the economic valuation of the proposed ... - Nature Uganda

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Restricted-range butterflies recorded from Mabira include Belenois victoria Victoria White, Dixeia charina African Small White, Epitola catuna, Lachnocnema bibulus Woolly Legs, Tanuetheira timon, Cacyreus audeoudi Audeoud’s Bush Blue, Amauris hecate Dusky Danaid, Charaxes port hos, Charaxes pythodoris Powder Blue Charaxes, Palla ussheri, Apaturopsis clenchares Painted Empress, Euryphura albimargo, Euryphura chalcis, Pseudathyma plutonica, Pseudacraea clarki, 12 Neptis trigonophora, Sallya natalensis Natal Tree Nymph, Hypolimnas dubius Variable Diadem, Acraea aganice Wanderer, Acraea rogersi Rogers’ Acraea, Acraea semivitrea, Acraea tellus, Celaenorrhinus bettoni, Celaenorrhinus proxima, Gomalia elma African Mallow Skipper, Ceratrichia mabirensis, and Caenides dacena. The list of known butterflies of Mabira forest are given in Table A6. The Economic Valuation of the Proposed Degazettement of Mabira CFR | 2011
3.0. ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE SUGAR SECTOR IN UGANDA 3.1. GLOBAL SUGAR PRODUCTION TRENDS More than 130 countries produce sugar world wide. Of these, 66 percent process their sugar from sugarcane. The rest produce sugar from sugar beet. Sugarcane primarily grows in the tropical and sub-tropical zones of the southern hemisphere, while sugar beet is largely grown in the temperate zones of the northern hemisphere (ED&F Man, 2004). Prior to 1990, about 40 percent of sugar was made from beet but sugarcane production has grown more rapidly over the last two decades because of the lower costs associated with its production. The top seven sugar producing countries in the world include Brazil, India, the European Union, China, Thailand, South Africa and Mauritius. The above seven countries produce up to sixty (60) percent of total global output (USDA, 2006). Projections indicate increased sugar production in 2006/07 due to higher production in Brazil, India, China and Thailand. Production in the EU was expected to decline by 5 million tonnes, from 21.8 million metric tonnes to 16.8 million metric tonnes (USDA, 2007). Over seventy (70) percent of global sugar production is consumed in the country of origin, implying that only thirty (30) percent is traded in the world sugar market (ED&F Man, 2004). As indicated in Table 3, world consumption of sugar was higher than production for 2005 and 2006 (Table 3). Africa, Asia, Greater Europe (outside EU) and North America were the regions with the largest sugar deficit (Table 3). In Africa, the deficit was 2.8 and 2.7 million tonnes in 2005 and 2006 respectively (FAO, 2006). More than 60 percent of the global consumption of sugar takes place in developing countries, with China and India leading the way. In addition, it is the developing countries particularly in Asia, which are expected to be the primary source of future demand growth (Sserunkuma and Kimera, 2006). Table 3: World production and consumption of sugar (million tonnes, raw value) World’s Regions Production 2005 2006 Consumption 2005 2006 World 145.2 149.7 147.2 149.9 Developing countries 101.9 106.9 99.5 102.0 Latin America and the Caribbean 50.5 49.9 26.5 27.1 Africa 5.3 5.6 8.1 8.3 Near East 7.7 7.7 11.1 11.5 Far East 38.1 43.4 53.6 55.1 Oceania 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 Developed countries 43.3 42.8 47.7 47.9 Europe, of which: 27.2 26.8 29.8 29.9 European Union (25) 22.1 21.3 18.1 18.1 Eastern Europe in Europe) 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 North America 7.4 7.1 10.4 10.5 Oceania 5.4 5.4 1.4 1.4 Others 3.3 3.6 6.0 6.1 Source: FAO (2006) The Economic Valuation of the Proposed Degazettement of Mabira CFR | 2011 13
Page 1: THE ECONOMIC VALUATION OF THE PROPO
Page 4 and 5: THE ECONOMIC VALUATION OF THE PROPO
Page 6 and 7: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS SCOUL Su
Page 8 and 9: for in the National Forestry and Tr
Page 10 and 11: 5.0. THE CONSERVATION OPTION 31 5.1
Page 12 and 13: List of Boxes Box 1: Out-growers pr
Page 14 and 15: The pro-conservation groups who are
Page 16 and 17: Figure 1: Map of Mabira CFR showing
Page 18 and 19: The Economic Valuation of the Propo
Page 20 and 21: which include schist’s, phyllites
Page 22 and 23: Wattled Starling(Creatophora cinere
Page 26 and 27: The demand for sugar has also been
Page 28 and 29: Table 7: Projected sugarcane produc
Page 32 and 33: 4.2. THE VALUE OF THE SUGAR SECTOR
Page 34 and 35: 4.3. COST OF PRODUCTION AND THE DET
Page 36 and 37: additional sugarcane they need from
Page 38 and 39: Table 11: Estimate sugar estate lan
Page 40 and 41: ) Opportunity of SCOUL leasing land
Page 42 and 43: then the government goes ahead and
Page 44 and 45: expected from the environment (Lett
Page 46 and 47: Table 15: Example of links between
Page 48 and 49: PVB = PVC = Where: 36 ∑ = t n t =
Page 50 and 51: Table 16: Value of Growing Stock Cl
Page 52 and 53: ased on household livelihoods. Bush
Page 54 and 55: 12,078 per annum by the number of h
Page 56 and 57: part of the area proposed for degaz
Page 60 and 61: to mature. Subsequently, conservati
Page 62 and 63: REFERENCES Adger, N., Brown, K., Ca
Page 64 and 65: Multinational enterprises in the pl
Page 66 and 67: Primates of Africa. The IUCN Red Da
Page 68 and 69: Edinburgh University, Scotland. Sim
Page 70 and 71: ANNEXES ANNEX 1 BIODIVERSITY DATA T
Page 72 and 73: Family Species Family Species Rutac
Page 74 and 75:
Family Species Family Species Morac
Page 76 and 77:
Table A2: Species list of birds rec
Page 78 and 79:
Britton No. Species Common Name 467
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Table A3: Species list of Mammals (
Page 86 and 87:
Table A4: Amphibians of Mabira Fore
Page 88 and 89:
Tirumala petiverana African Blue Ti
Page 90 and 91:
ANNEX 2 INVENTORY DATA Table III Ma
Page 92 and 93:
Fig AI Icut id nonsimu sperurbitiac
Page 96:
About NatureUganda NatureUganda, th
show all

the economic valuation of the proposed ... - Nature Uganda

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?