frustration would appear. It is also not difficult to imag<strong>in</strong>e that <strong>in</strong> emergencies, this may alsocause panic and stress provok<strong>in</strong>g the feel<strong>in</strong>g of lack of safety.Opewall and Timmermans (1999) conducted research on aspects that <strong>in</strong> their op<strong>in</strong>ion had an<strong>in</strong>fluence on the pleasantness rat<strong>in</strong>g of shopp<strong>in</strong>g centers. They used a conjo<strong>in</strong>t approach <strong>in</strong> orderto solve the limitations of a cross-sectional approach to data analysis. Even though shopp<strong>in</strong>gcenters fall under a particular category of build<strong>in</strong>gs, still the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs convey a message whichcan be later considered for any build<strong>in</strong>g by select<strong>in</strong>g the aspects that are appropriate forbuild<strong>in</strong>g’s function. Their f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were that pleasantness of public space mostly depends on:- the level of ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of streets, hallways and build<strong>in</strong>gs- the proportions of storefronts with attractive w<strong>in</strong>dow displaysThereafter pleasantness depends on the extent to which:- the public space is reserved for pedestrians- the shopp<strong>in</strong>g center is <strong>in</strong>doors- the number of street activities- the amount of greeneryTo a lesser extent, the follow<strong>in</strong>g aspects play a role:- decorations and furnish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the shopp<strong>in</strong>g area (signs and displays, stalls, benches and flags)- number of coffee shops, cafes and restaurants- crowd<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g area- location convenience- compactness (walk<strong>in</strong>g routes, <strong>in</strong>terruptions of store fronts, surveyability)- proportions of shopp<strong>in</strong>g area <strong>in</strong>doorsThere is also another group of aspects, which can have <strong>in</strong>fluence on comfort. These are thephysiological aspects. In case of underground stations, the most relevant aspects are noise (due tothe pass<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong>s/metros) and temperature (experience of draft and air-flux caused by pass<strong>in</strong>gtra<strong>in</strong>s/metros).Weiss (1987) deals with a number of environmental conditions, which among others <strong>in</strong>cludes theeffects of temperature and noise. These aspects could have an <strong>in</strong>fluence on perception of publicsafety as well. The author dealt with the relationship between temperature and aggressivebehavior. Heat, to a certa<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t, facilitates aggression but afterwards the reduction ofdiscomfort takes priority over aggressiveness (Weiss, 1987). Similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were found for coldtemperatures as well. We can also conclude that temperature (heat, coldness, draft) and noise areimportant factors that can have an <strong>in</strong>fluence on the experience of space. Most of the time theseconditions are placed <strong>in</strong> the background at the sub-consciousness level, but as they approach theborderl<strong>in</strong>e, their effects are experienced <strong>in</strong> the consciousness, <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g our behavior andreaction. In most cases, the adaptation to a situation and short term solutions are applied onshorter terms, while, <strong>in</strong> more severe cases, an <strong>in</strong>dividual may decide to avoid that specificenvironment on a longer run. <strong>Aspects</strong> such as temperature and noise are those <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g thephysiological comfort, which <strong>in</strong> return may reflect on a perception of space.We have seen that comfort and public safety are two <strong>in</strong>separable aspects, yet <strong>in</strong> the literature theyare not often mentioned together. This research will show that both of these aspects are crucialfor space perception. Only together, be<strong>in</strong>g experienced as positive can provide confirmatory- 28 -
judgement and experience of space. Although they are <strong>in</strong>separable, analytically they can bedist<strong>in</strong>guished. In other words, the variables can be def<strong>in</strong>ed for both aspects, which makes theirassessment easier to control. First, an operative dist<strong>in</strong>ction can be made <strong>in</strong> a follow<strong>in</strong>g way.Fulfillment of public safety aspects is necessary and therefore those aspects are seen as standardrequirement. Fulfillment of comfort aspects is an additional quality and should be satisfactory <strong>in</strong>so far as possible. Here aga<strong>in</strong> it is important to say that there can never be such a sharp separationand that the overlapp<strong>in</strong>g is eventually <strong>in</strong>evitable. If we summarize the above-mentioned aspects,we can extract eight determ<strong>in</strong>ants of comfort and perception of public safety. Those aspects aresubdivided <strong>in</strong>to two groups (A n and B n ), where group A n represents the determ<strong>in</strong>ants of publicsafety and group B n are the comfort determ<strong>in</strong>ants (Figure 2).escape (A 2 )visibility/light (A 3 )overview (A 1 )surveillance/presence of people (A 4 )DETERMINANTS OFPUBLIC SAFETY (A n )ANDCOMFORT (B n )wayf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (B 1 )daylight (B 4 )attractiveness/ma<strong>in</strong>tenance (B 2 )physiologicalcomfort (B 3 )INTERVENINGVARIABLESFigure 2: Determ<strong>in</strong>ants of public safety and comfortSafety <strong>in</strong> the surround<strong>in</strong>g was also stated to be very important (Laarhoeven, 1997) but such studyis of a totally different scale than the aspects considered on a build<strong>in</strong>g level. It may be the studyfor itself and therefore this aspect is only <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> a questionnaire to assess its importance, butno specific further questions were asked regard<strong>in</strong>g the surround<strong>in</strong>g of the station. For that reason,this aspect was not mentioned <strong>in</strong> the Figure 2.In the follow<strong>in</strong>g text, each of the determ<strong>in</strong>ants of public safety and comfort will be separatelyaddressed show<strong>in</strong>g through each aspect the possible relation with the spatial characteristics. Thespatial characteristics are discussed separately <strong>in</strong> Section 3.2.2.Overview (A 1 )In the literature, overview is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a space that offers no possibility for an eventual offenderto hide himself (Korz, 1998). Nasar and Jones (1997) state that there are two k<strong>in</strong>ds of physicalconcealment cues: objects such as trees, vehicles, walls and patterns of darkness and shadow. Intheir research, they found that ma<strong>in</strong>ly females associated fear of attack with those places wheresomeone could be hid<strong>in</strong>g. They also reported fears <strong>in</strong> relation to dark spots and possibleentrapment (Warr, 1990; Fisher, 1992; Nasar, 1997).The term overview is here def<strong>in</strong>ed as some arrangement of spatial elements that provides a goodsurveyability by an <strong>in</strong>dividual. In other words, a space that has no large objects or sharp shadowswhich would <strong>in</strong>fluence the ability to survey the space. Goffman (1971) by us<strong>in</strong>g a term “lurk- 29 -
- Page 5: ContentsChapter 1 Introduction 11.1
- Page 9 and 10: CHAPTER 1Introduction1.1. Backgroun
- Page 11 and 12: In the Netherlands, most publicly u
- Page 13 and 14: spaces. There are also other aspect
- Page 15 and 16: The information to be processed is
- Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 2From spatial planing to pe
- Page 19 and 20: In short, utilizing underground spa
- Page 21 and 22: Up until now it has been shown that
- Page 23 and 24: the information but also the desire
- Page 25 and 26: Another important conclusion is rel
- Page 27 and 28: develop a generic method to model t
- Page 29 and 30: In order to define the working area
- Page 31 and 32: spatialenvironmenthuman beingmental
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 3Identification of the mode
- Page 35: case of emergency. Interestingly, t
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 4: View over the platform. U
- Page 41 and 42: •= Layout including both spatial
- Page 43 and 44: comfort seems to fulfill a biologic
- Page 45 and 46: Spatial CharacteristicsSpatial char
- Page 47 and 48: material/coloroverviewconstructione
- Page 49 and 50: Another aspect is the transparency
- Page 51 and 52: there are three key issues that are
- Page 53 and 54: •= the questions were closed, whi
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER 4Theoretical background on
- Page 57 and 58: some way or other has "memory". Add
- Page 59 and 60: XoWEIGHTSArtificial NeuronX1X2 Wj2.
- Page 61 and 62: Xthe inputspace(domain)inputsoutput
- Page 63 and 64: the text. This implies that general
- Page 65 and 66: numerical values. A variable is cal
- Page 67 and 68: artificial neural networks versus f
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 11: The inverse quadratic fu
- Page 71 and 72: part of the data as receptive field
- Page 73 and 74: The main feature of expert systems
- Page 75 and 76: • Use logical (deductive) reasoni
- Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER 5Experimental research: Cas
- Page 79 and 80: Figure 2: The old and new situation
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 8, 9: Entrance to platform (
- Page 83 and 84: Beurs/Churchillplein station is sit
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 22, 23: The main entrance to
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 2: Aspects related to comfort
- Page 89 and 90:
5.3.3. ResponseFrom 27 May until 30
- Page 91 and 92:
7060605050404030302020Percentage100
- Page 93 and 94:
5.4.5. Way of orientingIn Figures 4
- Page 95 and 96:
Table 7: Perception of comfort in t
- Page 97 and 98:
CHAPTER 6Experimental research by k
- Page 99 and 100:
of input information i.e., the case
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 3: Training results for rang
- Page 103 and 104:
Experiment 2aThe first 28 parameter
- Page 105 and 106:
formed by this knowledge model. In
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 4: Hierarchical order of sens
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 8: Hierarchical order of sens
- Page 111 and 112:
information structured as a knowled
- Page 113 and 114:
elationship it is understood to be
- Page 115 and 116:
10.80.60.40.201 4 7 10 13 16 19 22
- Page 117 and 118:
wilhelmina11.624.164.3wilhelmina36.
- Page 119 and 120:
wilhelmina6.720.373rijswijkblaak22.
- Page 121 and 122:
This study considered both metro an
- Page 123 and 124:
Some specific conclusions can be ma
- Page 125 and 126:
wilhelminarijswijkblaakbeurs9.62.59
- Page 127 and 128:
CHAPTER 7Conclusions and recommenda
- Page 129 and 130:
Furthermore, this research is also
- Page 131 and 132:
Additional efforts to improve knowl
- Page 133 and 134:
integrated computational intelligen
- Page 135 and 136:
Appendix A: Questionnaire for Blaak
- Page 137 and 138:
DEEL 3:HET VINDEN VAN DE WEGVraag 1
- Page 139 and 140:
DEEL 8:VERLICHTINGVraag 26: In hoev
- Page 141 and 142:
Appendix B : Learning based data an
- Page 143 and 144:
For further explanation regarding s
- Page 145 and 146:
ReferencesAlsop Architects (2001).
- Page 147 and 148:
COB (2000). Jaarverslag 1999. Centr
- Page 149 and 150:
Leonard J.A., Kramer M.A., and Unga
- Page 151 and 152:
Van Wegen, H. B. R. and Van der Voo
- Page 153 and 154:
SummaryThe intensification, combina
- Page 155 and 156:
aspects, which is derivation of dep
- Page 157 and 158:
SamenvattingBelevingsaspecten van O
- Page 159 and 160:
krachtige combinatie te zijn voor h
- Page 161 and 162:
AcknowledgmentsAfter formal discuss
- Page 163 and 164:
About the authorSanja Durmisevic wa
- Page 165 and 166:
BibliographyJournal publicationsDur
- Page 167:
Ciftcioglu Ö., Durmisevic S. and S