Myanmar
1WZPRL1Jj
1WZPRL1Jj
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MYANMAR BUSINESS SURVEY: DATA ANALYSIS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />
4. Electricity and water shortages are concentrated in<br />
some areas<br />
While the supply of electricity is ranked among the<br />
top 10 most severe obstacles and the supply of<br />
water is among the bottom three obstacles, these<br />
rankings mask important differences between regions.<br />
Figure 3.10 shows that 65 per cent of respondents<br />
from Chin State cited the supply of electricity to be<br />
a very severe obstacle compared with 50 per cent<br />
from Sagaing Region, 37 per cent from Rakhine State<br />
and zero per cent from Nay Pyi Taw Union Territory.<br />
The severity of water shortages was cited by 47 per<br />
cent of respondents from Chin State, 12 per cent<br />
from Tanintharyi Region, 10 per cent from Mandalay<br />
Region and zero per cent each from Nay Pyi Taw<br />
Union Territory and Ayeyarwady Region. These results<br />
suggest that the Government needs to not only increase<br />
expenditure on basic infrastructure but to also ensure<br />
that access is equitably distributed across the nation.<br />
5. Some regions have better infrastructure ratings than others<br />
An index was constructed in order to assess the<br />
state of infrastructure services reported in each<br />
region (figure 3.11). This index is a composite score<br />
Figure 3.10. Share of respondents cited access to electricity and water as very severe obstacles<br />
60<br />
40<br />
Per cent<br />
20<br />
0<br />
Chin<br />
Sagaing<br />
Rakhine<br />
Tanintharyi<br />
Mandalay<br />
Kayin<br />
Yangon<br />
Bago<br />
Magway<br />
Shan<br />
Ayeyarwady<br />
Kachin<br />
Mon<br />
Kayah<br />
Nay Pyi Taw<br />
Electricity<br />
Water<br />
Source: ESCAP-OECD-UMFCCI <strong>Myanmar</strong> Business Survey Database.<br />
Note: The higher the percentage, the greater the concentration of firms reporting a very severe obstacle.<br />
Figure 3.11. Infrastructure Quality Index<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Nay Pyi Taw<br />
Ayeyarwady<br />
Kachin<br />
Kayah<br />
Shan<br />
Mon<br />
Bago<br />
Magway<br />
Kayin<br />
Yangon<br />
Sagaing<br />
Tanintharyi<br />
Mandalay<br />
Rakhine<br />
Chin<br />
Source: ESCAP-OECD-UMFCCI <strong>Myanmar</strong> Business Survey Database.<br />
Note: Higher index rating reflects poorer infrastructure ratings.<br />
26