07.09.2015 Views

Who really killed ‘Uthman?

Who really killed 'Uthman - Knowledge

Who really killed 'Uthman - Knowledge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page 31 of 43<br />

5. Virtues of Uthman in Sunni books<br />

We shall now seek to raise some questions and list the lid on the high status afforded to<br />

Hadhrath Uthman in the texts of Ahl’ul Sunnah.<br />

5.1 Ansar’s appraisal of Uthman<br />

Ansar.org states:<br />

Uthman bin Affan, the man of two lights, his wives were<br />

Ruqayyah and Umm Kalthum, the two daughters of the Prophet<br />

peace be upon him, and the brother-in-law of Ali bin Abi Talib,<br />

may Allah be pleased at him.<br />

It is indeed amusing that Nasibi’s whether they be Salafi or Deobandi have an aqeedah that<br />

Rasulullah (s) was not created from Nur (Light) – as Nur is not the composition of a human<br />

being and Rasulullah (s) was human like us. At the same time they give Uthman the title “Dhur<br />

Nurayn” possessor of two lights – how can this be when no human can constitute Nur?<br />

We also have some questions for Ansar on this very topic:<br />

1. If Uthman was indeed “the possessor of two lights” by the same token can we also<br />

deem Abu Lahab to be Abu Nurayn? After all his sons (in Sunni traditions) married<br />

Hadhrath Ruqayya and Umm Kalsoom?<br />

2. Do you accept that this honor gives Abu Lahab a superior virtue over the rest of the<br />

Ummah?<br />

3. Can you produce even a single reference with a complete Sahih chain where Rasulullah<br />

(s) had referred to either of these daughters as Nur?<br />

Ansar.org states:<br />

He prepared the army of Al-Essrah, and bought the will of Romah<br />

and made it free for Muslims.<br />

Preparing armies can in no way be deemed to be a mark of superiority, since lands were also<br />

conquered under the leadership of Nasibi Banu Umayya Khailafas such as Waleed!<br />

Whilst Abu Sulaiman seems to think that the conquest of Rome in some way benefited the<br />

Muslims, Rasulullah (s) made it clear that this conquest would lead to bad feelings, hatred and<br />

oppression of the poor. This is clearly established in Sahih Muslim Book 042, Number 7067:<br />

'Abdullah b. 'Amr b. al-As reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him)<br />

said: How would you be,0 people when Persia and Rome would be conquered for<br />

you? 'Abd at-Rahman b Auf said: We would say as Allah has commanded us and we<br />

would express our gratitude to Allah Thereupon Allah's Messenger (may peace be<br />

upon him) said: Nothing else besides it? You would (in fact) vie with one another,<br />

then you would feel jealous, then your relations would be estranged and then you<br />

will bear enmity against one another or something to the same effect. Then you<br />

would go to the poor emigrants and would make some the masters of the others.<br />

Copyright © 2002-2003 Answering-Ansar.org. • All Rights Reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!