17.07.2015 Views

Independent Peer Review of - Low Level Waste Repository Ltd

Independent Peer Review of - Low Level Waste Repository Ltd

Independent Peer Review of - Low Level Waste Repository Ltd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Peer</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> LLWR Response to S9R2LLWR_2008-8-2Version 1<strong>Independent</strong> <strong>Peer</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong>: LLWR Response toEnvironment Agency Schedule 9 Requirement 21 Introduction1. The <strong>Low</strong>-<strong>Level</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Repository</strong> (LLWR) has been the principal facilityin the UK for the disposal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Low</strong>-<strong>Level</strong> Radioactive <strong>Waste</strong> (LLW) since1959. The site is owned by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority(NDA) and is operated on behalf <strong>of</strong> the NDA by a Site Licence Company(SLC). United Kingdom Nuclear <strong>Waste</strong> Management (UKNWM) <strong>Ltd</strong>.holds a contract from the NDA for the management and operation <strong>of</strong> theLLWR, and shares in the SLC were transferred to UKNWM <strong>Ltd</strong>. on 1stApril 2008.2. Disposals at the LLWR are authorised by the Environment Agency (EA)under the Radioactive Substances Act 1993. The LLWR receives wastesfrom a range <strong>of</strong> consignors including nuclear power stations, fuel cyclefacilities, defence establishments, general industry, isotope manufacturingsites, hospitals, universities and from the clean-up <strong>of</strong> historicallycontaminated sites.3. In 2002, the previous operator <strong>of</strong> the site, British Nuclear Fuels plc(BNFL), provided the EA with environmental (operational and postclosure)safety cases for the facility (BNFL, 2002a; 2002b). These safetycases were reviewed by the EA (Environment Agency 2005a) and,following a period <strong>of</strong> consultation, a new authorisation was granted(Environment Agency, 2006a). The authorisation includes severalschedules, <strong>of</strong> which Schedule 9 is a list <strong>of</strong> improvements and additionalinformation that the operator must supply.4. Schedule 9 includes Requirement 2, which amongst other things (seebelow) requires, by May 2008, a comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> national andinternational developments in best practice for minimising the impactsfrom all waste disposals on the site. Requirement 2 is one <strong>of</strong> several thatmay be seen as important precursors to Requirement 6, which requires anupdate the environmental safety cases by May 2011.5. The SLC has initiated a programme <strong>of</strong> work – the LLWR LifetimeProgramme – to address the requirements <strong>of</strong> Schedule 9, and is subjectingthe work <strong>of</strong> the programme to independent peer review.1.1 <strong>Peer</strong> <strong>Review</strong>6. <strong>Peer</strong> review is a formally documented examination <strong>of</strong> a technicalprogramme or specific aspect <strong>of</strong> work by a suitably qualified expert orgroup <strong>of</strong> experts who have not been directly involved in the programme oraspect <strong>of</strong> work. The EA has indicated that it expects peer review to beused as one means <strong>of</strong> building confidence in the environmental safetyTerraSalus Limited 1 2 September 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!