13.07.2015 Views

Impact of Crime on Small Businesses Report 2008 - Gauteng Online

Impact of Crime on Small Businesses Report 2008 - Gauteng Online

Impact of Crime on Small Businesses Report 2008 - Gauteng Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE IMPACT OF CRIME ON SMALL BUSINESSESSurvey resp<strong>on</strong>dents were asked to estimate both their direct and indirect losses toincidents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime in the past year. This secti<strong>on</strong> uses the survey data to examine theec<strong>on</strong>omic impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime in detail, using ec<strong>on</strong>ometric modelling. It examines twospecific areas:1. The actual and statistically expected cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime2. The factors that characterise firms impacted by crimeTable 7 shows the sum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> indirect and direct costs, per incident, by firm size(measured by turnover).Table 7: Mean and median costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime by turnoverTurnover per year Mean Median>R5,000 R1 650 R950R5,000 - R9,999 R4 831 R2 750R10,000 - R14,999 R4 040 R2 900R15,000 - R24,999 R23 972 R2 750R25,000 - R49,000 R3 382 R2 267R50,000 - R74,999 R8 028 R3 875R75,000 - R99,999 R2 758 R1 433R100,000 – R199,999 R6 630 R1 417R200,000 – R399,999 R2 030 R1 000R400,000 – R599,999 R12 899 R3 500R600,000 – R799,999 R2 796 R960R800,000 – R999,999 R37 803 R4 813More than R1m R49 203 R4 833Total R15 556 R2 250These results illustrate that, especially for smaller firms, the average costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> acrime incident can c<strong>on</strong>stitute a large proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their turnover. This finding isechoed by research in former Eastern bloc and Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> countries, which foundthat the cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime as a proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> company revenues is greater for small and micr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>irms than large firms, despite smaller and micro firms experiencing fewer incidents<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime. Similarly, a study in Jamaica found that the direct costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crimeamounted to two percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> revenue for large and medium firms, and nine percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>revenue for micro firms. 19The results presented in Table 7 are the costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime if a firm is a victim <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime.The probabilities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a business experiencing an incident <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime are presented inTable 8.43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!