ELEFTHERIOS KOSTANScollectionNONVIOLENT RESPONSETO TERRORISMCommunication, negotiation, and compassion were key themes in apanel discussion titled “Nonviolent Response to Terrorism” onSept. 11. On the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on theWorld Trade Center and the Pentagon, the event attracted so manystudents, faculty members, and local residents to Kohlberg Hall’sScheuer Room that many sat on the floor, propped themselvesagainst walls, or squeezed into the doorways.The event featured Tom Hastings, director of peace and nonviolentstudies at the University of Portland; George Lakey (above),Eugene M. Lang Visiting Professor for Issues of Social Change andCOLLEGE MARKSfounder and executive director of Training for Change; and LynneSteuerle Schofield ’99, whose mother, Norma Lang Steuerle, was apassenger on the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. She and herfamily have since founded the organization Our Voices Together,aiming to build a safer, more compassionate world.Hastings reminded the audience that the event also marked thecentennial of Mohandas Gandhi’s first nonviolent opposition toBritish colonial rule. He emphasized the U.S. position in the worldas one of tremendous power that should be used carefully. “Withmore than 800 military bases in more than 140 countries, we haveenormous responsibility,” he said. Asserting that the war in Iraq isresulting in only pain and suffering for Iraqi citizens, he stressedthe need for communication and negotiation and criticized theBush administration for refusing to negotiate with terrorists. “Weshould always negotiate with terrorists,” he said, suggesting the useof the term “negotiating opponents” rather than “terrorists.“Most terrorism is used by leaders against their own people. Wehave to include leaders when we talk about terrorism,” he said,explaining that radical behavior will diminish if the reasons for itare removed. Also included in Hastings’ approach to nonviolentconflict resolution were the use of “smart sanctions,” massive relieffor poor nations to bring about changes in societal norms and values,cultural and economic exchanges, and peace and nonviolenceeducation everywhere.”Lakey challenged the perception that “we are people doing ourrighteous thing, and then we get attacked for no reason.” If, as U.S.popular opinion suggests, Osama Bin Laden hates freedom, whydoes he then not attack countries like Sweden or Canada, he asked.Some of the behaviors of the United States—displaying “thearrogance of power” by acting unilaterally—are highly dangerous.The country could be safer without sacrificing its values, Lakey said,stressing the need to forge links with other powers—even thoseintent on harming us. Actions such as signing the 1997 KyotoAgreement on Climate Change and joining the International Crimi-NEGOTIATIONANDCOLLABORATIONNOTISOLATION“Pragmatism works so muchbetter than righteousness,”says George Lakey, Eugene M.Lang Visiting Professor forIssues of Social Change.Following are six ideas thathe says “are consistent withdeeply held values in the UnitedStates—including pragmatism!”Ironically, they mayappear, currently, to be out-ofthe-boxthinking—a consequenceof America’s politicalisolation. “Only when we breakout of our bubble of illusions,”Lakey says, “will we stop invitingattacks representing, sadly,a rising ground-swell of worldopinion.”1 Don’t do occupations. Theevidence is clear. Military controlof one nation by another isthe primary stimulus of terroristcampaigns.2. Increase collaboration ofpolice forces to catch terrorists.Military-style responses to terrorismare like brain surgerywith a hatchet. Police work is amore precise instrument,although it requires morecollaboration, which leads tosteps 3 and 4.3. Strengthen the infrastructureof the global community asrapidly as possible to supportdiplomatic efforts on all levels.Adopt the Kyoto Treaty, InternationalCriminal Court, LandmineTreaty, Conventions onthe Rights of the Child. Strengthenthe United Nations. Usethe resulting infrastructure toaddress the danger posed byfailed states.8 : swarthmore college bulletin
9/11 ANNIVERSARYnal Court would also protect us, he said. He used the analogy thattoday’s world is like life in a small town; the more people we know,the safer we are, and the more likely we will be to expose the wrongdoers.We have to give up arrogance and replace it with other formsof self-esteem and return the United States to what we want it to be.Instead of focusing on blame, we should assess how we can changeourselves, he said.Steuerle recounted the stories of some of the survivors of thosekilled on Sept. 11. She referred to them as “ordinary people takingextraordinary actions.” Responding with compassion instead ofanger, many have reached out to women and children inAfghanistan who have also lost loved ones in the war there.On Sept. 14, Steuerle hosted a discussion “But What Can I do?Nonviolent Responses to Terrorism,” telling the audience that thequestion is as relevant today as it was 5 years ago.The goal of Our Voices Together—a nonprofit, nonpartisanorganization founded by the Steuerle family, who launched it withhalf of the $2 million they received from the Victim CompensationFund—is “to empower each of us through our collective strength tohelp build a more secure, more compassionate world.”Schofield explained that members—those who have lost lovedones to terrorism—“do not believe that fighting terrorism shouldonly be in the government and military’s hands. We are creating anetwork of individuals and groups that does good in the UnitedStates and throughout the world.”She was particularly interested in communicating to students themany ways they can engage in service to the world community—volunteerabroad, be or host an exchange student, write an article forthe local newspaper about addressing terrorism through globalengagement, or engage in an interfaith service project.For more information on Our Voices Together visit the Web sitewww.ourvoicestogether.org.—Susan Cousins Breenand Carol Brévart-Demm4. Develop collaborativeinternational programs withpopulations especially vulnerableto terrorist propaganda—around economics, education,health, and other failing systems.Deflate the image ofthe United States as a unilateralistbully through actual collaborativeprograms that meetpeople’s needs.5. Connect with the leadersand institutions providing the“sea” in which the terrorist“fish” swim. Meet their legitimateinterests in ways thatmotivate them to reduce theirsupport for or acquiescence toviolence. Create positiveincentives to encourage theterrorists to use nonviolentalternatives in their struggles.6. Negotiate. Take a complexview of the grievances—including what is not said—and bargain as equals. Eachhas something the otherneeds.A NEED FOR MORETHOUGHTFUL DIPLOMACYThe current U.S. administrationhas allowed “the wholenotion of international law tobe weakened to such an extentthat it has much less clout inpersuading countries to do theright thing,” said 20-year foreign-serviceveteran John BradyKiesling ’79, speaking to a largeaudience in the Lang PerformingArts Center in September.He was on campus to talkabout his recently publishedbook Diplomacy Lessons: Realismfor an Unloved Superpower(Potomac Books, 2006).Kiesling, who resigned publiclyin 2003 as political counselorfor the U.S. embassy inBrady Kiesling resigned fromthe State Department in 2003to protest the Iraq policy.Athens to protest the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq,stressed the urgent need for diplomatic solutions to crises on aplanet that is becoming increasingly crowded.“People should know more about their world,” he said. “One ofthe goals of this book is to allow the ordinary, thoughtful reader tojudge when the rhetoric of his or her politicians is completelynonsensical.”As representatives of their countries overseas, Kiesling said,diplomats are expected to become well acquainted with foreignpopulations, their cultures, and their values, so that they are able tofacilitate U.S. negotiations with the foreign powers.“Diplomacy means giving the foreign power something it wants,so that it will give you what you want,” he said, adding that diplomacyis also cheaper than military force. He stressed the benefits ofinternational law and the United Nations as “excuses for politiciansto do the right thing.”Kiesling explained that one of the main tasks of a diplomat is“to warn the United States when something bad is going to happento its foreign policy.” During the build-up to the Iraq War, which hedescribes as the “biggest mistake since Vietnam,” he was in Athens.After a United Nations resolution failed to avert the war, he decidedto warn the public about an impending catastrophe that he thoughtwas still avoidable at the time. “I am resigning because I have triedand failed to reconcile my conscience with my ability to representthe current U.S. Administration,” he wrote in the letter of resignationthat appeared in The New York Times.As its reputation in the world diminishes, the United States is“losing in the world economic competition,” Kiesling said. Terrorismis not the greatest threat to the power of the United States, hesaid. “We are not in any particular danger. We’re far away, with twoweak and friendly neighbors,” he said, adding that the balance ofglobal power will be altered less by terrorist attacks than by climatechange and population pressure on a planet with limited resources.—Carol Brévart-DemmBILL BELANGER ’66december 2006 : 9