06.12.2012 Views

the economic valuation of the proposed ... - Nature Uganda

the economic valuation of the proposed ... - Nature Uganda

the economic valuation of the proposed ... - Nature Uganda

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12,078 per annum by <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> households gives<br />

a total value <strong>of</strong> UShs 238,576,734 per annum. However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> impact area is 7186ha out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total size <strong>of</strong> about<br />

30,000ha. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> water provision in<br />

impact area which will be lost is equivalent to UShs<br />

57,258,416 per annum. Holding this value constant over<br />

<strong>the</strong> project period, <strong>the</strong> net present value <strong>of</strong> domestic<br />

water provision translates into a conservative estimate<br />

<strong>of</strong> UShs 477,153,468 (or US $ 280,679) 8 .<br />

E. ECOTOURISM<br />

According to Pearce & Pearce (2001) ecotourism is a<br />

growing activity and contributes a potentially valuable<br />

non-extractive use <strong>of</strong> tropical forests. A review <strong>of</strong> some<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> tourism values shows enormous variations<br />

in unit values <strong>of</strong> ecotourism. For example Maille and<br />

Mandelsohn (1991) estimated <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> tropical<br />

forest ecotourism in Madagascar at $360 – 468/ha<br />

based on a study <strong>of</strong> consumer’s surplus using <strong>the</strong> travel<br />

cost method (TCM). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, o<strong>the</strong>r tropical<br />

forest ecosystem values are as follows: $650/ha benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> no logging over continued logging in a forest in <strong>the</strong><br />

Philippines (Hodgson & Dixon 1988); consumer’s surplus<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> $ 1/ha for a site in Mexico (Adger et al 1995);<br />

$740/ha for forest recreation areas in Malaysia (Garrod<br />

&Willis 1997); and $950 – 2305/ha for two forested<br />

parks in Costa Rica (Shultz et al 1998). Generally, very<br />

8 The estimate is conservative because <strong>the</strong> population in<br />

<strong>the</strong> enclaves and <strong>the</strong> surrounding areas will increase over <strong>the</strong> years.<br />

However, it is possible with increased development, alternative water<br />

sources may be developed.<br />

Table 19: Visitor statistics<br />

Year<br />

42<br />

Foreigners/<br />

Foreign Residents<br />

high popularity sites generate much higher values as<br />

demonstrated by <strong>the</strong> Schultz et al study.<br />

Ecotourism in Mabira CFR is popular due to its proximity<br />

to large urban centres and above average biodiversity<br />

richness. The lower case value ($360/ha) for Madagascar<br />

from <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> Maille and Mandelsohn (1991)<br />

could be a reasonable average estimate. Multiplying<br />

<strong>the</strong> Madagascar value by <strong>the</strong> 7186 ha <strong>proposed</strong> for<br />

degazettement, one estimate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecotourism value <strong>of</strong><br />

Mabira CFR would be $2,586,960/year; and <strong>the</strong> present<br />

value at $21,558,000.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, according to Muramira (2000),<br />

<strong>Uganda</strong>’s tropical high forests have some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> richest<br />

biodiversity <strong>of</strong> plant and animal life in <strong>the</strong> world. However,<br />

compared to o<strong>the</strong>r national forests, <strong>the</strong> biodiversity<br />

inventory for Mabira CFR revealed that <strong>the</strong> forest has<br />

average biodiversity attributes (Davenport et al 1996).<br />

The ecotourism value <strong>of</strong> Mabira lies in <strong>the</strong> fact that it<br />

is <strong>the</strong> only THF protected area within <strong>the</strong> Lake Victoria<br />

shore crescent. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, Mabira CFR is close to <strong>the</strong><br />

urban centres <strong>of</strong> Kampala (53km) and Jinja (21km). There<br />

is increasing interest in ecotourism in Mabira CFR as<br />

shown in Table 20. Finally, in addition to <strong>the</strong> Ecotourism<br />

Centre operated by <strong>the</strong> NFA, new developments are<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r nearing completion (for example <strong>the</strong> facility <strong>of</strong><br />

Ecolodges) or are in <strong>the</strong> early stages <strong>of</strong> development (for<br />

example <strong>the</strong> plans <strong>of</strong> MAFICO). These developments,<br />

amongst o<strong>the</strong>rs, point to an accelerated growth in<br />

ecotourism in Mabira CFR.<br />

Locals Total<br />

2005/06 1,989 2,854 4,843<br />

1999 1,312 2,880 4,172<br />

1998 1,450 1,125 2,575<br />

1997 1,304 1,094 2,398<br />

1996 1,097 515 1,612<br />

Source : data for 2005/06 fiscal year from <strong>the</strong> NFA<br />

: data for remaining years, Muramira (2000)<br />

The Economic Valuation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Proposed Degazettement <strong>of</strong> Mabira CFR | 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!