04.12.2012 Views

SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch

SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch

SECTION 4 - Marine Accident Investigation Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36<br />

1.17 MUSTER/EMERGENCY PLANS<br />

The muster/emergency plan provided lifeboat and liferaft allocations, as well as<br />

details of the crew’s emergency stations and individual duties. It also included<br />

instructions for discharging those duties. An individual’s training requirement for his/<br />

her emergency role was largely based on this information.<br />

Muster plan Versions 1-4 were developmental and the cancelled shakedown cruise<br />

imposed further late changes to the crew profile. Version 5 was the muster plan<br />

developed for sailing from Palermo to Southampton which was approved by GL.<br />

Crew members assigned a number up to 308 on the crew list, were allocated a<br />

muster duty. Crew members allocated number 309 and upwards were considered to<br />

be supernumerary and not given a muster plan duty.<br />

As the final approved lifeboat-carrying capacity was received from the Malta<br />

administration, the muster plan was further revised. Version 6 was sent to the ship<br />

on 22 March for comment, together with an instruction for the STO to train to the<br />

duties specified on the plan. The plan was further updated to Version 7 but this<br />

became invalid when the Malta administration again refined the lifeboat-carrying<br />

capacities. This resulted in Version 8 of the muster plan being sent to the ship,<br />

electronically, on 23 March so that the training requirement could be further refined.<br />

GL approved Version 8 on 26 March, which was the muster plan in use when the<br />

vessel sailed from Southampton on 3 April.<br />

1.18 TRAINING<br />

1.18.1 Organisation<br />

Within the Saga fleet, the ship’s SO was responsible to the master for the<br />

management of all aspects of onboard crew training (See Section 1.15.1). When<br />

conducting training sessions, he was assisted by officers of the deck and<br />

engineering departments. The company also contracted a specialist fire-fighting<br />

training team which was used on all Saga vessels to ensure crews were trained to a<br />

consistent level.<br />

The company’s STO complemented the ship’s SO in his crew training role. He was<br />

accountable to, and was managed by, the <strong>Marine</strong> and Port Manager. While on<br />

board, the STO was directly accountable to the master but was required to liaise<br />

with the ship’s SO. He was also required to provide a progress report, each month<br />

by e-mail, to the <strong>Marine</strong> and Port Manager so that future training could be targeted<br />

to particular areas of concern.<br />

The identification of shore-based training requirements was the responsibility of the<br />

company’s <strong>Marine</strong> Safety Officer. He worked with the shore-based departmental<br />

personnel supervisors, to ensure that new crew had the correct STCW basic training<br />

and certification for their role. Where there was a shortfall he would, where possible,<br />

arrange the appropriate training before the crew joined a vessel.<br />

1.18.2 Operational ships - training requirement<br />

The annual, routine safety drill requirement was produced by the company’s <strong>Marine</strong><br />

Safety Officer and was laid out in Section 6 of the SMS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!