."The paragraph immediately following tells us that the light is sopoor, " one cannot, with untrained eye, distinguish accuratelybetween forms varying as much as six inches in height." Similaravow'als occur all through the book. Strong as they may appear,the testimony <strong>of</strong> unprejudiced observers is still stronger. Thelight at Chittenden was a libel on the term " darkness visible.""What, in view <strong>of</strong> such a fact, can be the value <strong>of</strong> the engi'avings <strong>of</strong>" materialised " forms, &c., with which the volume is pr<strong>of</strong>uselydecorated ? Not one has the slightest pretension to be considereda portrait. They are, without exception, fancy sketches evolvedfrom the inner consciousness <strong>of</strong> the artist. It is thus romancesare illustrated. It is not thus that men truly scientific illustratetheir works. But, putting this aside, xvliat was the value <strong>of</strong> thenumerous recognitions <strong>of</strong> departed relatives <strong>and</strong> friends vhich we aresolemnly assured occurred Does not every c<strong>and</strong>id reasoner.'answer, as I answer, that they w-ere valueless ? Even had theseso-called recognitions been honestly described, they would serveonly to prove the insaneenthusiasm <strong>of</strong> persons able to conjure updeparted relatives in figures whose features tliey could not discern,<strong>and</strong> whose voices they did not hear. But the descriptions, as I amnow about to show, are not honest.On page 271, we learn how there appeared " an Arab, an oldfriend <strong>of</strong> a lady w^ell known in magazine literature as Aunt Sue.""'Our author's description <strong>of</strong> the said Arab is glowing. " He was<strong>of</strong> short stature, slight <strong>and</strong> wiry build, <strong>and</strong> his very salaam to thelady, when recognised, was in marked contrast with the constrainedbows <strong>of</strong> the Indians, <strong>and</strong> the more or less ungracefulsalutations <strong>of</strong> the whites. His name is Yusef. He was dressedin a white tunic, gathered at the waist by a sash, <strong>and</strong> the skirtornamented with three equi-distant b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> red, <strong>of</strong> the samewidth. On his head was the national fe/, <strong>and</strong> in his sash Wiis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!