21.07.2015 Views

Life Partners Holdings, Inc., Brian D. Pardo, R. Scott Peden, and ...

Life Partners Holdings, Inc., Brian D. Pardo, R. Scott Peden, and ...

Life Partners Holdings, Inc., Brian D. Pardo, R. Scott Peden, and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oker life settlement interests were systematically <strong>and</strong> materially underestimated. As ofFebruary 2006, tracking data revealed that, of the policies brokered by <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong> for whichthe accuracy of Cassidy’s LEs is measurable (“measureable policies”), insureds underlying 88%of those policies had outlived their LEs. By February 2009, the tracking data showed thatinsureds under 90% of measurable policies had outlived their LEs.55. In 2007, the Colorado Securities Commission confronted <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong> <strong>and</strong> itsmanagement, including <strong>Pardo</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Peden</strong>, about the unreliability of Cassidy’s LEs. TheColorado Securities Commission filed an action against <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong>, <strong>Pardo</strong>, <strong>Peden</strong>, <strong>and</strong> othersalleging, among other things, that the Company’s failed to disclose material facts to investors inits life settlement transactions, including “the high frequency rate in which the viators outlivedlife expectancies predicted by <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong>.” <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong> settled the suit by agreeing, withrespect to investments in 524 policies, to refund the investors’ money <strong>and</strong> take back their policyinterests. Company paid $10.1 million to do so, along with statutory interest of $2.7 million.F. Defendants Misled Shareholders About the Impact of Short <strong>Life</strong> Expectancy Estimateson <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong>’ Business56. Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the significance of LEs to <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong>’ profit margins, revenue,<strong>and</strong> investor dem<strong>and</strong> for the Company’s products, <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong> misrepresented, as a contingentrisk, the adverse impact of underestimated LEs on the Company’s business. In the Risk Factorssection of each of its Forms 10-K <strong>and</strong> 10-KSB for fiscal years 2006 through 2011, the Companyincluded the following disclosures:SEC v. <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Partners</strong> Holding, <strong>Inc</strong>., et al. Page 18Complaint

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!