04.09.2015 Views

Wealden Times | WT163 | September 2015 | Education supplement inside

Wealden Times - The lifestyle magazine for the Weald

Wealden Times - The lifestyle magazine for the Weald

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WT <strong>Education</strong> Supplement Sponsored by<br />

freeimages.com/JustineFurmanczyk<br />

History in the Making<br />

After quizzing his teenage sons on the relevance of the Magna Carta only to discover they<br />

knew very little about it, John Graham-Hart analyses history’s place in the classroom...<br />

My teenage sons are not exactly the bluntest<br />

pencils in the box but when I tried a little<br />

experiment and asked them what they knew<br />

about the Magna Carta, one of them hazarded that it was<br />

“something to do with that king who died of peaches” while<br />

the other, with commendable brevity, replied “Wot?”<br />

Questions of their friends about Julius Caesar, Richard<br />

the Lionheart, Thomas Becket, Henry V, Elizabeth<br />

I and Oliver Cromwell produced equally spectacular<br />

displays of ignorance. Something is clearly amiss<br />

with our teaching of history and the blame lies not<br />

with teachers who do their best with limited time and<br />

resources but squarely with Government who give them<br />

neither consistent guidance nor the tools for the job.<br />

It was a surprise, then, that when Michael Gove began his<br />

crusade to bring greater structure and focus to the teaching<br />

of the subject, he had considerable support. Our children<br />

were growing up with only the scantest knowledge of either<br />

time scales or the history of their own country. However,<br />

the first draft of his new national curriculum was, by any<br />

stretch of the imagination, a bridge too far. A jingoistic pub<br />

quiz of a curriculum, it was described by Simon Schama as<br />

“1066 And All That without the jokes” and although it<br />

would have certainly given British children a greater<br />

understanding of their own country, it would have left<br />

them with virtually no understanding of anything or<br />

anybody further away than the Dover ferry car park.<br />

Apart from its blinkered focus, it was far too<br />

prescriptive, demanding, for instance, that Key Stage<br />

1 five-to-seven-year-olds try to wrap their minds<br />

round the likes of Isaac Newton, Isambard Kingdom<br />

Brunel and Christina Rossetti and having to develop<br />

a meaningful understanding of “nation, civilisation,<br />

monarchy, parliament, democracy, war and peace.”<br />

Key Stage 2 seven-to-11-year-olds would be saddled<br />

with Christopher Wren, Adam Smith, Olaudah<br />

Equiano, William Gladstone, Benjamin Disraeli,<br />

Winston Churchill, Clement Attlee and Margaret<br />

Thatcher. In short, just the sort of topics that, in a young<br />

child, would inspire a life-long love of the subject.<br />

<br />

19 www.wealdentimes.co.uk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!