SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch
SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch
SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Lifeboat 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />
Original<br />
capacity<br />
Final<br />
capacity<br />
70 90 90 90 120 120 120 120 44 44<br />
70 63 63 62 107 107 106 103 40 44<br />
Table 1: Lifeboat passenger-carrying capacity<br />
On 14 March 2012 a Statement of Fitness was issued for each of the lifeboats by RC<br />
Hydraulics-und Industrieservice GmbH, the contractor who carried out the remedial<br />
work. After successful manoeuvring trials had been carried out, the starboard<br />
lifeboats were finally hoisted on board, using their davits, on 15 March. The port side<br />
lifeboats were placed on board using dockyard cranes, the same day.<br />
1.13.2 Bowsing tackle defects identified in Palermo<br />
1.13.3 Trials<br />
None of the officers on board had previously operated the davits, lifeboats and their<br />
associated equipment as a composite unit. In preparation for the lifeboats' final<br />
lowering and hoisting functional test, which was to be witnessed by a GL surveyor,<br />
the bowsing tackles were rigged on the lifeboats. However, some of the ropes<br />
were very difficult to tension and slacken. Those of No 5 tender jammed tightly<br />
under the cap of the securing bitts and could not be released. The SO, chief officer<br />
and second officers were in attendance and notified the master of the issue. On<br />
inspection, it was found that the ropes, which had been left with the vessel by her<br />
previous operators, were too large. Examination of the other bowsing tackle ropes<br />
found that many were also very tight in their respective blocks. The master agreed<br />
with the deck officers that the ropes were to be changed to the correct size. While<br />
it is believed that one of the deck officers mentioned this to the second bosun, no<br />
one in authority checked that the work had been completed and some of the ropes,<br />
including those for No 5 tender, were not changed.<br />
Depending on their individual availability, up to three GL surveyors witnessed the<br />
lifeboat manoeuvring trials. They had also regularly witnessed the operation of all<br />
the davits during post-defect rectification work load trials. On 15 March, surveyors<br />
also formally witnessed the lifeboats being lowered and hoisted when ‘on load’<br />
release hook trials were conducted. It is unclear whether the bowsing tackles were<br />
fully rigged at this time, although their general satisfactory condition was noted.<br />
The lifeboats were not released from the falls because this had been witnessed<br />
previously.<br />
1.14 FLAG STATE INSPECTIONS<br />
The Flag State Inspections (FSI) on 17 March, were carried out in Palermo by<br />
an Italian marine surveyor on behalf of the Maltese administration. Section 15 –<br />
Life-Saving Appliances of the 13 March FSI Report identified that an assessment of<br />
the lifeboats and their equipment was not possible because the lifeboats were still<br />
undergoing repairs.<br />
33