Independent Peer Review of - Low Level Waste Repository Ltd
Independent Peer Review of - Low Level Waste Repository Ltd
Independent Peer Review of - Low Level Waste Repository Ltd
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Peer</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> LLWR Response to S9R2LLWR_2008-8-2Version 1<strong>Independent</strong> <strong>Peer</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong>: LLWR Response toEnvironment Agency Schedule 9 Requirement 21 Introduction1. The <strong>Low</strong>-<strong>Level</strong> <strong>Waste</strong> <strong>Repository</strong> (LLWR) has been the principal facilityin the UK for the disposal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Low</strong>-<strong>Level</strong> Radioactive <strong>Waste</strong> (LLW) since1959. The site is owned by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority(NDA) and is operated on behalf <strong>of</strong> the NDA by a Site Licence Company(SLC). United Kingdom Nuclear <strong>Waste</strong> Management (UKNWM) <strong>Ltd</strong>.holds a contract from the NDA for the management and operation <strong>of</strong> theLLWR, and shares in the SLC were transferred to UKNWM <strong>Ltd</strong>. on 1stApril 2008.2. Disposals at the LLWR are authorised by the Environment Agency (EA)under the Radioactive Substances Act 1993. The LLWR receives wastesfrom a range <strong>of</strong> consignors including nuclear power stations, fuel cyclefacilities, defence establishments, general industry, isotope manufacturingsites, hospitals, universities and from the clean-up <strong>of</strong> historicallycontaminated sites.3. In 2002, the previous operator <strong>of</strong> the site, British Nuclear Fuels plc(BNFL), provided the EA with environmental (operational and postclosure)safety cases for the facility (BNFL, 2002a; 2002b). These safetycases were reviewed by the EA (Environment Agency 2005a) and,following a period <strong>of</strong> consultation, a new authorisation was granted(Environment Agency, 2006a). The authorisation includes severalschedules, <strong>of</strong> which Schedule 9 is a list <strong>of</strong> improvements and additionalinformation that the operator must supply.4. Schedule 9 includes Requirement 2, which amongst other things (seebelow) requires, by May 2008, a comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> national andinternational developments in best practice for minimising the impactsfrom all waste disposals on the site. Requirement 2 is one <strong>of</strong> several thatmay be seen as important precursors to Requirement 6, which requires anupdate the environmental safety cases by May 2011.5. The SLC has initiated a programme <strong>of</strong> work – the LLWR LifetimeProgramme – to address the requirements <strong>of</strong> Schedule 9, and is subjectingthe work <strong>of</strong> the programme to independent peer review.1.1 <strong>Peer</strong> <strong>Review</strong>6. <strong>Peer</strong> review is a formally documented examination <strong>of</strong> a technicalprogramme or specific aspect <strong>of</strong> work by a suitably qualified expert orgroup <strong>of</strong> experts who have not been directly involved in the programme oraspect <strong>of</strong> work. The EA has indicated that it expects peer review to beused as one means <strong>of</strong> building confidence in the environmental safetyTerraSalus Limited 1 2 September 2008