16.07.2015 Views

The Grocery Gap: Who Has Access to Healthy - The Food Trust

The Grocery Gap: Who Has Access to Healthy - The Food Trust

The Grocery Gap: Who Has Access to Healthy - The Food Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>AcknowledgmentsPolicyLink and <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> are grateful <strong>to</strong> thefunders who supported the development andpublication of this report, including the ConvergencePartnership and the Kresge Foundation.<strong>The</strong> research for this study was conducted withindispensable assistance from Diana Fischmann(former intern, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>), who initiallycollected, reviewed, and summarized manyof the studies, and Allison Hagey (PolicyLink)who adeptly assisted with the data analysis andmanuscript development. Many thanks <strong>to</strong> JenneferKeller, Jon Jeter, and Leslie Yang (PolicyLink), andLance Loethen (<strong>The</strong> Reinvestment Fund) for theirassistance. Our gratitude also extends <strong>to</strong> JudithBell and Rebecca Flournoy (PolicyLink), JohnWeidman (<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>), and Ira Goldstein (<strong>The</strong>Reinvestment Fund) who provided helpful guidanceand feedback throughout the research process.2


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Contents57111321232532PrefaceExecutive SummaryIntroductionFindingsImplications for PolicyMethodsReferencesNotes3


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Improving access <strong>to</strong> healthy food is acritical component of an agenda <strong>to</strong> buildan equitable and sustainable food system.4


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>PrefaceFor decades, low-income communities of color havesuffered as grocery s<strong>to</strong>res and fresh, affordablefood disappeared from their neighborhoods.Advocates have long drawn attention <strong>to</strong> this criticalissue and crafted policy solutions, but access <strong>to</strong>healthy food is just now entering the national policydebate. While the problem is obvious <strong>to</strong> impactedcommunities, good policy must also be based onsolid data about the issue and its consequences.Unfortunately, it often takes years for the research<strong>to</strong> catch up with pressing needs in his<strong>to</strong>ricallyunderserved communities. Sometimes information isnot available. Other times, evidence is accumulatingbut it is buried in journals not widely read bypolicymakers. Or it is produced by practitioners andadvocates for local action campaigns and not acceptedby researchers or shared with policymakers or thebroader field. Too often, research focusing on lowincomepeople and communities of color, informedby their experiences, or conducted in partnershipwith them, is perceived as a political strategy,rather than as a legitimate search <strong>to</strong> understandproblems and inform strategies for change.PolicyLink and <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> conducted thisinquiry <strong>to</strong> summarize the existing evidence base,carefully reviewing more than 132 studies. Wefound that a large and consistent body of evidencesupports what residents have long observed: manylow-income communities, communities of color,and sparsely populated rural areas do not havesufficient opportunities <strong>to</strong> buy healthy, affordablefood. <strong>The</strong> consequences are also clear: decreasedaccess <strong>to</strong> healthy food means people in low-incomecommunities suffer more from diet-related diseaseslike obesity and diabetes than those in higherincomeneighborhoods with easy access <strong>to</strong> healthyfood, particularly fresh fruits and vegetables.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adul<strong>to</strong>besity rates are 51 percent higher for AfricanAmericans than whites, and 21 percent higherfor Latinos. Black and Latino children are morelikely <strong>to</strong> become obese than white children. <strong>The</strong>lack of healthy food retail also hinders communityeconomic development in neighborhoods thatneed private investment, activity hubs, and jobs.Thankfully, the tide is beginning <strong>to</strong> turn. Researchersand policymakers are coming <strong>to</strong> consensus thatthis is a critical issue. And they are recognizing thatcommunities have developed innovative, sustainablesolutions that can work in other locales and at largerscales. In December 2009, 39 members of Congressfrom both political parties issued a resolution in theHouse of Representatives recognizing the need fornational policy <strong>to</strong> address limited access <strong>to</strong> healthyfood in underserved communities. <strong>The</strong> President’s2011 budget calls for more than $400 million <strong>to</strong>establish a national <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong> Financing Initiative,and this initiative is a key component of the FirstLady’s Let’s Move campaign <strong>to</strong> reduce childhoodobesity. Legislation <strong>to</strong> create a <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>Financing Initiative is expected <strong>to</strong> be introduced inboth the House and the Senate in Spring 2010.This report presents powerful data. It confirmsthat as a nation we must answer the appeals ofcommunity activists seeking access <strong>to</strong> healthy foodfor their families and their neighborhoods. Wehope that it provides policymakers, advocates,philanthropists, and others with information,evidence, and analysis that can inform their efforts<strong>to</strong> eliminate “food deserts” from neighborhoodsand communities across the country.Inequitable access <strong>to</strong> healthy food is a majorcontribu<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> health disparities. According <strong>to</strong> theAngela Glover BlackwellFounder and CEOPolicyLinkYael LehmannExecutive Direc<strong>to</strong>r<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>5


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>In hundreds of neighborhoodsacross the country, nutritious,affordable, and high qualityfood is out of reach —particularly low-incomeneighborhoods, communitiesof color, and rural areas.6


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Executive SummaryAn apple a day?For millions of Americans—especially peopleliving in low-income communities of color—finding a fresh apple is not so easy. Full-servicegrocery s<strong>to</strong>res, farmers’ markets, and other vendorsthat sell fresh fruits, vegetables, and other healthyfoods cannot be found in their neighborhoods.What can be found, often in great abundance,are convenience s<strong>to</strong>res and fast food restaurantsthat mainly sell cheap, high-fat, high-sugar,processed foods and offer few healthy options.Without access <strong>to</strong> healthy foods, a nutritiousdiet and good health are out of reach. Andwithout grocery s<strong>to</strong>res and other freshfood retailers, communities are missing thecommercial hubs that make neighborhoodslivable, and help local economies thrive.For decades, community activists have organizedaround the lack of access <strong>to</strong> healthy foods asan economic, health, and social justice issue. Asconcerns grow over healthcare and the country’sworsening obesity epidemic, “food deserts” — areaswhere there is little or no access <strong>to</strong> healthy andaffordable food—have catapulted <strong>to</strong> the forefron<strong>to</strong>f public policy discussions. Policymakers atthe local, state, and national level have begunrecognizing the role that access <strong>to</strong> healthy foodplays in promoting healthy local economies,healthy neighborhoods, and healthy people.This report, a summary of our current knowledgeabout food deserts and their impacts oncommunities, provides evidence <strong>to</strong> inform thispolicymaking.To assess the current evidence base in thisdynamic and fast-growing field of research, wecompiled the most comprehensive bibliography<strong>to</strong> date of studies examining food access and itsimplications conducted in the United States overthe past 20 years. This bibliography incorporates a<strong>to</strong>tal of 132 studies: Sixty-one published in peerreviewedjournals and primarily conducted byuniversity-based researchers and 71 conductedby practitioners or policy researchers, sometimesin collaboration with academic researchers, andself-published (also known as “grey literature”).<strong>The</strong> studies include three nationwide analysesof food s<strong>to</strong>re availability and neighborhood,city, county, regional, statewide, and multistateanalyses covering 22 states across the country.Findings1. <strong>Access</strong>ing healthy food is a challengefor many Americans—particularly thoseliving in low-income neighborhoods,communities of color, and rural areas. Inhundreds of neighborhoods across the country,nutritious, affordable, and high quality foodis largely missing. Studies that measure foods<strong>to</strong>re availability and availability of healthy foodsin nearby s<strong>to</strong>res find major disparities in foodaccess by race and income and for low-density,rural areas.• Lack of supermarkets. A 2009 study bythe U.S. Department of Agriculture foundthat 23.5 million people lack access <strong>to</strong> asupermarket within a mile of their home.A recent multistate study found that lowincomecensus tracts had half as manysupermarkets as wealthy tracts. Anothermultistate study found that eight percen<strong>to</strong>f African Americans live in a tract with asupermarket, compared <strong>to</strong> 31 percent ofwhites. And a nationwide analysis foundthere are 418 rural “food desert” countieswhere all residents live more than 10 milesfrom a supermarket or supercenter—this is 20 percent of rural counties.7


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>• Lack of healthy, high quality foodsin nearby food s<strong>to</strong>res. In Detroit andNew Haven, produce quality is lowerin low-income communities of colorcompared <strong>to</strong> more affluent or raciallymixed neighborhoods. In Albany, NewYork, 80 percent of nonwhite residentscannot find low-fat milk or high-fiberbread in their neighborhoods. And inBaltimore, 46 percent of lower-incomeneighborhoods have limited access <strong>to</strong>healthy food (based on a healthy foodavailability survey) compared <strong>to</strong> 13 percen<strong>to</strong>f higher-income neighborhoods.• Predominance of convenience/corner/liquor s<strong>to</strong>res. Nationally, low-income zipcodes have 30 percent more conveniences<strong>to</strong>res, which tend <strong>to</strong> lack healthyitems, than middle-income zip codes.• Lack of transportation access <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>res.Residents in many urban areas (includingSeattle, Central and South Los Angeles, andEast Austin, Texas) have few transportationoptions <strong>to</strong> reach supermarkets. Inadequatetransportation can be a major challenge forrural residents, given the long distances <strong>to</strong>s<strong>to</strong>res. In Mississippi—which has the highes<strong>to</strong>besity rate of any state—over 70 percen<strong>to</strong>f food stamp eligible households travelmore than 30 miles <strong>to</strong> reach a supermarket.2. Better access corresponds withhealthier eating. Studies find that residentswith greater access <strong>to</strong> supermarkets or a greaterabundance of healthy foods in neighborhoodfood s<strong>to</strong>res consume more fresh produce andother healthful items.• For every additional supermarket ina census tract, produce consumptionincreases 32 percent for AfricanAmericans and 11 percent for whites,according <strong>to</strong> a multistate study.• A survey of produce availability in NewOrleans’ small neighborhood s<strong>to</strong>res foundthat for each additional meter of shelfspace devoted <strong>to</strong> fresh vegetables, residentseat an additional 0.35 servings per day.• In rural Mississippi, adults living in “fooddesert” counties lacking large supermarketsare 23 percent less likely <strong>to</strong> consume therecommended fruits and vegetables thanthose in counties that have supermarkets,controlling for age, sex, race, andeducation.3. <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> healthy food is associatedwith lower risk for obesity and otherdiet-related chronic diseases. Researchersfind that residents who live near supermarketsor in areas where food markets sellingfresh produce (supermarkets, grocery s<strong>to</strong>res,farmers’ markets, etc.) outnumber food s<strong>to</strong>resthat generally do not (such as corner s<strong>to</strong>res)have lower rates of diet-related diseases thantheir counterparts in neighborhoods lackingfood access.• A multistate study found that peoplewith access <strong>to</strong> only supermarkets or<strong>to</strong> supermarkets and grocery s<strong>to</strong>reshave the lowest rates of obesity andoverweight and those without access <strong>to</strong>supermarkets have the highest rates.• In California and New York City, residentsliving in areas with higher densities of freshfood markets, compared <strong>to</strong> conveniences<strong>to</strong>res and fast food restaurants, havelower rates of obesity. In California,obesity and diabetes rates are 20 percenthigher for those living in the least healthy“food environments,” controlling forhousehold income, race/ethnicity, age,gender, and physical activity levels.• Using statistical modeling techniques thatcontrol for a variety of fac<strong>to</strong>rs, researchersestimate that adding a new grocery s<strong>to</strong>re <strong>to</strong>a high poverty neighborhood in Indianapoliswould lead <strong>to</strong> a three pound weightdecrease among residents, while eliminatinga fast food restaurant in a neighborhoodwith a high density of fast food wouldlead <strong>to</strong> a one pound weight decrease.• In Chicago and Detroit, residents wholive farther from grocery s<strong>to</strong>res thanfrom convenience s<strong>to</strong>res and fast food8


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>restaurants have significantly higher rates ofpremature death from diabetes.4. New and improved healthy food retailin underserved communities createsjobs and helps <strong>to</strong> revitalize low-incomeneighborhoods. Though the economicimpacts of food retailers are understudied,we know that grocery s<strong>to</strong>res contribute <strong>to</strong>community economic development. Analysisof a successful statewide public-privateinitiative <strong>to</strong> bring new or revitalized grocerys<strong>to</strong>res <strong>to</strong> underserved neighborhoods inPennsylvania provides positive evidence thatfresh food markets can create jobs, bolster localeconomies, and revitalize neighborhoods. <strong>The</strong>effort has created or retained 4,860 jobs in78 underserved urban and rural communitiesthroughout the state. Analyses of s<strong>to</strong>ressupported by the effort find they lead <strong>to</strong>increased economic activity in surroundingcommunities.Implications for Policy<strong>The</strong> evidence is clear that many communities—predominantly low-income, urban communitiesof color and rural areas—lack adequate access <strong>to</strong>healthy food, and the evidence also suggests thatthe lack of access negatively impacts the healthof residents and neighborhoods. <strong>The</strong>se findingsindicate that policy interventions <strong>to</strong> increaseaccess <strong>to</strong> healthy food in “food deserts” willhelp people eat a healthy diet, while contributing<strong>to</strong> community economic development.For many years, impacted communities andtheir advocates have been implementinga variety of strategies <strong>to</strong> increase access <strong>to</strong>fresh, wholesome foods, including:• Attracting or developing grocerys<strong>to</strong>res and supermarkets;• Developing other retail outlets suchas farmers’ markets, public markets,cooperatives, farmstands, communitysupportedagriculture programs, andmobile vendors (and ensuring publicbenefits can be used at these venues);• Increasing the s<strong>to</strong>ck of fruits, vegetables,and other healthy foods at neighborhoodcorner s<strong>to</strong>res or small groceries;• Growing food locally through backyardand community gardens and largerscaleurban agriculture; and• Improving transportation <strong>to</strong> grocerys<strong>to</strong>res and farmers’ markets.Improving access <strong>to</strong> healthy food is a criticalcomponent of an agenda <strong>to</strong> build an equitableand sustainable food system. It is time fora nationwide focus <strong>to</strong> ensure that healthyfood choices are available <strong>to</strong> all, buildingon these local efforts and innovations.Smart public policies and programs should supportcommunities in their efforts <strong>to</strong> develop, implement,and test strategies that increase healthy foodaccess. Government agencies at the local, state,and federal level should prioritize the issue ofinequitable food access in low-income, underservedareas. Programs and policies that are workingshould be expanded and new programs shouldbe developed <strong>to</strong> bring more grocery s<strong>to</strong>res andother fresh food retail outlets <strong>to</strong> neighborhoodswithout access <strong>to</strong> healthy foods. Transportationbarriers <strong>to</strong> fresh food outlets should be addressed.Whenever possible, policies <strong>to</strong> address fooddeserts should link with comprehensive efforts <strong>to</strong>build strong regional food and farm systems.Residents of low-income communities andcommunities of color in urban and rural areashave suffered for <strong>to</strong>o long from a lack ofaccess <strong>to</strong> healthy food. With local and stateprograms showing enormous promise, now isthe time for policymakers <strong>to</strong> enact policies thatwill catalyze the replication of local and stateinnovations and bring them <strong>to</strong> a national scale.9


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><strong>The</strong> presence of s<strong>to</strong>res sellinghealthy, affordable food makesit possible <strong>to</strong> eat “five a day”and consume a healthful diet.10


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>To assess the current evidence base, we gatheredthe studies conducted in the United States over thepast 20 years <strong>to</strong> create the most comprehensivebibliography on this <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>to</strong> date. 2 We founda <strong>to</strong>tal of 132 studies that examined access <strong>to</strong>healthy food and its impacts. <strong>The</strong>y include threenationwide analyses of food s<strong>to</strong>re availabilityand neighborhood, city, county, regional,statewide, and multistate analyses covering 22states throughout the country. <strong>The</strong> bibliographyalso includes three review studies. 3, 4, 5 Sixty-oneof the studies were published in peer-reviewedjournals and generally conducted by academicresearchers, and 71 were self-published andgenerally conducted by practitioners. (See pages23-24 for a full description of our methodology.)Studies find that residentswith greater access <strong>to</strong>supermarkets or a greaterabundance of healthy foodsin neighborhood food s<strong>to</strong>resconsume more fresh produceand other healthful items.12


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Findings1. <strong>Access</strong>ing healthy food is achallenge for many Americans—particularly those living inlow-income neighborhoods,communities of color, andrural areasResearchers have measured geographic access<strong>to</strong> healthy foods in many different ways, andat nearly every imaginable scale: from nationalsamples <strong>to</strong> detailed assessments of specificneighborhoods. Only one study has sought <strong>to</strong>calculate the extent of the problem nationally.<strong>The</strong> U.S. Department of Agriculture’s 2009 “fooddesert” study examined access <strong>to</strong> supermarkets anddetermined that 23.5 million people cannot accessa supermarket within one mile of their home.Most studies (a <strong>to</strong>tal of 113) examine whethersupermarkets or healthy foods are equitablydistributed across communities according <strong>to</strong>socioeconomic status, racial composition, orlevel of urbanization (population density). 6<strong>The</strong>ir findings are remarkably consistent: peopleliving in low-income neighborhoods, minorityneighborhoods, and rural communities facemuch greater challenges finding healthy food,especially those who lack good transportationoptions <strong>to</strong> reach full-service grocery s<strong>to</strong>res.Ninety-seven of these studies found inequitableaccess <strong>to</strong> healthy foods, 14 had some mixedresults, and two studies did not find inequities.Disparities in supermarket access inurban areas by race and incomeMany researchers use supermarkets as a proxy forfood access because they provide the most reliableaccess <strong>to</strong> a wide variety of nutritious and affordableproduce and other foods compared <strong>to</strong> other typesof food outlets such as convenience s<strong>to</strong>res andsmaller grocery s<strong>to</strong>res. Several of these studies lookat the distribution of different types of food s<strong>to</strong>res,such as supermarkets, smaller grocery s<strong>to</strong>res, and“fringe retailers” such as convenience and corners<strong>to</strong>res across different community types. <strong>The</strong>y findthat lower-income communities and communities ofcolor have fewer supermarkets, more conveniences<strong>to</strong>res, and smaller grocery s<strong>to</strong>res than wealthierand predominantly white communities.Eighty-nine national and local studies documentuneven geographic access <strong>to</strong> supermarketsin urban areas according <strong>to</strong> income, race, orboth 7-87 and nine had mixed results. 88-96Nationwide study findings include:• Low-income zip codes have 25 percentfewer chain supermarkets and 1.3times as many convenience s<strong>to</strong>rescompared <strong>to</strong> middle-income zip codes.Predominantly black zip codes have abouthalf the number of chain supermarketscompared <strong>to</strong> predominantly whitezip codes, and predominantly Latinoareas have only a third as many. 46• Low-income neighborhoods have halfas many supermarkets as the wealthiestneighborhoods and four times as manysmaller grocery s<strong>to</strong>res, according <strong>to</strong> anassessment of 685 urban and rural censustracts in three states. <strong>The</strong> same studyfound four times as many supermarketsin predominantly white neighborhoodscompared <strong>to</strong> predominantly black ones. 38Another multistate study found thateight percent of African Americanslive in a tract with a supermarketcompared <strong>to</strong> 31 percent of whites. 4213


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Local studies demonstrate similar trends:• In Los Angeles there are 2.3 times as manysupermarkets per household in low-povertyareas compared <strong>to</strong> high-poverty areas.Predominantly white areas have 3.2 timesas many supermarkets as black areas and1.7 times as many as Latino areas. 49• Among affluent neighborhoods inAtlanta, those that are predominantlywhite have better grocery s<strong>to</strong>re accessthan those that are predominantlyblack, indicating that race may be afac<strong>to</strong>r independent of income. 30• In West Louisville, Kentucky, a low-incomeAfrican American community that suffersfrom high rates of diabetes, there is onesupermarket for every 25,000 residents,compared <strong>to</strong> the county average of onesupermarket for every 12,500 residents. 17• In Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC, the city’s lowestincomewards (Wards 7 and 8) have onesupermarket for every 70,000 peoplewhile two of the three highest-incomewards (Wards 2 and 3) have one forevery 11,881 people. 20 One in five ofthe city’s food stamp recipients lives in aneighborhood without a grocery s<strong>to</strong>re. 37• In California and in New York City, lowincomeneighborhoods have fewerpurveyors of healthy foods (supermarkets,produce stands) compared <strong>to</strong> outlets thatprimarily sell unhealthy foods (conveniences<strong>to</strong>res, fast food restaurants). 14, 47 Lowincomeneighborhoods in Californiahave 20 percent fewer healthy foodsources than higher-income ones. 14• In unincorporated communities (colonias)located along the U.S.-Mexico borderin Texas, residents in neighborhoodswith higher levels of deprivation(measured by income, transportation,lack of infrastructure, etc.) travel farther<strong>to</strong> reach the nearest supermarket orgrocery s<strong>to</strong>re and have lower access<strong>to</strong> a variety of food s<strong>to</strong>res. 51Disparities in access <strong>to</strong> healthyfood at neighborhood s<strong>to</strong>res inurban areas by race and incomeOther studies gather much more detailed data,conducting in-s<strong>to</strong>re surveys <strong>to</strong> assess the availability,variety, quality, and price of particular healthy itemsor grocery “market baskets.” Such surveys offera more precise look at healthy food availability inneighborhoods, but they are labor-intensive sogenerally focus on smaller geographic areas.Among these studies, 21 found that food s<strong>to</strong>resin lower-income neighborhoods and communitiesof color are less likely <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ck healthy foods,offer lower quality items, and have higherprices compared <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>res in higher-income or13, 15, 17, 18, 20-23,predominantly white communities,28, 31, 33, 35, 52, 68, 69, 96-99, 103, 105, 106and seven foundmixed results (for example, lower quality butsimilar prices and selection) 9, 81, 88, 89, 100, 102 or nodifference. 101 In addition, a study based on focusgroups with residents in East Baltimore (a lowincomecommunity of color) found that they werereliant on small neighborhood s<strong>to</strong>res that chargedextremely high prices and lacked a good varietyand selection of healthy foods. 103 Findings include:• S<strong>to</strong>res carrying fruits and vegetables areunevenly distributed among different typesof communities in upstate New York: aminority neighborhood in Albany hasthe least access (4.6 s<strong>to</strong>res per 10,000residents), followed by a rural community(7.8), a small <strong>to</strong>wn (9.8), and a raciallymixed neighborhood in Albany (11.4). 32<strong>The</strong> same researchers find that eight in10 of Albany’s nonwhite residents livein a neighborhood that lacks any s<strong>to</strong>resselling low-fat milk or high-fiber bread. 33• S<strong>to</strong>res located in low-income and verylow-income zip codes in Los Angelesand Sacramen<strong>to</strong> are less likely <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ckhealthy foods than s<strong>to</strong>res in higher-incomeareas. 34 Three in 10 food s<strong>to</strong>res in a highpoverty,predominantly African Americancommunity in Los Angeles lacked fruits andvegetables while nearly all of the s<strong>to</strong>res ina contrast area that was low poverty andpredominantly white sold fresh produce. 5214


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Share of Baltimore Neighborhood <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res with Low Availability of <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>,by Neighborhood Race and Income, 2006• Produce quality is lower in a predominantlyblack, low-income community in Detroitcompared <strong>to</strong> an adjacent suburbancommunity that is racially mixed andmiddle-income. 81 Produce quality isalso lower in New Haven, Connecticut’slow-income communities compared<strong>to</strong> more affluent neighborhoods. 9• In Baltimore (see chart above), a healthyfood availability survey of 226 supermarkets,grocery s<strong>to</strong>res, convenience s<strong>to</strong>res, andbehind-glass s<strong>to</strong>res in 106 census tractsfound that 43 percent of predominantlyblack neighborhoods and 46 percent oflower-income neighborhoods were in thebot<strong>to</strong>m third of availability, compared <strong>to</strong>four percent of predominantly white and 13percent of higher-income neighborhoods.<strong>The</strong> supermarkets in predominantly blackand lower-income neighborhoods scoredlower for healthy food availability as well. 23Disparities in food s<strong>to</strong>re access aroundschools by race and incomeIn addition <strong>to</strong> the residential environment, researchersare beginning <strong>to</strong> examine the “food environment”around schools because of the link between access<strong>to</strong> convenience s<strong>to</strong>res and adolescent health. 121 Twostudies looked at convenience s<strong>to</strong>res in proximity<strong>to</strong> schools and found that schools with more lowincomeor nonwhite students or in urban areas, 104and schools located in low-income neighborhoodsor communities of color 107 are more likely <strong>to</strong>have at least one convenience s<strong>to</strong>re nearby.Rural food desertsWhile the majority of food desert studies focuson urban communities, 21 studies examined ruralcommunities. Twenty of them found significantfood access challenges in rural communities 21,29, 32, 33, 36, 43, 46, 50, 51, 70, 75, 95, 108-114, 116and one (thatlooked at Springfield, Oregon) did not find urbanruraldisparities. 54 <strong>The</strong> major issues in rural areasare different than those in urban areas given thelow population density, longer distances betweenretailers, and rapid rise of supercenters and theirimpact on other food retailers. Key findings include:• Controlling for population density, ruralareas have fewer food retailers of any typecompared <strong>to</strong> urban areas, and only 14percent the number of chain supermarkets. 46(See chart, next page) Another nationwide15


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Availability of <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res in Rural Areas by S<strong>to</strong>re Type, 2000analysis found that there are 418rural “food desert” counties where allresidents live 10 miles or more from thenearest supermarket or supercenter—20percent of all rural counties. 43• In the Mississippi Delta, over 70 percen<strong>to</strong>f households eligible <strong>to</strong> receivefood stamp benefits needed <strong>to</strong> travelmore than 30 miles <strong>to</strong> reach a largegrocery s<strong>to</strong>re or supermarket. 36• In New Mexico, rural residents haveaccess <strong>to</strong> fewer grocery s<strong>to</strong>res than urbanresidents, pay more for comparable items,and have less selection. <strong>The</strong> same marketbasket of groceries costs $85 for ruralresidents and $55 for urban residents. 113Transportation access2.Lack of transportation <strong>to</strong> supermarkets is a majorbarrier for residents in many communities. 115Assessments of Lexing<strong>to</strong>n (KY), Seattle (WA), Centraland South Los Angeles (CA), East Austin (TX), andTrinity County (CA) highlighted transportationchallenges. 11, 12, 22, 69, 116 Rural residents have highervehicle ownership generally, but those who lackreliable access <strong>to</strong> personal vehicles are particularlyisolated given the longer distances <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>res and12, 51, 114, 116, 117lack of public transportation options.Better access <strong>to</strong> healthy foodcorresponds with healthier eatingConsistent with the conclusions of a recent reviewstudy, 4 we found strong and consistent evidenceindicating a positive relationship between access<strong>to</strong> healthy food and eating behaviors. Withoutnearby access <strong>to</strong> healthy ingredients, familieshave a harder time meeting recommended dietaryguidelines for good health such as eating fruitsand vegetables and lowering fat intake. In asurvey of diabetic adults in New York’s East Harlemneighborhood, 40 percent said that they didnot follow the recommended dietary guidelinesbecause the necessary foods were less available andmore expensive in their neighborhood s<strong>to</strong>res. 31Of 14 studies that examine food access andconsumption of healthy foods, all but one of themfound a correlation between greater access andbetter eating behaviors. All of the studies in thiscategory were conducted by academic researchersand published in peer-reviewed journals. 118<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> supermarketsEight studies analyzed access <strong>to</strong> nearby supermarketsor large grocery s<strong>to</strong>res that sell a widevariety of healthy foods in relation <strong>to</strong> consumptionof fruits and vegetables, specific healthy foods (suchas low-fat milk or high-fiber bread), or a healthy diet(measured by an index of diet quality). Almost all16


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> Supermarkets and Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables by Race, 2002of these studies control for individual characteristicssuch as race and income and still find a relationshipbetween access and healthy eating. Six of thestudies found associations between supermarket42, 79, 91,access and healthy eating among adults109, 119, 120and one had mixed results. 78 Only onestudy examined access <strong>to</strong> food s<strong>to</strong>res and eatingbehaviors of adolescents (specifically, boys aged10 <strong>to</strong> 14); this study did not find a relationshipbetween supermarket access and fruit andvegetable consumption but did find that proximityof convenience s<strong>to</strong>res (where young people whodo not drive are more likely <strong>to</strong> shop) was associatedwith reduced fruit and vegetable intake. 121Some of the findings include:• African Americans living in a census tractwith a supermarket are more likely <strong>to</strong> meetdietary guidelines for fruits and vegetables,and for every additional supermarketin a tract, produce consumption rose32 percent. Among whites, eachadditional supermarket correspondedwith an 11 percent increase in produceconsumption (see chart above). 42 Thisstudy used a large sample: 10,230adults living in 208 urban, suburban,and rural census tracts in four states.• Adults with no supermarkets within a mileof their homes are 25 <strong>to</strong> 46 percent lesslikely <strong>to</strong> have a healthy diet than thosewith the most supermarkets near theirhomes, according <strong>to</strong> a study that useddata from North Carolina, Baltimore, andNew York City. A healthy diet was definedusing two different measures: the Alternate<strong>Healthy</strong> Eating Index, which measuresconsumption of foods related <strong>to</strong> low risk ofchronic disease, and a measure looking atconsumption of fats and processed meats. 91• Proximity <strong>to</strong> a supermarket is associatedwith increased fruit consumption amongfood stamp recipients (based on anationally representative sample). Similarpatterns were also seen with vegetableconsumption, though associationswere not statistically significant. 119• In rural Mississippi, adults living in “fooddesert” counties (defined as those lackinglarge supermarkets) are 23 percent lesslikely <strong>to</strong> consume the recommendedfruits and vegetables than those incounties that are not food deserts. 109• In Detroit’s East Side neighborhood, AfricanAmerican women with lower incomes areless likely <strong>to</strong> shop at supermarkets (whichare all located outside the neighborhood)and eat fruits and vegetables thanthose with higher incomes. 7917


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> fresh produce and otherhealthful foods in nearby s<strong>to</strong>resSeveral recent studies go beyond usingsupermarkets as proxies for healthy food accessand conduct in-s<strong>to</strong>re surveys <strong>to</strong> more accuratelymeasure the availability of healthy food items innearby s<strong>to</strong>res. 13, 21, 91, 122, 123 Others use residentsurveys <strong>to</strong> measure access <strong>to</strong> nutritious andquality foods and eating behaviors. 5, 124 Of the sixstudies in this category, all of them found thatincreased availability of produce or of specifichealthy foods (such as low-fat milk as a percentageof all milk) is associated with the increasedconsumption of those foods. Findings include:• In New Orleans, proximity <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ress<strong>to</strong>cking more fresh produce isassociated with higher vegetableconsumption. Each additional meter ofshelf space devoted <strong>to</strong> fresh vegetablesis associated with an additional 0.35servings of vegetables per day. 13• For participants in a communitybasedhealth promotion program inColorado, greater shelf space allocated<strong>to</strong> fresh produce correspondedwith greater increases in fruit andvegetable consumption. 122• <strong>The</strong> proportion of low-fat milk in s<strong>to</strong>resis positively and directly related <strong>to</strong> itsconsumption according <strong>to</strong> a New Yorkstate study 21 and a study that examinedareas of California and Hawaii. 123• One study asked residents <strong>to</strong> ranktheir access <strong>to</strong> healthy food and thenexamined their rankings in relation <strong>to</strong>their diets. Residents living in areas rankedby themselves or others as having theworst food environments were 22 <strong>to</strong>35 percent less likely <strong>to</strong> eat a healthydiet than those living in areas ranked ashaving the best food environments. 913. <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> healthy food isassociated with diet-relateddiseaseIn addition <strong>to</strong> making it possible—and evenmore likely—for residents <strong>to</strong> eat healthy diets,the availability of healthy food in communitiesis related <strong>to</strong> a host of diet-related diseasesincluding obesity and overweight, diabetes, andcardiovascular disease. Seventeen studies examinedthe relationship between healthy food accessand diet-related health outcomes; approximatelyhalf were conducted by academics and half wereconducted by policy researchers. Twelve found14, 24, 25, 27, 34, 45, 47, 72, 73, 125,a positive relationship,126, 128 127, 129, 145three studies had mixed results,78, 104and two studies had contrary findings.<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> supermarketsFive studies found that proximity <strong>to</strong> supermarketscorresponds with a lower body mass index (BMI),or rates of obesity, diabetes, or diet-related deathamong adults, 27, 71-73, 125 and one found the samecorrelation among adolescents. 45 Only two studiesfocused on children. One found that supermarketaccess was associated with lower BMI amongchildren in lower-density counties in Indianapolis(but not in higher-density ones). 127 <strong>The</strong> other trackedkindergarteners over four years and found that,controlling for individual characteristics, higherfruit and vegetable prices in their city or metrocorresponded with weight gain, but the density ofrestaurants, convenience s<strong>to</strong>res, or grocery s<strong>to</strong>resaround their schools did not make a difference. 145• Adults living in neighborhoods withsupermarkets or with supermarkets andgrocery s<strong>to</strong>res have the lowest rates ofobesity (21 percent) and overweight(60–62 percent) and those living inneighborhoods with no supermarketsand access <strong>to</strong> only convenience s<strong>to</strong>res,smaller grocery s<strong>to</strong>res, or both had thehighest rates (32–40 percent obesity;73–78 percent overweight), according <strong>to</strong>a study of more than 10,000 adults. 125• <strong>The</strong> lack of supermarket accesscorresponds with higher rates of dietrelateddeath in Philadelphia. 2718


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><strong>The</strong> Economic Impacts of Fresh <strong>Food</strong> RetailersDirect Economic Impacts:• Job opportunities• Local tax revenuesIndirect Economic Impacts:• Revitalized neighborhood housing markets• Asset-building for low-income homeowners (via appreciating real estate assets)• Workforce training and development• New businesses surrounding the s<strong>to</strong>re• Additional spending in the local economy generated by the s<strong>to</strong>re and the new jobs itcreates (the “multiplier effect”)• In Los Angeles, a longer distancetraveled <strong>to</strong> reach a grocery s<strong>to</strong>re wasassociated with higher BMI. Thosewho traveled more than 1.75 miles <strong>to</strong>a supermarket weighed 0.8 BMI unitsmore (4.8 pounds for a 5’5” person). 34• A national study of more than 70,000teens also found that increased availabilityof chain supermarkets was associatedwith lower rates of overweight. 45<strong>Food</strong> outlet mixSeveral studies 14, 24, 25, 47, 126 have found thatthe mix of food s<strong>to</strong>res available <strong>to</strong> residents isassociated with diet-related health outcomes:• Californians and New Yorkers living inareas with higher densities of fresh foodmarkets compared <strong>to</strong> convenience s<strong>to</strong>resand fast food restaurants have lowerrates of obesity. In California, obesity anddiabetes rates were 20 percent higherfor those living in the least healthy “foodenvironments,” controlling for individualfac<strong>to</strong>rs. 14 In New York City, increasing“BMI-healthy” food s<strong>to</strong>res in New Yorkneighborhoods corresponded withlower obesity rates (though decreasing“BMI-unhealthy” s<strong>to</strong>res did not). 47• In Indianapolis, BMI values correspondwith access <strong>to</strong> supermarkets and fastfood restaurants. Researchers estimatethat adding a new grocery s<strong>to</strong>re <strong>to</strong> ahigh-poverty neighborhood translatesin<strong>to</strong> a three pound weight decrease, andeliminating a fast food restaurant from afast food dense neighborhood (six or morefast food restaurants per square kilometer)translates in<strong>to</strong> a one pound decrease. 126• A 2009 study of Chicago’s food desertsfound that as the distance <strong>to</strong> the nearestgrocer increases relative <strong>to</strong> the distance <strong>to</strong>the nearest fringe food outlet, the Years ofPotential Life Loss (YPLL) due <strong>to</strong> diseasessuch as cancer, cardiovascular disease,diabetes, and liver disease increases. Thisrelationship is significant in AfricanAmerican communities, but less clear forwhite and Hispanic communities. 254. New and improved healthyfood retail in underservedcommunities creates jobs andhelps <strong>to</strong> revitalize low-incomeneighborhoodsBeyond the benefits <strong>to</strong> individual health describedabove, fresh food markets contribute <strong>to</strong> the overallhealth of neighborhoods and communities.<strong>Grocery</strong> s<strong>to</strong>res are known by economic developmentpractitioners <strong>to</strong> be high-volume “anchors” thatgenerate foot traffic and attract complementarys<strong>to</strong>res and services like banks, pharmacies, videorentals, and restaurants. 131 Yet compared <strong>to</strong> thestudy of food access and its health impacts, thestudy of economic impacts related <strong>to</strong> food retaildevelopment is an area of relatively limited research.Several methods have been developed <strong>to</strong> estimatethe demand for food retail in underserved19


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><strong>The</strong> Pennsylvania Fresh <strong>Food</strong> Financing Initiative hashelped develop supermarkets and other fresh foodoutlets in 78 underserved urban and rural areas,increasing access <strong>to</strong> healthy food for nearly 500,000residents and creating or retaining 4,860 jobs.communities. Studies that use local datasources find that these neighborhoods have thepotential <strong>to</strong> support thousands of square feetin additional grocery retail space. 56-67, 134 Onestudy estimated $8.7 billion dollars in annualgrocery leakage in inner-city neighborhoods. 135Some have also investigated the impact of newsupermarkets on nearby real estate values. Whennew food retailers enter areas that were previouslyunder-retailed, they can bring viability <strong>to</strong> urbanneighborhoods’ commercial real estate markets,and can change perceptions that economicallydistressed urban areas are undesirable places <strong>to</strong>operate businesses. 133 An assessment of the impac<strong>to</strong>f new supermarkets on neighborhood housingvalues in Philadelphia found that the values ofhomes located within one-quarter <strong>to</strong> one-halfmile of the new supermarkets increase by four <strong>to</strong>seven percent (an average of $1,500) after thes<strong>to</strong>res open, mitigating the downward trend in realestate values. In addition, the effect was larger inneighborhoods with weaker housing markets. 130Recent analyses of efforts <strong>to</strong> bring new grocerys<strong>to</strong>res in<strong>to</strong> underserved communities find that thesebusinesses are viable (even thriving), offer a goodselection of nutritious and affordable foods, andcontribute greatly <strong>to</strong> local economic development.An examination of the first full-service supermarket<strong>to</strong> locate in New York City’s Harlem neighborhood(thanks in part <strong>to</strong> a $2.5 million loan from the city<strong>to</strong> cover construction costs), four years after itsopening, found that the s<strong>to</strong>re allocated the sameamount of space <strong>to</strong> a similar variety of fresh fruitsand vegetables, fish, and meat as typical suburbansupermarkets, at similar prices. 136 <strong>The</strong> s<strong>to</strong>re has beencredited with catalyzing the revitalization of theneighborhood. 137Studies of the Pennsylvania Fresh <strong>Food</strong> FinancingInitiative (FFFI), a statewide public-private effortthat has helped develop 78 supermarkets andother fresh food outlets in underserved urbanand rural areas, also demonstrate the positiveimpacts of healthy food retailing. In addition<strong>to</strong> increasing access <strong>to</strong> healthy food for nearly500,000 residents, the effort resulted in:• Job creation. <strong>The</strong> initiative created orretained 4,860 jobs throughout the state. Arecent case study of selected supermarketsin the Philadelphia region found that thevast majority of jobs created through theinitiative (75 percent) were filled by localresidents living within three miles of theirworkplace. 138 A new s<strong>to</strong>re assisted bythe initiative that is part of the regionalShopRite chain created 258 jobs and morethan half were filled by local residents. 139When you add in the additional jobs thatare created through a new s<strong>to</strong>re’s multipliereffect, the <strong>to</strong>tal number of jobs becomesmuch higher: one grocery s<strong>to</strong>re that theeffort helped launch is estimated <strong>to</strong> havecreated 660 jobs directly and indirectly. 140• Economic development. New andimproved grocery s<strong>to</strong>res can catalyzecommercial revitalization in a community.An analysis of the economic impacts of fivenew s<strong>to</strong>res that opened with FFFI assistancefound that, for four of the s<strong>to</strong>res, <strong>to</strong>talemployment surrounding the supermarketincreased at a faster rate than citywidetrends. This suggests a positive effect onoverall economic activity resulting from theintroduction of a new supermarket. 13820


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Implications for PolicyExisting research provides clear evidence thatfood deserts exist in numerous low-incomecommunities and communities of color across thecountry, and that they have significant negativeimpacts on health, social equity, and local economicdevelopment. <strong>The</strong> balance of the research stronglysuggests that making affordable, healthy foodsmore available <strong>to</strong> underserved residents will lead <strong>to</strong>their making healthier choices about what <strong>to</strong> eatand, ultimately, better health, while contributing<strong>to</strong> economic and neighborhood revitalization.While there is general agreement in theliterature about the lack of access <strong>to</strong> healthyfoods and increasing evidence about itsconsequences, fewer researchers have focusedon the question of what are the most effectivesolutions. This search has largely been taken upby impacted communities and their advocatesand supporters. Across the country, they are:• Attracting or developing grocerys<strong>to</strong>res and supermarkets;• Developing other retail outlets suchas farmers’ markets, public markets,cooperatives, farmstands, communitysupportedagriculture programs, andmobile vendors (and ensuring publicbenefits can be used at these venues);• Increasing the s<strong>to</strong>ck of fruits, vegetables,and other healthy foods at neighborhoodcorner s<strong>to</strong>res or small groceries;• Growing food locally through backyardand community gardens and largerscaleurban agriculture; and• Improving transportation <strong>to</strong> grocerys<strong>to</strong>res and farmers’ markets.Communities are using a variety of strategies <strong>to</strong>increase access <strong>to</strong> healthy foods, and theirefforts provide several lessons for policymakersat the local, state, and federal level. 143Until more systemic solutions are instituted,transportation barriers <strong>to</strong> fresh food markets need<strong>to</strong> be removed. Community groups and plannersshould evaluate existing transportation routes andimprove coordination of bus routes, bus s<strong>to</strong>ps, andschedules or add vanpools or shuttles <strong>to</strong> maximizetransit access <strong>to</strong> grocery s<strong>to</strong>res and farmers’ markets.Longer-term transportation and land use planningshould promote the co-location of food retail,transit access, and affordable homes. Communitiesand retailers can launch programs such as mobilemarkets, grocery shuttles, and grocery vandelivery<strong>to</strong> improve access <strong>to</strong> healthy food.Community groups, residents, researchers, andgovernment agencies should work <strong>to</strong>gether <strong>to</strong>identify areas that lack access <strong>to</strong> healthy food and <strong>to</strong>understand local economic conditions and regionalfood systems. Areas lacking access should beprioritized, strategies for action need <strong>to</strong> identified,and then advocates need <strong>to</strong> demand the resources,programs, and policies <strong>to</strong> solve the access problem.Once underway, efforts should be moni<strong>to</strong>red <strong>to</strong>examine progress over time, and advocates shouldseek the expansion of successful approaches.Cities have many policy <strong>to</strong>ols they can use <strong>to</strong>incentivize and promote healthy food retailincluding land use planning, zoning, economicdevelopment and redevelopment, and nutritionassistance. A recent analysis of retailers’ locationdecisions found that the land availability, marketdemand (and data demonstrating that demand),construction and operations costs, and approval/zoning requirements all pose barriers <strong>to</strong> locatingin underserved urban areas. 141 Cities can help21


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>What Type of <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> Will Make a Difference?One question the research begins <strong>to</strong> address is whether supermarkets are the only solution <strong>to</strong> the “grocery gap” inlow-income communities.<strong>The</strong> majority of studies use supermarkets (typically defined by a sales volume of more than $2 million or more than50 employees) as a proxy for access <strong>to</strong> healthy foods. This makes sense because most Americans do the bulk of theirgrocery shopping at these s<strong>to</strong>res (and increasingly at larger supercenters) 142 and supermarkets more consistently36, 44offer a good variety and selection of affordable and nutritious foods compared <strong>to</strong> other types of food retailers.But more and more studies are using in-s<strong>to</strong>re surveys <strong>to</strong> examine the availability of particular healthy items or healthy“market baskets” and their consumption. <strong>The</strong>se studies find the same relationship between access and diet as studiesthat look at supermarkets.This suggests that health could be improved through many different food access strategies.overcome these barriers by providing publiclyowned land for food retailers, helping with landassembly, and identifying and marketing sites forgrocery s<strong>to</strong>re development. Several cities haveconducted internal assessments <strong>to</strong> understandhow their agencies and departments can fosterhealthy food retail in underserved neighborhoods.In New York City, the departments of health,planning, housing, economic development, andthe Mayor’s office all played a role in developingand implementing several innovative programsincluding: Green Carts, <strong>to</strong> help produce vendorslocate in underserved neighborhoods with highrates of obesity and diabetes; <strong>Healthy</strong> Bodegas, <strong>to</strong>improve healthy offerings in corner s<strong>to</strong>res; HealthBucks, <strong>to</strong> promote produce purchasing at farmers’markets; and FRESH, <strong>to</strong> provide zoning and financialincentives <strong>to</strong> promote grocery s<strong>to</strong>re development,upgrading, and expansion in underserved areas.At the state and national level, fresh foodfinancing initiatives—based on Pennsylvania’ssuccessful program (described on page 20)—thatcreate public-private partnerships <strong>to</strong> supportthe development, renovation, and expansionof retail outlets offering fresh healthy food(such as grocery s<strong>to</strong>res, farmers’ markets, andcooperatives) should be developed. 144 <strong>The</strong> successof the Pennsylvania Fresh <strong>Food</strong> Financing Initiativedemonstrates that public investments can leveragesignificant private investment and dramaticallyimprove healthy food access. Policy replicationefforts have been successful in Illinois, New York,and New Orleans, and numerous replicationefforts are underway in states across the country.Given the national scope of the problem, thissuccessful state policy should be brought <strong>to</strong>a national scale so this innovative financingmechanism can be available <strong>to</strong> all communities.Successful policies and programs need <strong>to</strong> bereplicated and brought <strong>to</strong> a greater scale <strong>to</strong>increase healthy food access. A problem withsuch broad and negative impacts on health,economy, and equity warrants a focus at alllevels—community, state, and national. Now isthe time for bold, nationwide efforts <strong>to</strong> ensurethat healthy food choices are available <strong>to</strong> all.22


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>MethodsBetween May and July 2009, PolicyLink and<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> created a comprehensivebibliography of studies related <strong>to</strong> food accessand/or food access and health across theUnited States. Unlike previous review studies,which typically only include published work, wesought <strong>to</strong> include “grey literature,” or studies,reports, and analyses that are not published inpeer-reviewed journals. Public health agencies,community-based organizations, and policygroups frequently conduct primary data analysesof retail food access <strong>to</strong> inform their activities,but generally do not take the additional steps <strong>to</strong>submit their studies <strong>to</strong> journals for publication.We used the following search methods<strong>to</strong> compile the bibliography:• Sent requests for information <strong>to</strong> relevantlistservs, e.g., COMFOOD, the NationalNeighborhood Indica<strong>to</strong>rs Partnership(NNIP), American Evaluation Association(EVALTALK), and agency email lists;• Wrote <strong>to</strong> 80 food policy councils acrossthe country that are listed on the NorthAmerican <strong>Food</strong> Policy Council websiteand the Community <strong>Food</strong> SecurityCoalition <strong>Food</strong> Policy Council Database;• Contacted several foundations andleaders working in the food access field;• Searched PubMed and other librarydatabases related <strong>to</strong> the fields ofplanning, community development, andgeography <strong>to</strong> identify formally publishedwork related <strong>to</strong> urban and rural foodaccess and health implications; and• Reviewed reference lists of included studies.In order <strong>to</strong> be included, each study needed<strong>to</strong> meet the following criteria:• Related directly or indirectly <strong>to</strong> identifyingdisparities in access <strong>to</strong> food retailersor healthy food, and the relationshipbetween food retail and health;• Either included original research onthese <strong>to</strong>pics or reviewed other studies;• Conducted in the United States (while therehave been studies conducted outside ofthe United States, the persistent trend ofresidential segregation by race/ethnicity andincome in this country makes extrapolationfrom these studies of limited value); and• Published during or after 1995 (althoughwe included a few important studies thatwere conducted between 1990 and 1994).One hundred and thirty-two studies were ultimatelyincluded in the database, of 168 articles initiallygathered through the search methods above. Weincluded studies that use random and nonrandomsampling methods and quantitative and qualitativetechniques (such as resident interviews). We alsoincluded studies that examine single communities ofinterest (alone or in comparison <strong>to</strong> other areas). Weexcluded newsletters, policy statements, and studiesthat focused on methods and measurements. Inone case we found two policy papers, one shorterthan the other, based on the same study and data;they were counted as one study in the database.Of the studies selected for the database, 61 werepublished in peer-reviewed journals, and 71 fellin<strong>to</strong> the grey literature category. We did notsystematically review the evidence quality (e.g.,sample size, strength of methods used) of each23


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>study for this review, but note that <strong>to</strong> date, thestudies that examine the health impacts of access<strong>to</strong> healthy food have primarily used cross-sectionalresearch designs (examining survey data) and therehave been few longitudinal or intervention studies.We also noted some systematic differencesbetween the content of the peer-reviewed studiescompared <strong>to</strong> those conducted by practitioners.None of the practitioner studies examined therelationship between food access and eatingbehaviors, likely due <strong>to</strong> the difficulty of accessingdata on eating behaviors for small geographies orindividuals. Only one of the peer-reviewed studiesexamined the economic impacts of grocery s<strong>to</strong>res.24


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>ReferencesPeer-Reviewed Journal ArticlesAlwitt, L., and Donley, T. “Retail S<strong>to</strong>res inPoor Urban Neighborhoods.” Journal ofConsumer Affairs 31 (1997): 139–164.Andrews, M., Kan<strong>to</strong>r, L., Lino, M., andRipplinger, D. “Using USDA’s Thrifty <strong>Food</strong> Plan<strong>to</strong> Assess <strong>Food</strong> Availability and Affordability.”<strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> 24, no.2 (2001): 45-53.Andreyeva, T., Blumenthal, D., Schwartz, M.,Long, M., and Brownell, K. “Availability and Pricesof <strong>Food</strong>s Across S<strong>to</strong>res And Neighborhoods:<strong>The</strong> Case Of New Haven, Connecticut.” HealthAffairs 27, no.5 (2008): 1381–1388.Auchincloss, A., Diez-Roux, A., Brown, D.,Erdmann, C., Ber<strong>to</strong>ni, A. “NeighborhoodResources for Physical Activity and <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>sand <strong>The</strong>ir Association with Insulin Resistance.”Epidemiology, 19 (2008):146–157.Baker, E., Schootman, M., Barnidge, E., andKelly, C. “<strong>The</strong> Role of Race and Poverty in <strong>Access</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong>s that Enable Individuals <strong>to</strong> Adhere <strong>to</strong>Dietary Guidelines.” Preventing Chronic Disease:Public Health Research, Practice and Policy 3,no. 3 (2006): 1-11. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0217.htm.Beaulac, J., Kristjansson, E., and Cummins, S.“A Systematic Review of <strong>Food</strong> Deserts, 1966-2007.” Preventing Chronic Disease: PublicHealth Research, Practice and Policy 6, no.3 (2009): 1-10. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2009/Jul/08_0163.htm.Block, D., and Kouba, J. “A Comparison of theAvailability and Affordability of a Market Basketin Two Communities in the Chicago Area.” PublicHealth Nutrition 9, no.7 (2006): 837–845.Bodor, J. N., Rose, D., Farley, T. A., Swalm,C., and Scott, S.K. “Neighbourhood Fruit andVegetable Availability and Consumption: <strong>The</strong> Roleof Small <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res in an Urban Environment.”Public Health Nutrition 11 (2008): 413-420.Caldwell E., Kobayashi, M., DuBow,W., and Wytinck, S. “Perceived <strong>Access</strong><strong>to</strong> Fruits and Vegetables Associatedwith Increased Consumption.” PublicHealth Nutrition (2008): 1743-50.Cheadle A., Psaty, B., Curry, S., Wagner, E., Diehr,P., Koepsell, T., and Kristal, A. “Community-Level Comparisons Between <strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>reEnvironment and Individual Dietary Practices.”Preventive Medicine 20, no.2 (1991): 250-61.Clif<strong>to</strong>n, K. “Mobility Strategies and <strong>Food</strong>Shopping for Low-Income Families: A CaseStudy.” Journal of Planning Educationand Research 23 (2004): 402-413.Cotterill, R., and Franklin, A. “<strong>The</strong> Urban<strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re <strong>Gap</strong>.” <strong>Food</strong> Marketing PolicyCenter, University of Connecticut. <strong>Food</strong>Marketing Policy Issue Paper 8 (1995).Fisher, B., and Strogatz, D. “Community Measuresof Low-Fat Milk Consumption: Comparing S<strong>to</strong>reShelves with Households.” American Journalof Public Health 89, no.2 (1999): 235–237.Franco, M., Roux, A., Glass, T., Caballero, B.,and Brancati, F. “Neighborhood Characteristicsand Availability of <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>s inBaltimore.” American Journal of PreventiveMedicine 35, no.6 (2008): 561–567.Galvez, M., Morland, K., Raines, C., etal. “Race and <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Availability inan Inner-City Neighbourhood.” PublicHealth Nutrition 11 (2007): 624–631.Giang, T., Karpyn, A., Laurison, H., Hillier, A.,Bur<strong>to</strong>n, M., and Perry, D. “Closing the <strong>Grocery</strong><strong>Gap</strong> in Underserved Communities: <strong>The</strong> Creationof the Pennsylvania Fresh <strong>Food</strong> FinancingInitiative.” Journal of Public Health Managementand Practice 14, no.3 (2008): 272-279.25


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Gittelsohn, J., Franceschini, M., Rasooly, I., Ries, A.,Ho, L., Pavlovich, W., San<strong>to</strong>s, V., Jennings, S., andFrick, K. “Understanding the <strong>Food</strong> Environmentin a Low-Income Urban Setting: Implications for<strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Interventions.” Journal of Hunger &Environmental Nutrition 2, no.2 (2008): 33-50.Glanz, K., Sallis, J., Saelens, B., and Frank,L. “Nutrition Environment Measures Surveyin S<strong>to</strong>res (NEMS-S) Development andEvaluation.” American Journal of PreventiveMedicine 32, no.4 (2007): 282-289.Helling, A., and Sawicki, D. “Race and Residential<strong>Access</strong>ibility <strong>to</strong> Shopping and Services.” HousingPolicy Debate 14, no.1 (2003): 69-101.Horowitz, C., Colson, K., Hebert, P., andLancaster K. “Barriers <strong>to</strong> Buying <strong>Healthy</strong><strong>Food</strong>s for People with Diabetes: Evidence ofEnvironmental Disparities.” American Journalof Public Health 94 (2004): 1549–1554.Hosler, A., Rajulu, D., Fredrick, B., and Ronsani,A. “Assessing Retail Fruit and VegetableAvailability in Urban and Rural UnderservedCommunities.” Preventing Chronic Disease5, no.4 (2008): 1-9. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/oct/07_0169.htm.Hosler, A., Varadarajulu, D., Ronsani, A., Fredrick,B., and Fisher, B. “Low-Fat Milk and High-FiberBread Availability in <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res in Urban andRural Communities.” Journal of Public HealthManagement Practice 12 (2006): 556–562.Inagami, S., Cohen, D., Finch K. B., and Asch, S.“You are Where You Shop: <strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Locations,Weight, and Neighborhoods.” American Journalof Preventive Medicine 31, no.1 (2006): 10-17.Jago, R., Baranowski, T., Baranowski, J.,Cullen, K., and Thompson, D. “Distance <strong>to</strong><strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res and Adolescent Male Fruit andVegetable Consumption: Mediation Effects.”International Journal of Behavioral Nutritionand Physical Activity 4 (2007): 4-35. Availableat http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/4/1/35.Jetter, K., and Cassady, D. “<strong>The</strong> Availability andCost of Healthier <strong>Food</strong> Alternatives.” AmericanJournal of Preventive Medicine 30 (2006): 38–44.Kaufman, P. “Rural Poor Have Less <strong>Access</strong><strong>to</strong> Supermarkets, Large <strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res.”Rural Development Perspectives 13 (1998):19–26. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/rdp/rdp1098/rdp1098c.pdf.Laraia, B., Siega-Riz, A., Kaufman, J. and Jones, S.“Proximity of Supermarkets Is Positively Associatedwith Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy.” AmericanJournal of Preventive Medicine 39 (2004): 869–875.Larson, N., S<strong>to</strong>ry, M., and Nelson, M.“Neighborhood Environments Disparities in <strong>Access</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>s in the U.S.” American Journal ofPreventative Medicine 36, no.1 (2009): 74-81.Lavin, M. “Supermarket <strong>Access</strong> and ConsumerWell-Being: <strong>The</strong> Case of Pathmark in Harlem.”International Journal of Retail and DistributionManagement 33, no.5 (2005): 388-398.Liese, A., Weis, K., Plu<strong>to</strong>, D., Smith, E., and Lawson,A. “<strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Types, Availability, and Cost of <strong>Food</strong>sin a Rural Environment.” Journal of the AmericanDietetic Association 107 (2007): 1916–1923.Liu, G., Wilson, J., Qi, R., and Ying, J. “GreenNeighborhoods, <strong>Food</strong> Retail and ChildhoodOverweight: Differences by PopulationDensity.” American Journal of HealthPromotion 21, no.4 (2007): 317-325.Moore, L., and Roux, A. “Associations ofNeighborhood Characteristics with the Locationand Type of <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res.” American Journalof Public Health 96 (2006): 325–331.Moore, L., Roux, A., and Brines, S. “ComparingPerception-Based and Geographic InformationSystem (GIS)-Based Characterizations ofthe Local <strong>Food</strong> Environment.” Journal ofUrban Health: Bulletin of the New YorkAcademy of Medicine 85, no.2 (2008).Moore, L., Roux, A., Nettle<strong>to</strong>n, J., andJacobs, D. “Associations of the Local <strong>Food</strong>Environment with Diet Quality—A Comparison ofAssessments Based on Surveys and GeographicInformation Systems: <strong>The</strong> Multi-Ethnic Studyof Atherosclerosis.” American Journal ofEpidemiology 167 (2008): 917–924.Morland, K., and Filomena, S. “Disparities in theAvailability of Fruits and Vegetables BetweenRacially Segregated Urban Neighbourhoods.” PublicHealth Nutrition 10, no.12 (2007): 1481-1489.Morland, K., Roux, A., and Wing, S. “Supermarkets,Other <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res, and Obesity: <strong>The</strong> Atherosclerosis26


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Risk in Communities Study.” American Journal ofPreventive Medicine 30, no.4 (2006): 333-339.Morland, K., and Evenson, K. “ObesityPrevalence and the Local <strong>Food</strong> Environment.”Health & Place 15, no.2 (2009): 491-495.Morland, K., Wing, S., Roux, A., and Poole,C. “Neighborhood Characteristics Associatedwith the Location of <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res and<strong>Food</strong> Service Places.” American Journal ofPreventive Medicine 22 (2002): 23–29.Morland, K., Wing, S., and Roux, A. “<strong>The</strong>Contextual Effect of the Local <strong>Food</strong> Environmen<strong>to</strong>n Residents’ Diets: <strong>The</strong> Atherosclerosis Riskin Communities Study.” American Journal ofPublic Health 92, no.11 (2002): 1761-67.Mor<strong>to</strong>n, L., and Blanchard, T. “Starved for<strong>Access</strong>: Life in Rural America’s <strong>Food</strong> Deserts.”Rural Realities 1, no.4 (2007). Available at www.ruralsociology.org/pubs/ruralrealities/issue4.html.Nayga, M., and Weinberg, Z. “Supermarket<strong>Access</strong> in the Inner Cities.” Journal of Retailingand Consumer Services 6, no.3 (1999): 141-145.Powell, L., Auld, C., Chaloupka, F., O’Malley,P. M., and Johns<strong>to</strong>n, L. D. “AssociationsBetween <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res and AdolescentBody Mass Index,” American Journal ofPreventive Medicine 33, no.4 (2007).Powell, L., Slater, S., Mirtcheva, D., Bao, Y.,and Chaloupka, F. “<strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Availabilityand Neighborhood Characteristics inthe United States.” American Journal ofPreventive Medicine 44 (2007): 189–195.Raja, S., Ma, C., and Yadav, P. “Beyond<strong>Food</strong> Deserts: Measuring and MappingRacial Disparities in Neighborhood <strong>Food</strong>Environments.” Journal of Planning Educationand Research 27 (2008): 469-482.Rose, D., and Richards, R. “<strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re <strong>Access</strong>and Household Fruit and Vegetable Use amongParticipants in the US <strong>Food</strong> Stamp Program.” PublicHealth Nutrition 7, no. 8 (2004): 1081-1088.Rundle, A., Neckerman, K., Freeman, L.,Lovasi, G., Purciel, M., Quinn, J., Richards,C., Sircar, N., and Weiss, C. “Neighborhood<strong>Food</strong> Environment and Walkability PredictObesity in New York City.” EnvironmentalHealth Perspectives 117 (2009): 442–447.Sekhobo, J., and Berney, B. “<strong>The</strong> Relation ofCommunity Occupational Structure and Prevalenceof Obesity in New York City Neighborhoods—An Ecological Analysis.” Journal of Hunger &Environmental Nutrition 3, no.1 (2008): 76-83.Sharkey J., and Horel, S. “NeighborhoodSocioeconomic Deprivation and MinorityComposition are Associated with BetterPotential Spatial <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> the Ground-Truthed<strong>Food</strong> Environment in a Large Rural Area.” <strong>The</strong>Journal of Nutrition 138 (2008): 620–627.Sharkey, J., Scott, H., Daikwon, H., and Huber,J. “Association Between NeighborhoodNeed and Spatial <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res andFast <strong>Food</strong> Restaurants in Neighborhoods ofColonias.” International Journal of HealthGeographics 8, no.9 (2009): 1-17.Short, A., Guthman, J., and Raskin, S. “<strong>Food</strong>Deserts, Oases, or Mirages? Small Marketsand Community <strong>Food</strong> Security in the SanFrancisco Bay Area.” Journal of PlanningEducation and Research 26 (2007): 352.Sloane, D., Diamount, A., Lewis, L, et al.“Improving the Nutritional Resource Environmentfor <strong>Healthy</strong> Living Through Community-BasedParticipa<strong>to</strong>ry Research.” <strong>The</strong> Journal of GeneralInternal Medicine 18 (2003): 568–575.Small, M. L., and McDermott, M. “<strong>The</strong>Presence of Organizational Resources inPoor Urban Neighborhoods: An Analysisof Average and Contextual effects.”Social Forces 84 (2006): 1697-1724.Sturm, R. “Disparities in the <strong>Food</strong>Environment Surrounding U.S. Middleand High Schools.” American Journal ofPublic Health 122 (2008): 681–690.Sturm, R., and Datar, A. “Body Mass Index inElementary School Children, Metropolitan Area<strong>Food</strong> Prices and <strong>Food</strong> Outlet Density.” Journalof Public Health 119 (2005): 1059–1068.Wang, M., Kim, S., Gonzalez, A., MacLeod,K., and Winkleby, M. “Socioeconomic and<strong>Food</strong>-Related Physical Characteristics of theNeighborhood Environment are Associated withBody Mass Index.” Journal of Epidemiologyand Community Health 61 (2007): 491–498.Zenk, S., and Powell, L. “U.S. Secondary Schools and<strong>Food</strong> Outlets.” Health & Place, 14 (2008): 336–346.27


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Zenk, S. H., Schulz, A., Hollis-Neely, T., Campbell, R.T., Watkins, G., Nwankwo, R., and Odoms-Yound,A. “Fruit and Vegetable Intake in African AmericansIncome and S<strong>to</strong>re Characteristics.” AmericanJournal of Preventive Medicine 20, no.1 (2005).Zenk, S., Schulz, A., Israel, B., James, S., Bao, S.,and Wilson, M. “Neighborhood Racial Composition,Neighborhood Poverty, and the Spatial <strong>Access</strong>ibilityof Supermarkets in Metropolitan Detroit.” AmericanJournal of Public Health 95 (2005): 660–667.Zenk, S., Schulz, A., Israel, B., Sherman, J., Bao,S., and Wilson, M. “Fruit and Vegetable <strong>Access</strong>Differs by Community Racial Composition andSocioeconomic Position in Detroit, Michigan.”Ethnicity & Disease 16 (2006): 75-280.Grey LiteratureAlameda Point Collaborative, Alameda PointCollaborative <strong>Food</strong> Security Findings andRecommendations. Alameda, CA: Alameda PointCollaborative, 2006. Available at http://www.apcollaborative.org/images/APC_GrowingYouth.pdf.Alberti, P., Hadi, E., Cespedes, A., Grimshaw,V., and Bedell, J. Farmers’ Markets—BringingFresh, Nutritious <strong>Food</strong> <strong>to</strong> the South Bronx.New York, NY: New York City Department ofHealth and Mental Hygiene, 2008. Available athttp://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/doh/downloads/pdf/dpho/dpho-farmersmarket.pdf.Beatley, T., et al. <strong>The</strong> Charlottesville Region<strong>Food</strong> System: A Preliminary Assessment.Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia,2006. Available at http://www.virginia.edu/ien/docs/06FINALRept_Jun06_Cville<strong>Food</strong>.pdf.Birnbach, K. <strong>Food</strong> for Thought. <strong>Access</strong> andAvailability of Health <strong>Food</strong> in East Austin. Austin,TX: University of Texas at Austin, 2008.Bjorn, A., Lee, B., Born, B., Monsivais, P., Kan<strong>to</strong>r,S., Sayre, R. At the Table with the AFPC. Mapping<strong>Food</strong> Insecurity and <strong>Access</strong> in Seattle and KingCounty Issue. Seattle, WA: Seattle and KingCounty Acting <strong>Food</strong> Policy Council, 2008.Blanchard, T., and Lyson, T. “<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> LowCost Groceries in Nonmetropolitan Counties:Large Retailers and the Creation of <strong>Food</strong>Deserts.” Mississippi, MS: Southern RuralDevelopment Center, 2006. Available at http://srdc.msstate.edu/measuring/blanchard.pdf.Blanchard, T., and Lyson, T. “<strong>Food</strong> Availability &<strong>Food</strong> Deserts in the Nonmetropolitan South.”Mississippi, MS: Southern Rural DevelopmentCenter, 2006. Available at http://srdc.msstate.edu/focusareas/health/fa/fa_12_blanchard.pdf.Blanchard, T., and Lyson, T. “Retail Concentration,<strong>Food</strong> Deserts, and <strong>Food</strong> DisadvantagedCommunities in Rural America.” Mississippi,MS: Southern Rural Development Center,2009. Available at http://srdc.msstate.edu/focusareas/health/fa/blanchard02_final.pdf.California Center for Public Health Advocacy.Searching for <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> Landscape inCalifornia Cities and Counties. Davis, CA: CaliforniaCenter for Public Health Advocacy, 2007.California Center for Public Health Advocacy,PolicyLink, and the UCLA Center for HealthPolicy Research. Designed for Disease: <strong>The</strong> LinkBetween Local <strong>Food</strong> Environments and Obesity andDiabetes. Davis, CA: California Center for PublicHealth Advocacy, 2008. Available at http://www.policylink.org/documents/DesignedforDisease.pdf.Chen, S., Raymond, F., and Snyder, S. “Obesity inUrban <strong>Food</strong> Markets: Evidence from GeoreferencedMicro Data.” West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University,2009. Available at http://www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/chen_et_al_revised.pdf.City Harvest. Mount Hope Community <strong>Food</strong>Assessment Report. New York, NY: City Harvest,2009. Available at http://www.cityharvest.org/images/pdf/Mount_Hope_CFA.pdf.City Harvest. <strong>The</strong> Melrose Community <strong>Food</strong>Assessment. New York, NY: City Harvest,2009. Available at http://www.cityharvest.org/images/pdf/Melrose_CFA_2007.pdf.Community Farm Alliance. Bridging theDivide. Growing Self-Sufficiency in Our<strong>Food</strong> Supply: Community <strong>Food</strong> Assessment.A Regional Approach for <strong>Food</strong> Systems inLouisville KY. Frankfort, KY: Community FarmAlliance, 2007. Available at http://www.communityfarmalliance.org/Bridging<strong>The</strong>Divide.pdf.Community Health Councils Inc. Does RaceDefine What’s in the Shopping Cart? CommunityHealth and Education. Los Angeles, CA:Community Health Councils Inc., 2008.28


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>D.C. Hunger Solutions. <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>, <strong>Healthy</strong>Communities: An Assessment and Scorecardof Community <strong>Food</strong> Security In the Distric<strong>to</strong>f Columbia. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: D.C. HungerSolutions, 2006. Available at http://www.dchunger.org/pdf/healthfoodcomm.pdf.Fresno Metro Ministry. Fresno Fresh <strong>Access</strong>:Community <strong>Food</strong> Assessment Report. 2003-2005. Fresno, CA: Fresno Metro Ministry,2005. Available at http://fresnometmin.org/fmm/pdfs/CFA_Summary_9-14-05.pdf.Frontier Nutrition Project. Trinity County<strong>Food</strong> Security Assessment. Weaverville,CA: Frontier Nutrition Project, 2001.Available at http://www.foodsecurity.org/cfa/trinity_cty_food_assessment.pdf.Fulfrost, B. Mapping the Markets: <strong>The</strong> RelativeDensity of Retail <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res in Densely PopulatedCensus Blocks in the Central Coast Region ofCalifornia. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California,Santa Cruz, 2006. Available at http://casfs.ucsc.edu/research/Mapping<strong>The</strong>Markets.pdf.Gallagher, M. <strong>The</strong> Chicago <strong>Food</strong> Desert Report.Chicago, IL: Mari Gallagher Research and ConsultingGroup, 2009. Available at www.marigallagher.com.Gallagher, M. Examining the Impact of <strong>Food</strong>Deserts on Public Health in Chicago. Chicago,IL: Mari Gallagher Research and ConsultingGroup, 2006. Available at http://www.marigallagher.com/site_media/dynamic/project_files/1_Chicago<strong>Food</strong>DesertReport-Full_.pdf.Gallagher, M. Examining the Impact of <strong>Food</strong>Deserts on Public Health in Detroit. Chicago,IL: Mari Gallagher Research and ConsultingGroup, 2007. Available at http://www.marigallagher.com/site_media/dynamic/project_files/1_Detroit<strong>Food</strong>DesertReport_Full.pdf.Goldstein, I., Loethen, L., Kako, E., andCalifano, C. CDFI Financing of Supermarketsin Underserved Communities: A Case Study.Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> Reinvestment Fund, 2008.Available at http://www.trfund.com/resource/downloads/policypubs/CDFIStudySummary.pdf.Gordon, C., Ghai, N., Purciel, M., Talwalkar, A., andGoodman, A. Eating Well in Harlem: How AvailableIs <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>? New York, NY: New York CityDepartment of Health and Mental Hygiene, 2007.Graham, R., Kaufman, L., Novoa, Z., and Karpati,A. Eating In, Eating Out, Eating Well: <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong><strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong> in North and Central Brooklyn.New York, NY: New York City Departmen<strong>to</strong>f Health and Mental Hygiene, 2006.Hartford <strong>Food</strong> System. Connecticut’sSupermarkets: Can New Strategies Addressthe Geographic <strong>Gap</strong>s? Hartford, CT: Hartford<strong>Food</strong> System, 2006. Available at http://www.hartfordfood.org/pubs/supermarkets.pdf.Hatfield, D., and Gunnell, A. <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong>in California Today. Portland, OR: Ecotrust,2005. Available at http://www.vividpicture.net/documents/12_<strong>Food</strong>_<strong>Access</strong>_in_CA_Today.pdf.Hrisanti, A., Chong, T., Dang, J., et al. <strong>The</strong>East Baltimore Nutritional Environment:Formative Research with Community Leaders.Baltimore, MD: <strong>Healthy</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res Project, 2003.Available at http://www.healthys<strong>to</strong>res.org/images/downloads/eastbalt.pdf.Hunger Task Force of Milwaukee. Hunger inMilwaukee, Some <strong>Food</strong> for Thought. Milwaukee,WI: Hunger Task Force of Milwaukee, 2002.Available at http://www.hungertaskforce.org/userimages/publications_foodforthought_report.pdf.Kaiser, C. <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in Minneapolis:Initial Conversations with Residents. Minneapolis,MN: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy,2009. Available at http://www.iatp.org/iatp/publications.cfm?accountID=258&refID=104952.Kaufman, L., and Karpati, A. <strong>Food</strong> Matters: WhatBushwick Families’ <strong>Food</strong> Habits Teach Us aboutChildhood Obesity. New York, NY: New York CityDepartment of Health and Mental Hygiene, 2007.King, R., Leibtag, E., and Behl, A. “SupermarketCharacteristics and Operating Costs In Low-Income Areas,” Agricultural Economics Reports.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: United States Department ofAgriculture, Economic Research Service, 2004.Lopez, R. Community <strong>Food</strong> Security in Connecticut:An Evaluation and Ranking of 169 Towns. S<strong>to</strong>rrs,CT: Hartford <strong>Food</strong> System, 2005. Available at http://www.hartfordfood.org/pubs/cfs_connecticut.pdf.Manjarrez, C., and Cigna, J. <strong>Food</strong> StampParticipation and Market <strong>Access</strong> in the District ofColumbia. Discussion Brief No. 3. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC:Urban Institute, 2006. Available at http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311343_dcfoodstamp.pdf.Mor<strong>to</strong>n, L., Oakland, J., Bit<strong>to</strong>, E., Sand, M., andMichaels, B. Iowa Community <strong>Food</strong> Assessment29


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Project Report 2001-02. Ames, IA: Iowa StateUniversity Family Nutrition Program, 2002. Availableat http://www.soc.iastate.edu/extension/pub/tech/IowaCommunity<strong>Food</strong>AssessmentReport.pdf.Neckerman, K., Bader, M., Purciel, M., andYousefzadeh, P. “Measuring <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in UrbanAreas.” New York, NY: Columbia University,2009. Available at http://www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/neckerman_et_al.pdf.New Mexico <strong>Food</strong> and Agriculture Policy Council.Closing New Mexico’s Rural <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Gap</strong>. SantaFe, NM: New Mexico <strong>Food</strong> and AgriculturePolicy Council, 2006. Available at http://www.farm<strong>to</strong>tablenm.org/closing_nm_food_gap_4pgs.pdf.New York City Department of City Planning.Going <strong>to</strong> Market: New York City’s Neighborhood<strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re and Supermarket Shortage. NewYork, NY, 2008. Available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/supermarket/index.shtml.Papavasiliou, F., Essig, C., Barlett, P., and Rolls, A.Is <strong>Healthy</strong> Eating Possible in DeKalb County? AnAssessment of <strong>Food</strong> Availability, <strong>Access</strong>, and Cost inTwo Neighborhoods. Atlanta Local <strong>Food</strong> Initiative.Decatur, GA: DeKalb County Board of Health, 2007.Rose, D., Bodor, N., Swalm, C., Rice, J., Farley,T., and Hutchinson, P. Deserts in New Orleans?Illustrations of Urban <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> and Implicationsfor Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of MichiganNational Poverty Center/USDA Economic ResearchService, 2009. Available at http://www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/rose_et_al.pdf.Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Hunger Coalition. <strong>The</strong> Avondale/GlenElder Community <strong>Food</strong> Assessment. <strong>Food</strong> Securityin a South Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Neighborhood. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>,CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Hunger Coalition, 2004.San Francisco <strong>Food</strong> Alliance. 2005 San FranciscoCollaborative <strong>Food</strong> System Assessment.San Francisco, CA: San Francisco <strong>Food</strong>Alliance, 2005. Available at http://www.sffoodsystems.org/pdf/FSA-online.pdf.Shaffer, A. <strong>The</strong> Persistence of L.A.’s <strong>Grocery</strong><strong>Gap</strong>: <strong>The</strong> Need for a New <strong>Food</strong> Policy andApproach <strong>to</strong> Market Development. Occidental,CA: Center for <strong>Food</strong> and Justice, 2002.Available at www.departments.oxy.edu/uepi/publications/the_persistence_of.htm.Sharkey, J., and Horel, S. “Characteristics ofPotential Spatial <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> a Variety of Fruitsand Vegetables in a Large Rural Area.” CollegeStation, TX: Texas A&M Health Science Center,2009. Available at http://www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/sharkey.pdf.Smith, D. <strong>Food</strong> Deserts in the Willamette: A Studyof <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in Lane County, Oregon. [Master’sthesis]. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, 2003.Social Compact Inc., Baltimore NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.Social Compact Inc., Cincinnati NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2007.Social Compact Inc., Detroit <strong>Grocery</strong> InitiativeCatalyzing <strong>Grocery</strong> Retail Investment inInner-City Neighborhoods. Washing<strong>to</strong>n,DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.Social Compact Inc., City of Fresno NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2009.Social Compact Inc., City of Tampa NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.Social Compact Inc., Harlem NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.Social Compact Inc., Hous<strong>to</strong>n NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2007.Social Compact Inc., Los Angeles NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.Social Compact Inc., Louisville MetroNeighborhood Market DrillDown. CatalyzingBusiness Investment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.Social Compact Inc., San Francisco NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.30


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Social Compact Inc., Southeast Fort WorthNeighborhood Market DrillDown. CatalyzingBusiness Investment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.Social Compact Inc., Washing<strong>to</strong>n DCNeighborhood Market DrillDown. CatalyzingBusiness Investment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.Southeast <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> Working Group. <strong>Food</strong>Preferences in San Francisco’s Southeast Sec<strong>to</strong>r: ASurvey Conducted by the Southeast <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong>Working Group. San Francisco, CA: Southeast<strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> Working Group, 2007. Availableat http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/shapeupsf/SEFASurveyReport-FINAL.pdf.Sparks, A., Bania, N., and Leete, L. “Finding<strong>Food</strong> Deserts: Methodology and Measuremen<strong>to</strong>f <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in Portland, Oregon.”Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: National Poverty Center andUSDA Economic Research Service, 2009.Sustainable <strong>Food</strong> Center. <strong>Access</strong> Denied. AnAnalysis of Problems Facing East Austin Residentsin <strong>The</strong>ir Attempts To Obtain Affordable, Nutritious<strong>Food</strong>. Austin, TX: Sustainable <strong>Food</strong> Center, 1995.Available at http://www.sustainablefoodcenter.org/library/<strong>Access</strong>_Denied.pdf.Tanaka, K., Mooney, P., et al. Lexing<strong>to</strong>nCommunity <strong>Food</strong> Assessment: 2004-2007.Lexing<strong>to</strong>n, KY: University of Kentucky, 2008.Available at http://www.uky.edu/Ag/CLD/doc/Community<strong>Food</strong>AssessmentReport04-07.pdf.Tchumtchoua, A. Town-Level Assessment ofCommunity <strong>Food</strong> Security in Connecticut. S<strong>to</strong>rrs, CT:<strong>Food</strong> Marketing Policy Center, 2005. Available athttp://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=fpmc_mono.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. Stimulating SupermarketDevelopment: A New Day for Philadelphia.Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>, 2004.Available at http://www.thefoodtrust.org/pdf/SupermktReport_F.pdf.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Need for More <strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res inNew York. Special Report. Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong><strong>Trust</strong>, 2008. Available at http://www.thefoodtrust.org/catalog/download.php?product_id=147.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Need for More Supermarketsin Chicago. Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>,2008. Available at http://www.thefoodtrust.org/catalog/download.php?product_id=147.<strong>The</strong> Reinvestment Fund. <strong>The</strong> EconomicImpacts of Supermarkets on their SurroundingCommunities, Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> ReinvestmentFund, 2008. http://www.trfund.com/resource/downloads/policypubs/supermarkets.pdf.Thurman, S. Measuring <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> inCharlottesville, VA. Charlottesville, VA: Universityof Virginia, 2007. Available at http://www.virginia.edu/ien/docs/07<strong>Food</strong>ClassFINAL%20PAPERS/<strong>Access</strong>Transportation.pdf.Tsai, S. Needs Assessment: <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> Nutritious<strong>Food</strong>s in East Oakland and South Hayward. [Master’s<strong>The</strong>sis]. Berkeley, CA: University of California atBerkeley School of Public Health and AlamedaCounty Public Health Department, 2003.Unger., S., and Wooten., H. A <strong>Food</strong> SystemsAssessment For Oakland, CA: Toward ASustainable <strong>Food</strong> Plan. [Master’s <strong>The</strong>sis]. Berkeley,CA: Oakland Mayor’s Office of Sustainabilityand University of California, Berkeley, 2006.Urban and Environmental Policy Institute.<strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in Central and South Los Angeles:Mapping Injustice, Agenda for Action. 2007:A Report on Project CAFE: Community Actionon <strong>Food</strong> Environments. Los Angeles, CA:Urban and Environmental Policy Institute2007. Available at http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/cfj/publications/project_cafe.pdf.USDA Economic Research Service. <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong>Affordable and Nutritious <strong>Food</strong>: Measuringand Understanding <strong>Food</strong> Deserts and <strong>The</strong>irConsequences. Report <strong>to</strong> Congress. Washing<strong>to</strong>n,DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture,2009. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AP/AP036/AP036.pdf.Williams, D. <strong>Food</strong> Security and <strong>Access</strong>in Akron Ohio. [Master’s <strong>The</strong>sis]. Akron,OH: University of Akron, 2002.31


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Notes1Martinez, S. “<strong>The</strong> U.S. <strong>Food</strong> Marketing System:Recent Developments, 1997-2006,” Washing<strong>to</strong>n,DC: United States Department of Agriculture,Economic Research Service, 2007. Availableat www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err42/.2Contact the authors for summaries of thestudy findings that can be sorted by place andsub<strong>to</strong>pic (e.g. race, income, eating behaviors).3Beaulac, J., Kristjansson, E., and Cummins, S.“A Systematic Review of <strong>Food</strong> Deserts, 1966-2007.” Preventing Chronic Disease: PublicHealth Research, Practice and Policy 6, no.3(2009): 1-10. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2009/Jul/08_0163.htm.4Larson, N., S<strong>to</strong>ry, M., and Nelson, M.“Neighborhood Environments Disparities in <strong>Access</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>s in the U.S.” American Journal ofPreventative Medicine 36, no.1 (2009): 74-81.5Nayga, M., and Weinberg, Z. “Supermarket<strong>Access</strong> in the Inner Cities.” Journal of Retailingand Consumer Services 6, no.3 (1999): 141-145.6One study interviewed Minneapolis residentsabout access <strong>to</strong> healthy food and found challenges,but did not examine differences according <strong>to</strong>their race, income, or neighborhood of residence.Kaiser, C. <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in Minneapolis:Initial Conversations with Residents, Minneapolis,MN: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy,2009. Available at http://www.iatp.org/iatp/publications.cfm?accountID=258&refID=104952.7Alameda Point Collaborative. Alameda PointCollaborative <strong>Food</strong> Security Findings andRecommendations. Alameda, CA: Alameda PointCollaborative, 2006. Available at http://www.apcollaborative.org/images/APC_GrowingYouth.pdf.8Alwitt, L., and Donley, T. “Retail S<strong>to</strong>res inPoor Urban Neighborhoods.” Journal ofConsumer Affairs 31 (1997):139–64.9Andreyeva, T., Blumenthal, D., Schwartz, M.,Long, M., and Brownell, K. “Availability andPrices of <strong>Food</strong>s Across S<strong>to</strong>res and Neighborhoods:<strong>The</strong> Case Of New Haven, Connecticut.” HealthAffairs 27, no.5 (2008): 1381–1388.10Baker, E., Schootman, M., Barnidge, E., andKelly, C. “<strong>The</strong> Role of Race and Poverty in <strong>Access</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong>s that Enable Individuals <strong>to</strong> Adhere <strong>to</strong>Dietary Guidelines.” Preventing Chronic Disease:Public Health Research, Practice and Policy 3,no.3 (2006): 1-11. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0217.htm.11Birnbach, K. <strong>Food</strong> for Thought. <strong>Access</strong> andAvailability of Health <strong>Food</strong> in East Austin. Austin,TX: University of Texas at Austin, 2008.12Bjorn, A., Lee, B., Born, B., Monsivais, P., Kan<strong>to</strong>r,S., and Sayre, R. At the Table with the AFPC.Mapping <strong>Food</strong> Insecurity and <strong>Access</strong> in Seattleand King County Issue. Seattle, WA: Seattle andKing County Acting <strong>Food</strong> Policy Council, 2008.13Bodor, J. N., Rose, D., Farley, T. A., Swalm,C., and Scott, S. K. “Neighbourhood Fruit andVegetable Availability and Consumption: <strong>The</strong> Roleof Small <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res in an Urban Environment.”Public Health Nutrition 11 (2008): 413-420.14California Center for Public Health Advocacy,PolicyLink, and the UCLA Center for HealthPolicy Research. Designed for Disease: <strong>The</strong> LinkBetween Local <strong>Food</strong> Environments and Obesity andDiabetes. Davis, CA: California Center for PublicHealth Advocacy, 2008. Available at http://www.policylink.org/documents/DesignedforDisease.pdf.15Chung, C., and Myers, J. “Do the Poor PayMore for <strong>Food</strong>? An Analysis of <strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>reAvailability and <strong>Food</strong> Price Disparities.” Journalof Consumer Affairs 33 (1999): 276–296.16Clif<strong>to</strong>n, K. “Mobility Strategies and <strong>Food</strong>Shopping for Low-Income Families: A CaseStudy.” Journal of Planning Educationand Research 23 (2004): 402-413.17Community Farm Alliance. Bridging theDivide. Growing Self-Sufficiency in our <strong>Food</strong>32


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>Supply: Community <strong>Food</strong> Assessment. ARegional Approach for <strong>Food</strong> Systems inLouisville KY. Frankfort, KY: Community FarmAlliance, 2007. Available at http://www.communityfarmalliance.org/Bridging<strong>The</strong>Divide.pdf.18Community Health Councils Inc. DoesRace Define What’s in the Shopping Cart?Community Health and Education. Los Angeles,CA: Community Health Councils Inc., 2008.19Cotterill, R., and Franklin, A. “<strong>The</strong> Urban<strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re <strong>Gap</strong>.” <strong>Food</strong> Marketing PolicyCenter, University of Connecticut. <strong>Food</strong>Marketing Policy Issue Paper 8 (1995).20D.C. Hunger Solutions. <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>, <strong>Healthy</strong>Communities: An Assessment and Scorecardof Community <strong>Food</strong> Security In the Distric<strong>to</strong>f Columbia. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: D.C. HungerSolutions, 2006. Available at http://www.dchunger.org/pdf/healthfoodcomm.pdf.21Fisher, B., and Strogatz, D. “Community Measuresof Low-Fat Milk Consumption: Comparing S<strong>to</strong>reShelves with Households.” American Journalof Public Health 89, no.2 (1999): 235–237.22Urban and Environmental Policy Institute. <strong>Food</strong><strong>Access</strong> in Central and South Los Angeles: MappingInjustice, Agenda for Action. A Report on ProjectCAFE: Community Action on <strong>Food</strong> Environments.Los Angeles, CA: Urban and Environmental PolicyInstitute, 2007. Available at http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/cfj/publications/project_cafe.pdf.23Franco, M., Roux, A., Glass, T., Caballero, B.,and Brancati, F. “Neighborhood Characteristicsand Availability of <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>s inBaltimore.” American Journal of PreventiveMedicine 35, no.6 (2008): 561–567.24Gallagher, M. Examining the Impact of <strong>Food</strong>Deserts on Public Health in Chicago. Chicago,IL: Mari Gallagher Research and ConsultingGroup, 2006. Available at http://www.marigallagher.com/site_media/dynamic/project_files/1_Chicago<strong>Food</strong>DesertReport-Full_.pdf.25Gallagher, M. <strong>The</strong> Chicago <strong>Food</strong> Desert Report.Chicago, IL: Mari Gallagher Research and ConsultingGroup, 2009. Available at www.marigallagher.com.26Galvez, M., Morland, K., Raines, C.,et al. “Race and <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Availabilityin an Inner-City Neighbourhood.” PublicHealth Nutrition 11 (2007): 624–631.27Giang, T., Karpyn, A., Laurison, H., Hillier, A.,Bur<strong>to</strong>n, M., and Perry, D. “Closing the <strong>Grocery</strong><strong>Gap</strong> in Underserved Communities: <strong>The</strong> Creationof the Pennsylvania Fresh <strong>Food</strong> FinancingInitiative.” Journal of Public Health Managementand Practice 14, no.3 (2008): 272-279.28Glanz, K., Sallis, J., Saelens, B., andFrank, L. “Nutrition Environment MeasuresSurvey in S<strong>to</strong>res (NEMS-S) Development andEvaluation.” American Journal of PreventiveMedicine 32, no. 4 (2007): 282-289.29Hartford <strong>Food</strong> System. Connecticut’sSupermarkets: Can New Strategies Addressthe Geographic <strong>Gap</strong>s? Hartford, CT: Hartford<strong>Food</strong> System, 2006. Available at http://www.hartfordfood.org/pubs/supermarkets.pdf.30Helling, A., and Sawicki, D. “Race and Residential<strong>Access</strong>ibility <strong>to</strong> Shopping and Services.” HousingPolicy Debate 14, no.1 (2003): 69-101.31Horowitz, C., Colson, K., Hebert, P., andLancaster, K. “Barriers <strong>to</strong> Buying <strong>Healthy</strong><strong>Food</strong>s for People with Diabetes: Evidence ofEnvironmental Disparities.” American Journalof Public Health 94 (2004): 1549–1554.32Hosler, A., Rajulu, D., Fredrick, B., and Ronsani,A. “Assessing Retail Fruit and VegetableAvailability in Urban and Rural UnderservedCommunities.” Preventing Chronic Disease5, no.4 (2008): 1-9. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/oct/07_0169.htm.33Hosler, A., Varadarajulu, D., Ronsani, A., Fredrick,B., and Fisher, B. “Low-Fat Milk and High-FiberBread Availability in <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res in Urban andRural Communities.” Journal of Public HealthManagement Practice 12 (2006): 556–562.34Inagami, S., Cohen, D., Finch K. B., and Asch, S.“You are Where you Shop: <strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Locations,Weight, and Neighborhoods.” American Journalof Preventive Medicine 31, no.1 (2006): 10-17.35Jetter, K., and Cassady, D. “<strong>The</strong> Availability andCost of Healthier <strong>Food</strong> Alternatives.” AmericanJournal of Preventive Medicine 30 (2006): 38–44.36Kaufman, P. “Rural Poor Have Less <strong>Access</strong><strong>to</strong> Supermarkets, Large <strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res.”Rural Development Perspectives 13 (1998):19–26. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/rdp/rdp1098/rdp1098c.pdf.33


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>37Manjarrez, C., and Cigna, J. <strong>Food</strong> StampParticipation and Market <strong>Access</strong> in the District ofColumbia. Discussion Brief No. 3. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC:Urban Institute, 2006. Available at http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311343_dcfoodstamp.pdf.38Moore, L., and Roux, A. “Associations ofNeighborhood Characteristics with the Locationand Type of <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res.” American Journalof Public Health 96 (2006): 325–331.39Moore, L., Roux, A., and Brines, S. “ComparingPerception-Based and Geographic InformationSystem (GIS)-Based Characterizations ofthe Local <strong>Food</strong> Environment.” Journal ofUrban Health: Bulletin of the New YorkAcademy of Medicine 85, no.2 (2008).40Morland, K., and Filomena, S. “Disparities inthe Availability of Fruits and Vegetables BetweenRacially Segregated Urban Neighbourhoods.” PublicHealth Nutrition 10, no.12 (2007): 1481-1489.41Morland, K., Wing, S., Roux, A., andPoole, C. “Neighborhood CharacteristicsAssociated with the Location of <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>resand <strong>Food</strong> Service Places.” American Journalof Preventive Medicine 22 (2002): 23–29.42Morland, K., Wing, S., and Roux, A. “<strong>The</strong>Contextual Effect of the Local <strong>Food</strong> Environmen<strong>to</strong>n Residents’ Diets: <strong>The</strong> Atherosclerosis Riskin Communities Study.” American Journal ofPublic Health 92, no.11 (2002): 1761-1767.43Mor<strong>to</strong>n, L., and Blanchard, T. “Starved for<strong>Access</strong>: Life in Rural America’s <strong>Food</strong> Deserts.”Rural Realities 1, no.4 (2007). Available at www.ruralsociology.org/pubs/ruralrealities/issue4.html.44Neckerman, K., Bader, M., Purciel, M., andYousefzadeh, P. Measuring <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in UrbanAreas. New York, NY: Columbia University, 2009.Available at http://www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/neckerman_et_al.pdf.45Powell, L., Auld, C., Chaloupka, F., O’Malley,P. M., and Johns<strong>to</strong>n, L. D. “AssociationsBetween <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res and AdolescentBody Mass Index,” American Journal ofPreventive Medicine 33, no.4 (2007).46Powell, L., Slater, S., Mirtcheva, D., Bao, Y.,and Chaloupka, F. “<strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Availabilityand Neighborhood Characteristics inthe United States.” American Journal ofPreventive Medicine 44 (2007): 189–195.47Rundle, A., Neckerman, K., Freeman, L.,Lovasi, G., Purciel, M., Quinn, J., Richards,C., Sircar, N., and Weiss, C. “Neighborhood<strong>Food</strong> Environment and Walkability PredictObesity in New York City.” EnvironmentalHealth Perspectives 117 (2009): 442–447.48Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Hunger Coalition. <strong>The</strong> Avondale/GlenElder Community <strong>Food</strong> Assessment. <strong>Food</strong> Securityin a South Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Neighborhood. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>,CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Hunger Coalition, 2004.49Shaffer, A. <strong>The</strong> Persistence of L.A.’s <strong>Grocery</strong> <strong>Gap</strong>:<strong>The</strong> Need for a New <strong>Food</strong> Policy and Approach <strong>to</strong>Market Development. Center for <strong>Food</strong> and Justice,Urban and Environmental Policy Institute, OccidentalCollege. 2002. Available at www.departments.oxy.edu/uepi/publications/the_persistence_of.htm.50Sharkey, J., and Horel, S. “NeighborhoodSocioeconomic Deprivation and MinorityComposition are Associated with BetterPotential Spatial <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> the Ground-Truthed<strong>Food</strong> Environment in a Large Rural Area.” <strong>The</strong>Journal of Nutrition 138 (2008): 620–627.51Sharkey, J., Scott, H., Daikwon, H., andHuber, J. “Association Between NeighborhoodNeed and Spatial <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res andFast <strong>Food</strong> Restaurants in Neighborhoods ofColonias.” International Journal of HealthGeographics 8, no.9 (2009): 1-17.52Sloane, D., Diamount, A., Lewis, L., et al.“Improving the Nutritional Resource Environmentfor <strong>Healthy</strong> Living Through Community-BasedParticipa<strong>to</strong>ry Research.” <strong>The</strong> Journal of GeneralInternal Medicine 18 (2003): 568–575.53Small, M. L, and McDermott, M. “<strong>The</strong> Presenceof Organizational Resources in Poor UrbanNeighborhoods: An Analysis of Average andContextual effects.” Social Forces 84 (2006):1697-1724.54Smith, D. <strong>Food</strong> Deserts in the Willamette: A Studyof <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in Lane County, Oregon. [Master’sthesis]. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, 2003.55Sparks, A., Bania, N., and Leete, L. “Finding<strong>Food</strong> Deserts: Methodology and Measuremen<strong>to</strong>f <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> in Portland, Oregon.” Paperprepared for Institute of Medicine, Workshopon the Public Health Effects of <strong>Food</strong> Deserts,January 26, 2009. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC, 2009.34


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>56Social Compact Inc. Baltimore NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.57Social Compact Inc. Cincinnati NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2007.58Social Compact Inc. Detroit <strong>Grocery</strong>Initiative Catalyzing <strong>Grocery</strong> Retail Investmentin Inner-City Neighborhoods. Washing<strong>to</strong>n,DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.59Social Compact Inc. City of FresnoNeighborhood Market DrillDown. CatalyzingBusiness Investment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2009.60Social Compact Inc. City of TampaNeighborhood Market DrillDown. CatalyzingBusiness Investment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.61Social Compact Inc. Harlem NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.62Social Compact Inc. Hous<strong>to</strong>n NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2007.63Social Compact Inc. Los Angeles NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.64Social Compact Inc. Louisville MetroNeighborhood Market DrillDown. CatalyzingBusiness Investment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.65Social Compact Inc. San Francisco NeighborhoodMarket DrillDown. Catalyzing BusinessInvestment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.66Social Compact Inc. Southeast Fort WorthNeighborhood Market DrillDown. CatalyzingBusiness Investment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.67Social Compact Inc. Washing<strong>to</strong>n DCNeighborhood Market DrillDown. CatalyzingBusiness Investment in Inner-City Neighborhoods.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social Compact Inc., 2008.68Sustainable <strong>Food</strong> Center. <strong>Access</strong> Denied. AnAnalysis of Problems Facing East Austin Residentsin <strong>The</strong>ir Attempts To Obtain Affordable, Nutritious<strong>Food</strong>. Austin, TX: Sustainable <strong>Food</strong> Center, 1995.Available at http://www.sustainablefoodcenter.org/library/<strong>Access</strong>_Denied.pdf.69Tanaka, K., Mooney, P., et al. Lexing<strong>to</strong>nCommunity <strong>Food</strong> Assessment: 2004-2007.Lexing<strong>to</strong>n, KY: Department of Community &Leadership Development, University of Kentucky,2008. Available at http://www.uky.edu/Ag/CLD/doc/Community<strong>Food</strong>AssessmentReport04-07.pdf.70Tchumtchoua, A. Town-Level Assessmen<strong>to</strong>f Community <strong>Food</strong> Security in Connecticut.<strong>Food</strong> Marketing Policy Center. Universityof Connecticut, 2005. Available at http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=fpmc_mono.71<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. Stimulating SupermarketDevelopment: A New Day for Philadelphia.Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>, 2004.Available at http://www.thefoodtrust.org/pdf/SupermktReport_F.pdf.72<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Need for More<strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res in New York. Special Report.Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>, 2008.Available at http://www.thefoodtrust.org/catalog/download.php?product_id=147.73<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Need for More Supermarketsin Chicago. Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>,2008. Available at http://www.thefoodtrust.org/catalog/download.php?product_id=147.74University of Virginia School of Architecture,Department of Urban and EnvironmentalPlanning. <strong>The</strong> Charlottesville Region <strong>Food</strong>System: A Preliminary Assessment [StudentReport]. Charlottesville, VA: University ofVirginia School of Architecture, Departmen<strong>to</strong>f Urban and Environmental Planning., 2006.Available at http://www.virginia.edu/ien/docs/06FINALRept_Jun06_Cville<strong>Food</strong>.pdf.75Thurman, S. Measuring <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> inCharlottesville, VA. Charlottesville, VA: Universityof Virginia, 2007. Available at http://www.virginia.edu/ien/docs/07<strong>Food</strong>ClassFINAL%20PAPERS/<strong>Access</strong>Transportation.pdf.35


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>76Tsai, S. Needs Assessment: <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> Nutritious<strong>Food</strong>s in East Oakland and South Hayward. [Master’s<strong>The</strong>sis]. Berkeley, CA: University of California atBerkeley School of Public Health and AlamedaCounty Public Health Department, 2003.77Unger, S., and Wooten, H. A <strong>Food</strong> SystemsAssessment For Oakland, CA: Toward ASustainable <strong>Food</strong> Plan. [Master’s <strong>The</strong>sis]. Berkeley,CA: Oakland Mayor’s Office of Sustainabilityand University of California, Berkeley, 2006.78Wang, M., Kim, S., Gonzalez, A., MacLeod,K., and Winkleby, M. “Socioeconomic and<strong>Food</strong>-Related Physical Characteristics of theNeighborhood Environment are Associated withBody Mass Index.” Journal of Epidemiologyand Community Health 61 (2007): 491–498.79Zenk, S.H., Schulz, A. J., Hollis-Neely, T., Campbell,R.T., Watkins, G., Nwankwo, R., and Odoms-Yound,A. “Fruit and Vegetable Intake in African AmericansIncome and S<strong>to</strong>re Characteristics.” AmericanJournal of Preventive Medicine 20, no.1 (2005).80Zenk, S., Schulz, A., Israel, B., James, S., Bao, S.,and Wilson, M. “Neighborhood Racial Composition,Neighborhood Poverty, and the Spatial <strong>Access</strong>ibilityof Supermarkets in Metropolitan Detroit.” AmericanJournal of Public Health 95 (2005): 660–667.81Zenk, S., Schulz, A., Israel, B., Sherman, J., Bao,S., and Wilson, M. “Fruit and Vegetable <strong>Access</strong>Differs by Community Racial Composition andSocioeconomic Position in Detroit, Michigan.”Ethnicity & Disease 16 (2006): 275-280.82Fresno Metro Ministry. Fresno Fresh <strong>Access</strong>:Community <strong>Food</strong> Assessment Report. 2003-2005. Fresno, CA: Fresno Metro Ministry,2005. Available at http://fresnometmin.org/fmm/pdfs/CFA_Summary_9-14-05.pdf.83Kaufman, L., and Karpati, A. <strong>Food</strong> Matters: WhatBushwick Families’ <strong>Food</strong> Habits Teach us aboutChildhood Obesity. New York, NY: New York CityDepartment of Health and Mental Hygiene, 2007.84Fulfrost, B. Mapping the Markets: <strong>The</strong> RelativeDensity of Retail <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res in Densely PopulatedCensus Blocks in the Central Coast Region ofCalifornia. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California,Santa Cruz, 2006. Available at http://casfs.ucsc.edu/research/Mapping<strong>The</strong>Markets.pdf.85Williams, D. <strong>Food</strong> Security and <strong>Access</strong>in Akron Ohio. [Master’s <strong>The</strong>sis]. Akron,OH: University of Akron, 2002.86San Francisco <strong>Food</strong> Alliance. 2005 San FranciscoCollaborative <strong>Food</strong> System Assessment. SanFrancisco, CA: San Francisco <strong>Food</strong> Alliance, 2005.87California Center for Public Health Advocacy.Searching for <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> Landscape inCalifornia Cities and Counties. Davis, CA: CaliforniaCenter for Public Health Advocacy, 2007.88Andrews, M., Kan<strong>to</strong>r, L., Lino, M., andRipplinger, D. “Using USDA’s Thrifty <strong>Food</strong> Plan<strong>to</strong> Assess <strong>Food</strong> Availability and Affordability.”<strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> 24, no.2. (2001): 45-53.89Block, D., and Kouba, J. “A Comparison of theAvailability and Affordability of a Market Basketin Two Communities in the Chicago Area.” PublicHealth Nutrition 9, no.7 (2006): 837–845.90Lopez, R. Community <strong>Food</strong> Security inConnecticut: An Evaluation and Rankingof 169 Towns. S<strong>to</strong>rrs, CT: Hartford <strong>Food</strong>System, 2005. Available at http://www.hartfordfood.org/pubs/cfs_connecticut.pdf.91Moore L., Roux, A., Nettle<strong>to</strong>n, J., andJacobs, D. “Associations of the Local <strong>Food</strong>Environment with Diet Quality—A Comparison ofAssessments Based on Surveys and GeographicInformation Systems: <strong>The</strong> Multi-Ethnic Studyof Atherosclerosis.” American Journal ofEpidemiology 167 (2008): 917–924.92Raja, S., Ma, C., and Yadav, P. “Beyond<strong>Food</strong> Deserts: Measuring and MappingRacial Disparities in Neighborhood <strong>Food</strong>Environments.” Journal of Planning Educationand Research 27 (2008): 469-482.93Rose, D., Bodor, N., Swalm, C., Rice, J., Farley,T., and Hutchinson, P. Deserts in New Orleans?Illustrations of Urban <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong> and Implicationsfor Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of MichiganNational Poverty Center/USDA Economic ResearchService Research, 2009. Available at http://www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/rose_et_al.pdf.94Sekhobo, J., and Berney, B. “<strong>The</strong> Relation ofCommunity Occupational Structure and Prevalenceof Obesity in New York City Neighborhoods—An Ecological Analysis.” Journal of Hunger &Environmental Nutrition 3, no.1 (2008): 76-83.36


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>95USDA Economic Research Service. <strong>Access</strong><strong>to</strong> Affordable and Nutritious <strong>Food</strong>: Measuringand Understanding <strong>Food</strong> Deserts and <strong>The</strong>irConsequences. Report <strong>to</strong> Congress. Washing<strong>to</strong>n,DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture,2009. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AP/AP036/AP036.pdf.96Gordon, C., Ghai, N., Purciel, M.,Talwalkar, A., and Goodman, A. Eating Wellin Harlem: How Available Is <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>?New York, NY: New York City Departmen<strong>to</strong>f Health and Mental Hygiene, 2007.97Graham, R., Kaufman, L., Novoa, Z., and Karpati,A. Eating In, Eating Out, Eating Well: <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong><strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong> in North and Central Brooklyn.New York, NY: New York City Departmen<strong>to</strong>f Health and Mental Hygiene, 2006.98Papavasiliou, F., Essig, C., Barlett, P., andRolls, A. Is <strong>Healthy</strong> Eating Possible in DeKalbCounty? An Assessment of <strong>Food</strong> Availability,<strong>Access</strong>, and Cost in Two Neighborhoods.Decatur, GA: Atlanta Local <strong>Food</strong> Initiative,DeKalb County Board of Health, 2007.99Gittelsohn, J., Franceschini, M., Rasooly, I., Ries,A., Ho, L., Pavlovich, W., San<strong>to</strong>s, V., Jennings, S.,and Frick, K. “Understanding the <strong>Food</strong> Environmentin a Low-Income Urban Setting: Implications for<strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Interventions.” Journal of Hunger &Environmental Nutrition 2, no.2 (2008): 33-50.100Short, A., Guthman, J., and Raskin, S.“<strong>Food</strong> Deserts, Oases, or Mirages? SmallMarkets and Community <strong>Food</strong> Security in theSan Francisco Bay Area.” Journal of PlanningEducation and Research 26 (2007):352.101City Harvest. <strong>The</strong> Melrose Community <strong>Food</strong>Assessment. New York, NY: City Harvest,2009. Available at http://www.cityharvest.org/images/pdf/Melrose_CFA_2007.pdf.102King, R., Leibtag, E., and Behl, A. “SupermarketCharacteristics and Operating Costs In Low-Income Areas,” Agricultural Economics Reports.Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: United States Department ofAgriculture, Economic Research Service, 2004.103Hrisanti, A., Chong, T., Dang, J., et al.<strong>The</strong> East Baltimore Nutritional Environment:Formative Research with Community Leaders.Baltimore, MD: <strong>Healthy</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res Project, 2003.Available at http://www.healthys<strong>to</strong>res.org/images/downloads/eastbalt.pdf.104Sturm, R. “Disparities in the <strong>Food</strong>Environment Surrounding U.S. Middleand High Schools.” American Journal ofPublic Health 122 (2008): 681–690.105Hunger Task Force of Milwaukee. Hunger inMilwaukee, Some <strong>Food</strong> for Thought. Milwaukee,WI: Hunger Task Force of Milwaukee, 2002.Available at http://www.hungertaskforce.org/userimages/publications_foodforthought_report.pdf.106City Harvest. Mount Hope Community <strong>Food</strong>Assessment Report. New York, NY: City Harvest,2009. Available at http://www.cityharvest.org/images/pdf/Mount_Hope_CFA.pdf.107Zenk, S., and Powell, L. “U.S. Secondary Schoolsand <strong>Food</strong> Outlets.” Health & Place 14 (2008):336–346.108Blanchard, T., and Lyson, T. “<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> LowCost Groceries in Nonmetropolitan Counties:Large Retailers and the Creation of <strong>Food</strong>Deserts.” Mississippi, MS: Southern RuralDevelopment Center, 2006. Available at http://srdc.msstate.edu/measuring/blanchard.pdf.109Blanchard, T., and Lyson, T. “<strong>Food</strong> Availability& <strong>Food</strong> Deserts in the Nonmetropolitan South.”Mississippi, MS: Southern Rural DevelopmentCenter, 2006. Available at http://srdc.msstate.edu/focusareas/health/fa/fa_12_blanchard.pdf.110Blanchard, T., and Lyson, T. “Retail Concentration,<strong>Food</strong> Deserts, and <strong>Food</strong> DisadvantagedCommunities in Rural America.” Mississippi,MS: Southern Rural Development Center,2009. Available at http://srdc.msstate.edu/focusareas/health/fa/blanchard02_final.pdf.111Hatfield, D., and Gunnell, A. <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Access</strong>in California Today. Portland, OR: Ecotrust,2005. Available at http://www.vividpicture.net/documents/12_<strong>Food</strong>_<strong>Access</strong>_in_CA_Today.pdf.112Liese, A., Weis, K., Plu<strong>to</strong>, D., Smith,E., and Lawson, A. “<strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re Types,Availability, and Cost of <strong>Food</strong>s in a RuralEnvironment.” Journal of the American DieteticAssociation 107 (2007): 1916–1923.113New Mexico <strong>Food</strong> and Agriculture PolicyCouncil. Closing New Mexico’s Rural <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Gap</strong>.Santa Fe, NM: New Mexico <strong>Food</strong> and AgriculturePolicy Council, 2006. Available at http://www.farm<strong>to</strong>tablenm.org/closing_nm_food_gap_4pgs.pdf.37


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>114Sharkey, J., and Horel, S. “Characteristics ofPotential Spatial <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> a Variety of Fruits andVegetables in a Large Rural Area.” School ofRural Public Health, Texas A&M Health ScienceCenter, 2009. Available at http://www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/sharkey.pdf.115Valliana<strong>to</strong>s, M., Shaffer, A., and Gottlieb, R.“Transportation and <strong>Food</strong>: <strong>The</strong> Importance of<strong>Access</strong>.” Los Angeles, CA: Center for <strong>Food</strong> andJustice, Urban and Environmental Policy Institute,2002. Available at http://www.uepi.oxy.edu.116Frontier Nutrition Project. Trinity County <strong>Food</strong>Security Assessment. Weaverville, CA: FrontierNutrition Project, 2001. Available at http://www.foodsecurity.org/cfa/trinity_cty_food_assessment.pdf.117Mor<strong>to</strong>n., L., Oakland, J., Bit<strong>to</strong>, E., Sand, M., andMichaels, B. Iowa Community <strong>Food</strong> AssessmentProject Report, 2001-02. Des Moines, IA: Iowa StateUniversity Family Nutrition Program, 2002. Availableat http://www.soc.iastate.edu/extension/pub/tech/IowaCommunity<strong>Food</strong>AssessmentReport.pdf.118<strong>The</strong> lack of community-based studies on this <strong>to</strong>picis likely due <strong>to</strong> the difficulty of accessing data oneating behaviors for small geographies or individuals.119Rose, D., and Richards, R. “<strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>re <strong>Access</strong>and Household Fruit and Vegetable Use amongParticipants in the US <strong>Food</strong> Stamp Program.” PublicHealth Nutrition 7, no.8 (2004):1081-1088.120Laraia, B., Siega-Riz, A., Kaufman, J. and Jones, S.“Proximity of Supermarkets is Positively Associatedwith Diet Quality Index for Pregnancy.” AmericanJournal of Preventive Medicine 39 (2004): 869–875.121Jago, R., Baranowski, T., Baranowski, J., Cullen,K., and Thompson, D. “Distance <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>resand Adolescent Male Fruit and VegetableConsumption: Mediation Effects.” InternationalJournal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity4 (2007): 4-35. Available at http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/4/1/35.122Caldwell E., Kobayashi, M., DuBow, W., andWytinck, S. “Perceived <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> Fruits andVegetables Associated with IncreasedConsumption.” Public Health Nutrition,12, no.10 (2008): 1743-50.123Cheadle A., Psaty, B., Curry, S., Wagner, E.,Diehr, P., Koepsell, T., and Kristal, A. “Community-Level Comparisons Between <strong>Grocery</strong> S<strong>to</strong>reEnvironment and Individual Dietary Practices.”Preventive Medicine 20, no.2 (1991): 250-261.124Alberti, P., Hadi, E., Cespedes, A., Grimshaw,V., and Bedell, J. Farmers’ Markets—BringingFresh, Nutritious <strong>Food</strong> <strong>to</strong> the South Bronx.New York, NY: New York City Department ofHealth and Mental Hygiene, 2008. Available athttp://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/doh/downloads/pdf/dpho/dpho-farmersmarket.pdf.125Morland, K., Diex Roux, A., and Wing, S.“Supermarkets, Other <strong>Food</strong> S<strong>to</strong>res, and Obesity: <strong>The</strong>Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.”American Journal of Preventive Medicine 30, no.4(2006): 333-339.126Chen, S., Raymond, F., and Snyder, S. “Obesity inUrban <strong>Food</strong> Markets: Evidence from GeoreferencedMicro Data.” West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University,2009. Available at http://www.npc.umich.edu/news/events/food-access/chen_et_al_revised.pdf.127Liu, G., Wilson, J., Qi, R., and Ying, J. “GreenNeighborhoods, <strong>Food</strong> Retail and ChildhoodOverweight: Differences by Population Density.”American Journal of Health Promotion 21, no.4(2007): 317-325.128Auchincloss, A., Diez-Roux, A., Brown, D.,Erdmann, C., and Ber<strong>to</strong>ni, A. “NeighborhoodResources for Physical Activity and <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>sand <strong>The</strong>ir Association with Insulin Resistance.”Epidemiology, 19 (2008):146–157.129Morland, K., and Evenson, K. “ObesityPrevalence and the Local <strong>Food</strong> Environment.”Health & Place 15, no.2 (2009): 491-495.130Goldstein, I., Loethen, L., Kako, E., andCalifano, C. CDFI Financing of Supermarketsin Underserved Communities: A Case Study.Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> Reinvestment Fund, 2008.Available at http://www.trfund.com/resource/downloads/policypubs/CDFIStudySummary.pdf.131Anchor effects are commonly recognizedby practitioners and assumed in economicimpacts studies, but there are few empiricalstudies of their scale or scope.132Gallagher, M. Examining the Impact of<strong>Food</strong> Deserts on Public Health in Detroit.Chicago, IL: Mari Gallagher Research andConsulting Group, 2007. Available at http://www.marigallagher.com/site_media/dynamic/project_files/1_Detroit<strong>Food</strong>DesertReport_Full.pdf.133Several analyses have described how the lackof market activity in distressed urban communities38


PolicyLink<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>serves as a barrier <strong>to</strong> business development. SeePeri Sabety, Using Information <strong>to</strong> Drive Change,Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: <strong>The</strong> Brookings Institution, 2004.Available at http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2004/07metropolitanpolicy_sabety/framingpaper.pdf. Also, Robert Weissbourd, <strong>The</strong>Market Potential of Inner-City Neighborhoods: Fillingthe Information <strong>Gap</strong> (Attracting Business Investment<strong>to</strong> Neighborhood Markets). Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: <strong>The</strong>Brookings Institution, 2004. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2004/07metropolitanpolicy_sabety/framingpaper.pdf.134Office of Housing and Urban Development.New Markets: <strong>The</strong> Untapped Retail Buying Powerin America’s Inner Cities. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: <strong>The</strong>Office of Housing and Urban Development,1999.135Porter, M. “<strong>The</strong> Competitive Advantage of theInner City,” Harvard Business Review,73, no.3 (1995): 55-71.136Lavin, M. “Supermarket <strong>Access</strong> and ConsumerWell-Being: <strong>The</strong> Case of Pathmark in Harlem.”International Journal of Retail and DistributionManagement 33, no.5 (2005): 388-398.137Pristin, T. “Harlem’s Pathmark Anchors aCommercial Revival on 125th Street,” <strong>The</strong> NewYork Times, November 13, 1999. Available at:http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/13/nyregion/harlem-s-pathmark-anchors-a-commercialrevival-on-125th-street.html?pagewanted=1.138<strong>The</strong> majority of supermarket jobs are part-time(84 percent of jobs analyzed in the study). <strong>The</strong>Reinvestment Fund. <strong>The</strong> Economic Impacts ofSupermarkets on their Surrounding Communities,Philadelphia, PA: <strong>The</strong> Reinvestment Fund, 2008.139<strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. “<strong>The</strong> Pennsylvania Fresh <strong>Food</strong>Financing Initiative Providing <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong> Choices<strong>to</strong> Pennsylvania’s Communities.” Philadelphia,PA: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>. Available at http://www.thefoodtrust.org/pdf/FFFI%20Brief.pdf.140This study did not account for the probabledisplacement effects associated with transferringsales from one s<strong>to</strong>re <strong>to</strong> another. <strong>The</strong> ReinvestmentFund. <strong>The</strong> Economic Impacts of Supermarketson their Surrounding Communities, Philadelphia,PA: <strong>The</strong> Reinvestment Fund, 2008.141Social Compact Inc., Inside Site Selection:Retailers’ Search for Strategic BusinessLocations. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: Social CompactInc., 2008. Available at http://www.icsc.org/srch/government/briefs/200805_insidesite.pdf142Economic Research Service, <strong>Food</strong> CPIand Expenditures: Table 14, http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/CPI<strong>Food</strong>AndExpenditures/Data/Expenditures_tables/table14.htm.143For a more detailed discussion of strategies<strong>to</strong> address the lack of access <strong>to</strong> healthy foodssee: Flournoy, R. and Treuhaft, S. <strong>Healthy</strong> <strong>Food</strong>,<strong>Healthy</strong> Communities: Improving <strong>Access</strong> andOpportunities through <strong>Food</strong> Retailing, Oakland, CA:PolicyLink, 2009. Available at www.policylink.org.144In 2004, child health and nutrition advocatesand Representative Dwight Evans successfullycampaigned for an initial infusion of $10 millionin state funds <strong>to</strong> launch Pennsylvania Fresh <strong>Food</strong>Financing Initiative (FFFI), a public-private partnershipwhich provides low-cost loans and grants <strong>to</strong> supportretail projects in underserved communities. (Anadditional $20 million followed.) An independentCommunity Development Financial Institution(<strong>The</strong> Reinvestment Fund) leveraged these publicfunds with private capital, tax credits, and othermechanisms <strong>to</strong> create a $165 million fund.145Sturm, R., and Datar, A. “Body Mass Index inElementary School Children, Metropolitan Area<strong>Food</strong> Prices and <strong>Food</strong> Outlet Density.” Journalof Public Health 119 (2005):1059–1068.39


Headquarters:1438 Webster StreetSuite 303Oakland, CA 94612t 510 663-2333f 510 663-9684Communications:55 West 39th Street11th FloorNew York, NY 10018t 212 629-9570f 212 629-7328One Penn Center, Suite 9001617 John F. Kennedy Blvd.Philadelphia, PA 19103t 215 575-0444f 215 575-0466www.thefoodtrust.orgwww.policylink.org©2010 by PolicyLinkAll rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!