04.12.2012 Views

SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch

SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch

SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lifeboat 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

Original<br />

capacity<br />

Final<br />

capacity<br />

70 90 90 90 120 120 120 120 44 44<br />

70 63 63 62 107 107 106 103 40 44<br />

Table 1: Lifeboat passenger-carrying capacity<br />

On 14 March 2012 a Statement of Fitness was issued for each of the lifeboats by RC<br />

Hydraulics-und Industrieservice GmbH, the contractor who carried out the remedial<br />

work. After successful manoeuvring trials had been carried out, the starboard<br />

lifeboats were finally hoisted on board, using their davits, on 15 March. The port side<br />

lifeboats were placed on board using dockyard cranes, the same day.<br />

1.13.2 Bowsing tackle defects identified in Palermo<br />

1.13.3 Trials<br />

None of the officers on board had previously operated the davits, lifeboats and their<br />

associated equipment as a composite unit. In preparation for the lifeboats' final<br />

lowering and hoisting functional test, which was to be witnessed by a GL surveyor,<br />

the bowsing tackles were rigged on the lifeboats. However, some of the ropes<br />

were very difficult to tension and slacken. Those of No 5 tender jammed tightly<br />

under the cap of the securing bitts and could not be released. The SO, chief officer<br />

and second officers were in attendance and notified the master of the issue. On<br />

inspection, it was found that the ropes, which had been left with the vessel by her<br />

previous operators, were too large. Examination of the other bowsing tackle ropes<br />

found that many were also very tight in their respective blocks. The master agreed<br />

with the deck officers that the ropes were to be changed to the correct size. While<br />

it is believed that one of the deck officers mentioned this to the second bosun, no<br />

one in authority checked that the work had been completed and some of the ropes,<br />

including those for No 5 tender, were not changed.<br />

Depending on their individual availability, up to three GL surveyors witnessed the<br />

lifeboat manoeuvring trials. They had also regularly witnessed the operation of all<br />

the davits during post-defect rectification work load trials. On 15 March, surveyors<br />

also formally witnessed the lifeboats being lowered and hoisted when ‘on load’<br />

release hook trials were conducted. It is unclear whether the bowsing tackles were<br />

fully rigged at this time, although their general satisfactory condition was noted.<br />

The lifeboats were not released from the falls because this had been witnessed<br />

previously.<br />

1.14 FLAG STATE INSPECTIONS<br />

The Flag State Inspections (FSI) on 17 March, were carried out in Palermo by<br />

an Italian marine surveyor on behalf of the Maltese administration. Section 15 –<br />

Life-Saving Appliances of the 13 March FSI Report identified that an assessment of<br />

the lifeboats and their equipment was not possible because the lifeboats were still<br />

undergoing repairs.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!